Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26570972-20161005222744

This is a subject I've talked about before in the past with both B1b1kal and Jester of Chaos, and note that quite a bit of my opinions have changed since then. I know Darth Vader is a redeemed villain, for example, but if this makes any sense, he's only a notch or two down from a Complete Monster because of his very dastardly deeds. I also think that certain non-Complete Monster villains such as Jonathan Irons, Joseph Chkheidze, Pierre Danois, Percy "King" Dimplewade, Norvirus Raccoon, Knuckles (The Nut Job), Marcel (Rio), and [[Nigel (Rio) are all more evil than Armando and Tipa because Armando and Tipa are rather dumb henchman whereas the others are more of masterminds. As far as the first three mentioned, I think they're not quite as evil as Darth Vader, but almost. I also think Armando and Tipa might be on equal playing fields with Lord Farquaad, Prince Charming (Shrek), and Fairy Godmother (Shrek) because they're all villains who aren't really taken seriously for the most part. However, I know there's probably some who would disagree with me about this but I personally believe that Shere Khan isn't as evil as any villains mentioned above. Don't get me wrong, I still believe he is villainous and that there are villains lesser than him, but he pretty much only wanted to kill Mowgli because he thought Mowgli would do that to him, as Mowgli is a human. Although Mowgli had no intentions of hurting Shere Khan, Shere Khan still didn't believe it. The others mentioned above pretty much wanted to kill other characters for egotistical purposes, which is my personal opinion. If your opinion differs from mine, I will still respect it. Your opinion needs to be respected just as much as mine. If you're not busy and have time, I'd like to know what some of you think in the message section. :) 