Thread:B1bl1kal/@comment-27775416-20160123153913

1. I remember you agreeing with me before that if two villains are neither complete monsters, redeemed villains, or remorseful villains and one falls under the animal cruelty category but not the child abusers category would be still violent but less violent than one that falls under the chic abusers category or both categories. Also, because of the fact that Jefferey Fecalman from Family Guy is neither a complete monster, redeemed villain, or remorseful villain yet he hurt actual people (Peter Griffin, Glenn Quagmire, Brenda, and Joe Swanson), I believe that he and other similar villains are more violent than animal cruelty villains who aren't child-abusers or complete monsters. Do you agree? 2. I also just wanted to let you know that you are my favorite user on here! :) 