Thread:Jester of chaos/@comment-4807601-20190724132525/@comment-25906608-20190731185812

Jester of chaos wrote: I don't recall if discussed in blogs or the Discussion tab with if discussions it will be transferred to blog then the rejected will be added to him. Ngh93, I'll put in the blunt way possible: I'm done with the way you assume automatically you'll get your way. The smitten look is enough indication for a kids film when not shown faking attraction or pure lust beforehand we can generally take it at face value with this latest message coming across you'll just remove it because you want to when unlocked. Hell the only reason you are talking about it is because it's currently locked. If you can talk to the other who also defended it fine no problem but only in s civil manner not the "I'll get my way anyway" / passive aggressive you had in the past. Otherwise I'm not just brushing this off and letting you start yet another edit war to get your way. Before someone assumes I'm just trying to pick on him here's the thing: most this time I've kept my mouth shut with him having about 9 previous blocks partly because of this behavior, so if their is a next one it will likely be his last. I don't want it to come to that but there comes a point where we permanently cut ties with users who repeatedly do the same things that are problematic yet don't show much if any changes in that department. Honestly I don't mean to sound agressive. I'm just firm on my notions. That trivia fact can be interpreted in several ways and that makes it rahter confusing and not an actual confirmed fact. I'd ask that other user if I knew who he was.

I'm not even trying to start another edit war. In fact, my intention is the exact oopposite of an edit war. I just am trying to settle this maturely and I found the solution and I got some supporters on my side. And I think that's good enough for me.