Thread:KingOfSting87/@comment-4708882-20190420195944/@comment-38088999-20190421130152

Not the best turn out in my opinion. The fact that KingOfSting had to get another user to talk for him because he couldn’t do it without an attitude means he might cause problems like this again in the future. I didn't get another user to talk for me, he did so voluntarily - I simply asked them if my edits were correct (as he's much more familiar with this site) I’m fine with him removing untrue or too speculative information. But it becomes problematic when he starts removing true or generally accepted info for no good reason. Wiki's go by what's factual, not what is generally accepted. Back in FNaF's early days it was "generally accepted" that the purple man's name is vincent - is there any evidence for this?? What I have removed are unnecessary "aliases" and "quotes", an alias is a name someone is frequently called, not a little one off insult. This wiki looks extremely undeveloped and poorly put together, why on earth do you have three quotes? That looks terrible, quote's should be something that defines a character (ie. with great power comes great responsibility), not some random line that sounds cool - and certainly not two words. Not to mention him enforcing his way of doing things on other people and making threats if he doesn’t get his way. If somebody is breaking the rules, i'm obligated to 1. reason with them 2. report them if they continue There aren't any rules directly explaining speculation, however it is mentioned in rule 2 of the content section in a way that suggests it's against the rules, Please read the "chain of command" section