Thread:Grizzhly/@comment-15895329-20170909175034/@comment-15895329-20170909182857

^I see. So, what you're saying is, because I argue with reason and logic and point out in the holes in the other side's "rationale", it "won't end well for me", huh?

Sounds very Orwellian.

Bad reasoning should be challengable, and the notion that doing it results in punishment strikes me as profoundly unjust. This wiki has altered itself before (numerous things that used to be here have since been removed). Why can't the wiki be altered again if someone makes a valid case for it? If the admins or anyone else don't agree with me, then let them make an argument to back up their stance. But this idea of "don't say anything or you'll be punished" is wrong to me. Unless we want to accept that the admins are utterly infallible in all things and cannot or should not change their stances on anything, which doesn't exactly sound persuasive to me.

The rich thing is that I've occasionally heard the "you can't blame him/her for sticking to his/her views". Yet every time I do it, I get responses like the above. Evidently, people CAN be blamed for sticking to their stance.