User blog comment:Magma MK-II/Most wanted articles/@comment-1762629-20141121031930

The wiki's got plenty of attractions already, as we're a solid community with thousands of articles. As the simple topic of villains has been explored in every type of media, we get new articles based on antagonistic characters every day, and if we continue that I think we'll do just fine.

What I will concur with, though, is the treatment of the "flawed hero" discussed below. Some characters we have listed may be anti-heroes to an extent, but in terms of villain and even as role as simple as "antagonist" (when has Spongebob ever acted as an antagonistic force on his own accord?) it gets tired. If an anti-hero has explicitly and notably acted as an antagonistic force in a villainous context, or otherwise displays an abnormal amount of villainous qualities, I may be game for keeping it, depending on the character. Characters who are simple flawed heroes, on the other hand, push the line when it comes to what we accept as "villains." Queen Elsa was deleted in the past due to these reasons. She set up Frozen's conflict, but she displays no evil qualities otherwise. She was an antagonist, but antagonist doesn't always mean villain, and putting something like that here is, as I'll reiterate, pushing the line. Revise the policy on anti-heroes. I'm game.

With that said, refer to my original comments for my thoughts on this blog's original topics.