Thread:JoxFox2109/@comment-4708882-20190306105752/@comment-29414935-20190310135914

I understand. It's mostly like that not every kill of a villain is onscreen or all of their murders are offscreen.

I don't know yet how I want to let the audience feel about him. I mean, like I said, every audience is different. Some mourn villains that are Pure Evil and have fully deserved it (mostly with fan favourites like Joker only), some are satisfying to see a tragic and sympathic villain dying because they are hating them or some even hate the heroes, even if Pure Good. The last I can't really understand. I mean they could be written poorly, but still, why hating them if they are such a good person? But I mean like, it's always different in people's eyes, even when you want to make a villain sympathic and/or tragic. The gangsterboss I want to portray as an sadistic and ruthless asshole who loves killing, but still have his moral codes and minor honor even for a gangster. Like I said, he is even disgust by his assassin who loves to torture people gruesomely and even killed children.

The weird thing is, that I have now a plan for the uncle and the other villain in the third part. They capture children and want to sell them, what is disgusting for the wolf lady to see, that her uncle did this and never expect that from him. The uncle don't hate children, but he cares more for money because he is a bounty hunter. So he is clearly worse than his niece, who would never do this to children even if she is a bounty hunter too, but with moral codes where is to stop. The other villain however, is worse than the uncle and hates children, would hurt them too. But are they both worse than the gangsterboss? I would say no, even if they do that to children. But they never killed them. And they don't kill innocent people like the gangsterboss do. The assassin is the worst from all of them. Like I said, killed and tortured innocent people including children and multiple times tried to rape womans.