Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-2175012-20170823181810/@comment-15895329-20170924204239

Still waiting on some arguments. As yet, I haven't gotten any, at least none that have convinced me. The only thing resembling an argument that I've gotten thus far is "fails heinous standard". I don't agree with this, for the following reasons:

1. The actions of the villains I've listed are heinous enough, especially considering that, in some cases, no one else in-setting has done anything worse (Telltale's Riddler is the main one I'm thinking of on this score).

2. The "heinous standard" as is being used here is to me ill-defined. If someone who murders millions and starts a war, doesn't meet the heinous standard, then I am curious as to what, exactly, meets it then. Because to me, once one has reached the level of having murdered millions of people AND started a war, they ought to be heinous enough. So how aren't they then?

And beyond that, I have gotten no real arguments. Just insistence that I'm wrong, accusations of whining like a child (for making arguments), accusations of hostility (for wanting someone to actually give an argument of substance), oh, and threats also. Yup.

Again, still waiting on specific arguments for each of the villains. I don't get those, I won't change my mind. It's really not any more complicated than that.