Board Thread:Clean up Concerns/@comment-366087-20160504151655/@comment-366087-20160504184653

IMO the category is fraught with abuses, being tagged to characters which really are not child-abusers, be it not having the chance to (Kaa (Disney)/Kaa (The Jungle Book 2016), Shere Khan, Him), or no information in the article to detail the claim. Not having the *chance* to abuse a child is in fact not actually child abuse. You're not a killer until you kill. You're not truly a mother until you give birth. Etc.

As for not detailing in the article but tagging it with the category, well obviously it's not really that important a facet of the character, now is it?

I've said this before: aside from y'all who hang out here at VW (and TVT) all these Cat-tags are not really that important. Visitors are mostly coming here following links to the characters they want. They *might* check out other pages of a franchise, but very few of them are checking out others by specific categories. They may follow a link to Him, then check out other Category:Powerpuff Girls villains, but how many do you REALLY think will check out Category:Mind-Breakers, Category:Bond Destroyers, or Category:Hegemony?

Think like a visitor, not a member of this community concerned primarily with tagging cats to pages. Think of the last time you bothered checking the cats of Wikipedia pages.