Thread:Jester of chaos/@comment-29414935-20181201153231/@comment-29414935-20190303135634

I have a different question this time, not exspecially about villains. Remember when I talked with you about when characters are tied up and wrapped with a rope (Like Kim Possible)? I realised that it is not necessary for every story, or "capturing the hero" in general. In must be more than just be like "Capturing the hero but trying to kill him in letting him fall in something", it must be like "Capturing the hero because they need them for a purpose and not killing them". In general I'm not a fan if hero get captured by the villain when they try to kill them anyway. So why capture him in the first place and not just kill him? And it takes out the more serious and dangerous tone, because it (if you're honest) looks kinda dumb and it has no purpose. So it's more fitting in not-serious and comedy works. But you can be creative which different styles of "bondage"/"tie ups"/capturings you make to be used by the villain. But I have drew some pictures (even if it's a cartoon style) that ruined the story because they used that type of bondage (the rope wrap), and it's just not fitting in the story too. Like I drew (Don't know if I already told you) a superhero anthro animals team, where two of them (male and female) get captured by a scientist. They are then tied up like Kim and Wade (the picture I showed you) and the scientist is threatening them to dip them into a acid-bucket, if they don't tell him their secrets. I mean, it's fitting for the superhero genre but it's also very sci-fi like and like that. So it's weird that a villain would still tie up the heroes in a classic way, with a simple rope, and not something like a laserfield or metall wrapped around them. I could change that in that, but the old picture still will exist and there is no way to undo it. And I also don't want to delete it because it was the first picture I drew of them. So what is your opinion?