Thread:Bandainamco/@comment-35235206-20170721022037/@comment-31029776-20170721212428

even better! You claim the stub doesn't belong to you, then you shouldn't care whether or not it should be subject to deletion for having inadequate information and being neglected. And if that someone feels that a page is a waste of wiki bandwidth and has been neglected far too long, it's on him or her to ask for removal. And it is removed. There are two sides of every matters in life.

That depends on the length of the page the article had been remained stub (I had seen articles with stub templates that should've been removed). This particular stub scarecely passed one-line template and had been neglected far too long. All it did was wasting this wiki's bandwidth. You should've looked after it whenever you had time BEFORE it was gone, NOT after.