Thread:Gojirules54/@comment-1969141-20131104123052/@comment-16503922-20131130161546

Balthus Dire wrote: Sorry to be blunt but you're getting on my nerves. Not only I but ohter users told you with exemples that it did not correspond. What you need to understand is that, in spite of the COUNTLESS abuse and ill-fitting pages on each category, a category is meant for a DEFINING characteristic, not a fleeting feeling.

For the last time: Freddy might indeed show remorse in one episode, but this does not last. If you ask me, I even got the impression that his remorse was faked. What we consider remorseful villains are those whose remorse lasts and who act to follow it. The problem with Freddy is that for most of the saga, he is portrayed as an unrepentant, perverted, and gleefully evil sadist who performs horrible deeds purely for the evulz, while cracking awful jokes and cackling like a maniac. And this is this portrayal that sticks when anyone thinks of Freddy Krueger.

But the final nail to the coffin is that canonnically Freddy VS Jason comes after Freddy's Death. Meaning that whether or not his remorse was real, it did not last. Just like Dracula, who shows remorse at the end of Symphony of the Night, but returns to his old ways in the following games. i'm trying to get you to understand that no matter what you say, freddy still showed signs of remorse , and he reconicled with his daughter in the comics