User blog comment:Magma MK-II/Characters that shouldn't be here, Part 3: Return of the Revenge/@comment-366087-20151230223311/@comment-366087-20151231051105

So you're deeming Wrestling as fake and staged, lol, many would take exception to that, lol. Which then makes them actors of characters. Okay, I can see that.

Yet, are these, or any of the, characters "wicked/evil"??? Antagonists. Jerks. But "evil"? For their setting, how "evil/wicked" can they be portrayed as?

Unless you're making an exception for their "media", but doing that might start a slippery slope precedence as well. Then you'll have users wanting exceptions for all sorts of things.

Like Nostalgia Critic and Nostalgia Chick. Admittedly I only watch their series of reviews when about something I'm interested in, and not each and every installment, but I don't recall any of what they did as measuring up to the criteria for inclusion. Seems to me that their installments have a very disjointed continuity, if any. Which means during one review they are cast as heroes and chosen ones, and perhaps in another as corrupted by the badness of the review subject. The most consistent thing might be some level of jerkassery in how they treat the material under review, but seems to me all would Fail 6.1-3