Thread:KingOfSting87/@comment-4708882-20190420195944/@comment-4708882-20190421134331

@ KingOfSting87- Neither section are even saying against taking things at face value like in Afton's case or even minor speculation if backed up in a story. Not all wiki's are run the exact same way as you personally with the issue everyone had is you just coming in with not your own mindset but your rude behavior towards those who disagreed along with not even the greatest speculation. Some wiki's have to have explicitly said out loud in story bs simply visual implications others don't, Are we somewhat different from some wiki's? Yes we are a bit different compared to some, we allow multiple quotes but depends on length if its own section if it starts getting cluttered but just because you don't like it being two words or not of personal taste doesn't mean others don't see it the other way. Aliases yes have been somewhat abused I actually agree there. That said I wouldn't call our site undeveloped as frankly while some poorly done articles exist (One-Line and Plagiarized) we are a far more diverse wiki than a lot with some different rules to fit this site better such as what we consider worthy of the site as an actual villain over what others might consider it along with some other rules including how bare minimum length and a somewhat speedy cleanup. You don't have to like everything and at times users and admins will take up a compromise but just because it's not all the way you'd do it doesn't mean it's "underdeveloped" or a bad site.

@ Darkknight2149 - I do feel you did a good job explaining your view point which I feel we should listen to. I also thank not simply for the detailed counterpoint but more civil attitude and without resulting in threats to try to make a point.