Board Thread:Clean up Concerns/@comment-25008763-20170426130718/@comment-25008763-20170426151528

Jester of chaos wrote: I personally saw it more around 60's (mid to late preferably) than 50's but that's just my opinion and wasn't sure if others agreed or not so I haven't touched it. 50s is not elderly at all.. late 60s at minimum in the developed world, if 21st century or higher.. the scale obviously drops depending on setting and so on but we can't get into specifics.. just because most medieval people didn't live past 30 doesn't mean we need to put that as the standard.

we judge "elderly" by what our current developed world sees as norm.. any deviances can be explained in articles themselves.