Thread:JoxFox2109/@comment-4708882-20190306105752/@comment-29414935-20190526141658

But wasn't it like (in fiction) if villains just help because for selfish reasons and/or it would be good for themselves and not for others, they wouldn't be On & Off?

But the gangster boss would be On & Off because he does it for the children and not himself.

Also it would be a good way that the audience could sympathize more with him than before. Showing that he cares much about his sister and would save children because he never would do anything to them what is unexpected for a ruthless gangster. That would put him in a better light than the uncle of the wolf lady. In the first part where he is the main antagonist he is presented more ruthless and murderous and indirectly responsible of the death of the sister of the wolf lady (But that I already said many times).