Thread:Jester of chaos/@comment-37409447-20190112172927

I apologize if I ever did anything I did that you were okay I just I doing whatever I did out of good intentions and never meant do anything you or anyone else didn't like I was just saying is it was. For example, Emperor Grumm was intially the main antagonist but was more likely a decoy antagonist or disc-one final boss/ the secondary antagonist to his master, omni, the real villain of the show they appeared in. Another example being that Gotsumon was one of the main antagonists but after being revived he redeemed himself and became a supporting protagonist. It may not be okay however you guys want to it is just that if it's placed the wrong way, for some unclear reason to me is that it just doesn't fit for that purpose. If Emperor Grumm was the main antagonist, he would've not have a master instead he would've been the master himself. If Gotsumon was one of the main antagonists and the didn't meet his painful defeat, then the real threat wouldn't in Digimon Data Squad. It depends on how the show's, game's or film's makers have planned in how the main villain was going to be and how he was going to enter, the presence was going to be and most of all, who the character whether it's a supporting character, an unknown villain or even an old villain from the past or any previous media made in that franchise such as Peter Pan, Godzilla, Star Wars or most cases in Disney. 