Thread:Ragnarstark7/@comment-31330278-20191022103051

Hey, mate. How are you?

As a devoted "Scream" fan, a horror film enthusiastic and the creation of the page, I appreciate your contribution. However, many of the categories your added (scapegoat, amoral, villain by proxy and redeemed) does not apply:

1. Scapegoat - he earned it. Jamal did the right thing when he killed this heartless bigfoot. Compare to his actions, many characters (and at least two killers included) had worse fates.

2. Amoral - he knew what he was doing. His tears were completely fake. He just wanted Marcus to feel guilty for hating him. What we have here is a man who killed a child and hid the body inside a trunk. Amoral people are rarely do these things.

3. Redeemed - none of the killers, including Charlie, Jamal and Debbie, weren't redeemed. Luther wasn't redeemed either. Beside the fact he's worse than Jamal, Luther would probably kill other children if it wasn't for Jamal. The rumors about Hook Man turned out to be true. He saw Deion and was ready to strike. Like many times before.

4. Villain by proxy - he chose to. He have no one else to blame. PTSD doesn't justify his actions after the war. Especially not his rudeness toward Marcus and manipulating him into feeling guilty for hating the man who killed his brother and set him and his second brother apart.

I'm telling you this because I don't want to open an editing war. Just letting you know why these categories doesn't apply before removing them. 