Thread:LucidPigeons/@comment-1145641-20160211020451/@comment-26205772-20160211032544

"Generally conflictive" is something that, from as far as what I'm seeing, still very much applies; a significant example that I can recall is you getting into a rather heated edit war on the Koba page that extended for over a good fifty revisions because of your conflicts with another user over the primary image. That particular user noticed issue with your behavior enough to directly (this thread) reporting that you'd "c reated a page about a villain that is in a movie that hasn't been released yet, criticizes the rule (after I believed you'd been made aware of it), which is in place for a reason, to prevent edit wars, and then 'deletes the whole thing' ". Thing is, if the community takes note of your behavior in a way that causes harm to the community, something should be taken to note.

As for that other user (the one who was posting fan-art and insisting that it stay up)? Do keep on mind on that same thread I explicitly gave him a message stating that this was his last warning. That user's run into similar violations numerous times, and if the circumstance was any more actively disruptive he likely would have been blocked then and there - and likely permanently because that behavior isn't strange to him.