User blog comment:Misry6/Pure Evil Removal Proposal: Frozen II's Villain/@comment-34055410-20200114062518

Remaining neutral on this one. Yes, the word “genocide” is never mentioned, but the implications are still there. By draining the Northuldrans of their resources, there are only two possibilities: one, he wants to subjugate them and nothing else. Or two, his intention is genocidal. It’s like seeing a known criminal driving a child away in a white van. The word “kidnap” doesn’t need to be mentioned because said criminal’s intentions should already be very obvious. At the same time, there still isn’t any confirmation.

Supposed genocide aside though, he still starts a war and personally commits a murder, which should push the limits for a film like this. Offscreen villainy isn’t a problem either since the results of his actions are shown.

But yeah, the problem is that the attempted genocide is, at most, an implication based on fridge horror, and many could see his other crimes as standard villainy.