Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-33076309-20170714004502/@comment-366087-20170714165557

Uhm, "Gender" has nothing to do with "reproduction". So being *biologically non-reproductive* is not the *always* the same as being "genderless". It depends upon the settings and narratives of their universes.

These characters should not be considered as "Genderless". They have genders. They are treated as having genders in their narratives. *Cars* especially imply that there are marriages and families, they simply side-step/don't address the mechanics of actual reproduction.

In the movie *Robots*, there is marriages and families and reproduction is addressed as ordering kits so couples can (literally) "make children". So there are genders.

However, Droids in *Star Wars* are not equated as on the same level as humans and most organics, so regardless of pronouns labeled to units, they are genderless since they don't "marry" or group in "families", etc.