Thread:FirstDrellSpectre/@comment-30158554-20171125145522/@comment-24200891-20171130184639

In his age I was more sensitive. I fear sometimes that in his positition I would have become a misogynist, meaning an extreme woman hater. I read about serial killers of women, who were abused by mothers or neglected because of more successful sisters or envious because women defeated them in favorite sport or race for career.

I am interested in Lana's snow episode, in Clyde's episode not much. I hope without Savino there will be less sadism and more heart and equal focus for all main characters and their relationships with popular side characters like Becky or Tabby. Season 1 was flawed, because it focused in 90% on Lincoln as central character, when all his sisters were often victims of mob mentality. Serious flaw of the show is repeating outdated cliches like bully girl has crush on her victim, this destroyed Ronnie Anne's introduction. Very unfair is double standard that Lincoln suffers far more than his sisters, who make similar mistakes. Lincoln was refused free time in NSL and his refuse to participate in family activity was not accepted, when nobody threatened or intimidated or disowned Lucy in Spell It Out. This ep is like Lucy's Sound of Silence and she wasn't tortured or manipulated or kept in fear.

I don't like that Lincoln is shown as the least adjusted family member as no girl complained on things he complained in infamous eps like Hand-me-downer (all girls knew what to do with hand-me-downs and didn't steal), Brawl (all knew and accepted the protocol and not him), NSL (only he complaine about lack of free time), SoS (all could live in this constant noise but him). It's not believable or credible that only 1 from 11 is the complainer, when rest is ok. It makes him look wrong only, because he's a boy. This is sexism. More credible was Lola in A tattler's tale, because reason was legitimate, she was excluded for tatte telling, nobody would accept a spy.