User blog comment:Ngh93/What REALLY makes a villain a Complete Monster?/@comment-27818776-20150326235216/@comment-27560932-20150328004705

Palpatine = standard villainy? Please, research your lore before you make such... outrageous comparisons. The "Mistress of all Evil" is automatically more evil than trying to burn down a city of thousands if not millions? A title is not a villainous act. Indulging in your villainy is not more heinous that actually committing it. And even with that, one case of attempted child murder is bog-standard villainy, especially considering Frollo replicated the act on an even younger infant and would potentially repeat it times a thousand upon burning down Paris. I'd delve further in, but it's a lost cause arguing with you and I'm in no mood to plunge myself into another debate.

...Weedle, you've lost credit. Robinson's already offered to agree to disagree. Now, please, research  how to use this trope. It's subjective for a reason; my idea of a Complete Monster is different from yours, as you've clearly demonstrated, and this wiki's not going to ax the category just because you think it should be objective.