Thread:LucidPigeons/@comment-1145641-20160211020451/@comment-26205772-20160211053644

I've offered you an explanation; another user took issue with your behavior and worded his report as such that it seemed that you were actively defying the rules. The user was one I trusted; he had actively taken measures to not only follow the rules but improve upon them and offered constructive changes to the wiki.

I've gone over the surrounding logs of everything surrounding this a dozen times between messages to double check. If you weren't at fault? I'm well and truly sorry for any unwarranted/intimidating behavior, and it seems the user that reported you in the first place did so out of what I expect is some sort of bias against you, given some of his previous comments and behavior. I'd talk to him (and I very much advise you to do the same at some point) but shortly after he made the report, he dropped off the face of the wiki and I haven't seen him since.

I need to implore of you, though; awareness of the rules should be very apparent coming into a wiki. There's links to the rules on both the main page as well as the community wall. Review them thoroughly; there's a lot of them and you may not agree with all of them (and as I've suggest, if you have a challenge to make to a rule, actively call out what you want changed instead of passively complaining that said rules is "stupid/ridiculous") but they're all in place for a reason, especially with the temperament of this wiki's community and the improvements we're making to the database. Conflict between users isn't acceptable, either; something of the heart of a well-meaning debate is alright but nobody with common sense should be prolonging an edit war. If someone reverts an edit of yours, constantly? Don't revert back; talk to them or an admin instead of clogging the history with unneeded revisions.

That's all I'm going to say on the matter, at least for tonight. Good night.