Thread:Jamestheawesomefool13/@comment-26228779-20150901041655/@comment-26228779-20150925015136

Uuuh, I think you misunderstand. Original Research is defined as /any/ form of interpretation. All you can do is what happened in a minigame as it literally portrayed. That is /it/. We can't even say the purple man is a murderer, really, as we never ever actually see him murder.

It is true phone guy likes foxy, but he's not the only person in the universe capable of liking foxy. Think about it as if you were actually trying to prove this in real life. One guy once said FNAF 1-3 could actually be interpreted as a detective looking for evidence. Granted, it's an irrelevant idea, but it certainly described how fnaf must be looked at. You have to look for actual evidence. You can't say:

A has quality B

C has quality B

Therefore, A is C.

That's a logical flaw. It actually has a name. Have you taken high school math? There's a portion of logic where that same principle is mentioned. Phone Guy is a foxy lover, but not all Foxy lover's are phone guy.