Thread:Jester of chaos/@comment-31330278-20170530021846/@comment-31330278-20170828170629

1. Saw "the rescuers" by Disney when you were young? It could be a good movie, if only the animators wasn't insisting on insult our intelligence with uber-cartoonish animation and mindset. Saving children from psychopaths who want to abuse them for getting rich could work well in a serious movie. But guess what? They took mice as agents. And not the kind of animals you see in a serious animal story with anthropomorphic creatures. Mice like in Tom and Jerry. The villains was the only good thing in each of the 2 movies. Nuff said )-:.

2. Speaking of "the rescuers" 1: i know Madam Medusa (the red-headed woman-child) from the first rescuers was based on the animator's ex-wife. In your opinion, the said ex was as terrible as Medusa, over-exasurated for the sake of the movie or was even worse than her animated equivalent?

3. Speaking of "the rescuers" 2: Mcleach (the australian poacher) from the second rescuers was actually quite underrated. If he wasn't animated, he could've been scary. So... Why did they insisted on sending mice againts him, while the right thing to do was to customize him serious heroes (example: a girl who was abductes by him when she was a child and now try to save the kid while going for Mcleach troat for her own personal reasons)?