Thread:Nadim.abbas.5/@comment-14660436-20170920185413/@comment-25583409-20170920191751

What do you mean? "Tertiary antagonist" exists. And Ken counts as tertiary because he is the second closest henchman to Lotso, the first is Big Baby. And Big Baby is still referred to as "the secondary antagonist" instead "one of the secondary antagonists". I don't think there is any equality in the secondary antagonist role. Big Baby is the closest to Lotso than any other henchman at SunnySide because they used to be owned together by Daisy. On the heroes wiki, Big Baby is referred to as the former secondary antagonist and Ken as the former tertiary antagonist. These categories still exist so don't think you have changed proof because you haven't. Ken is the tertiary antagonist next to Big Baby being the secondary antagonist and there is no way to prove it otherwise