Thread:Jamestheawesomefool13/@comment-26228779-20150901041655/@comment-26228779-20150901044824

You really don't understand how well written articles work do you? I actually posted a cleanup message at one point and tried to fix the article. A true legitimate article contains absolutely 0 deduction or theorizing (except where explicitly noted as theories) as it is only meant to describe the subject material. Think of it as if it were an article on the mini games. You're not supposed to interpret them. You are only supposed to write the best well written description you can come up with. We want people to not be influenced by another persons theory. After all, 50% of FNAF followers (including myself) never played the games and have to rely purely upon articles to describe the game. If we include theories we create the impression that something other than "him liking foxy" tells us he's phone guy. For instance, someone might misunderstand your sentence and think that the game gives us both of their names and that its explicitly told to us, rather than implicitly implied.

Understand? Articles are meant to describe the games, not interpret or theorize upon them.