Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-366087-20170520171654/@comment-7931550-20170521135450

Grizzhly wrote: I cannot agree with that. I think an article should contain the biography of a character, even if the character eventually changes affiliation. Of course, if a villain has turned good, his hero section should not be as detailed (or even longer/more detailed) than the "evil-section", but I don't think that we have to radically shorten them down in most cases (and I'm totally opposed to removing them!). It is still part of the character.

If we do, I fear it will turn into another completely unneccessary purge and I don't think articles would benefit from it if the "end" is suddenly missing just because the character turned good.

I think some articles could be slightly shortened down but overall, I don't find it neccessary. If one wants to write a biography of a particular character he/she should do that on wiki that has the character and not here. (for an example Scorpion from Mortal Kombat. I fail to see how he can be a villain but that is just me). This is wiki that focuses a villain's or villains' evil deeds. Any deeds and changes that passes beyond villainousness doesn't really belong in this wiki.