Thread:Valkerone/@comment-37364794-20181110150125/@comment-14660436-20181112223218

What do other messages on my wall have to do with anything regarding this topic? You're pointing fingers and making a huge deal out of something that happens all the time on the Wiki: User A reverts User B's edit, User B asks why their edit got reverted, User A provides an explanation. Every other trusted user has had some kind of incident like this on the Wiki (and many other Wikis too, for that matter), so why are you acting like your toes got trod on over someone reverting your edit with given reasons?

Also, I'm not using it as an excuse. Antagonist fussing and being overly specific over "antagonist roles" has been a problem on the Wiki for years, and now a lot of it has been fixed for the most part due to "tertiary" and "quaternary" etc. being removed from pages while other users have learned to stop using them. And each time some of these terms were around, other users would bicker and change tertiary with quaternary or vice versa over and over again all because of overly-specifying on a role a villain plays in a work. No one wants to open that can of worms anymore and there is a rule against it for a reason.