Thread:Jester of chaos/@comment-31330278-20190813233236/@comment-4708882-20190913215459

1. To me the biggest problems with Clayton is his acts are pretty standard for a poacher and he's not aware the animals are sentient. For that reason I think he'd get more no's than yes' but I do think he is basically the foil to Tarzan in the sense while he might come across as more civilized he's rather barbaric while Tarzan is the more civilized and moral one.

2. For me any could work but hard choice between Rick, Alan Grant and Sarah Harding due to me liking aspects of all them. Rick would be more a strict but active leader, Alan's broken aspect kind of work but in a way might make it harder given how the trust would be harder for both people trusting him to Lead and him wanting to help them, them there's Sarah who is sort of the middle ground. I lean towards Sarah slightly with Rick being somewhat like Joel in doing the dirty/violent work when needed for them.

3. Well with David 8 I'm probably going no and similar with Mr. Frederick. David's case you know with the implications of him still caring for one victim but still considered him a close case, with Mr. Frederick however I don't recall him doing much and Napoleon doing a lot of the worse acts. Tublat I'm more of a wild card but the page at least sounds like most his crimes are just trying to kill the hero and take over which considered standard villainy, if he shows more traits that are crueler I'd probably emphasize them and go into detail on both his resources and the norm of the series.