Thread:Magma MK-II/@comment-24600224-20140124025652

Hello.

I'm commenting in favor of editing the article for Courtney to Total Drama. In it, I see nothing but biased untrue propaganda against Courtney. For example, the article states that Courtney is an overrated character and another states that Courtney's appearance is too revealing.

Personally, I don't not find that Courtney is a villian at all, much less an evil one, but I acknowledge that such opinions of her are valid. I don't mind those views regarding her, but I would prefer it if her page was focused more so on facts and less so on someone else's slanted views regarding her. I had took it upon myself to completely edit out her page and edit out all these aftermentioned propaganda in favor of solid facts that was backed up by evidence and clear scenarios that were presented within the show, only for several trolls to continue to roll back my effort to keep her page accurate.

I've even politely asked each and everyone of them to please show me where there views are valid, and they've all refused to do so stating instead that I'm the biased one instead. Again, when I ask them to show me where I am, they refuse to show me where my errors lay (although to be fair, one of them showed me an inconsistancy that I hadn't noticed and I had subsequentially retracted said edit).

If I'm being biased, fair enough. I would appreciated it if someone could show me exactly where I was instead of just rerolling my edits and insisting that I am. However, I highly disagree that my edit for her was anywhere near as inacurrate and biased as her article, which is still currently up for view prior to her lock. 