Thread:Jester of chaos/@comment-2175012-20170215204609/@comment-2175012-20170216152411

Oh, I have been ignoring him; part of it started because I removed his points about Wesker from the discussion page. Look, I am agnostic, meaning I am skeptical about what I'm being led to believe. I was baptized into the Christian faith, yes, but now I am questioning the absurdities found in the Bible. With that being said, I try to be tolerable of religion, but I simply get annoyed by Weedle's attempts at using Catholicism to justify his points. Like with Frollo...he claims that him taking Quasimodo in out of fear for his immortal soul was redeeming, or that he doesn't meet the criteria due to that fear of divine punishment. I don't know what movie he was watching, but Frollo emotionally, mentally, and physically abused Quasimodo for his disfigurements. And I'm sorry, he took Quasi in not because he felt remorse, but to save his own skin.

I don't get his fixation on Maleficent. Besides comparing her to different works with different standards, he seems convinced that her title as mistress of all evil is enough to include her even though it means jack squat. Satan is called the Prince of Darkness, but only a few incarnations qualify and not the traditional one due to moral agency. Actions speak louder than words and from what I've seen, Maleficent doesn't do enough to count.