User blog comment:Looperreallyreallysucks/Pure Evil Proposal - Killer (Blood Trail)/@comment-31599322-20190917205044/@comment-31599322-20190917225844

Listen, I'm sorry if I sounded rude with my short response, but I'm going to stick with my statement. The killer doesn't look heinous enough for me, considering the nature of the work, which is highly “over-the-top appalling”, to quote the criterias (yes, the criterias).

Ate a girl alive? Lecter forced a man to taste his own brain, while forcing agent Starling to watch. Storming houses, chaining people? Peter Mountain of August Underground did this, dozens of times (notwithstanding the murders, rapes and tortures he committed).

Even the Archangel Killer, who appears in a similar kind of movies, sounds as heinous as, if not more, than the Blood Trail's killer. But the Archangel Killer appears in a short horror film that isn't a Torture Porn, while Blood Trail is a Torture Porn, in spite of its “plot”.

When I added Vukmir of the now infamous Serbian Film under Pure Evil, he was rejected because he's part of a Torture Porn with a plot but “no morals”. Since Blood Trail is also a Torture Porn with a plot but no morals (though EXTREMELY far from the Serbain Film in temrs of disturbing content), why would the Killer qualifies and not Vukmir?

For an instance of a horror villain that rightly qualifies in my opinion, I would take Lizard of The Hills Have Eyes remake, because he raped women, killed countless people and even attempted to cannibalize a living baby, which sounds f*cked up enough even for the high heinous standards set by the franchise.