Thread:Jester of chaos/@comment-33992112-20170524202728/@comment-4708882-20170524221056

I fail to see why you are telling me this. None of the articles I've written tell anything other than the character which I tend to write ones not redeemed and don't go further than what really belongs nfs. If you are using it as an excuse to re-add former to what the overall role of a character is in the film it won't work. The role of what they are in a film doesn't change what their antagonist role was for the majority at most they redeem which does not change that they were on being an antagonist. If the antagonist redeemed does not make them "(former) ___ antagonist of ___" it would simply remain whatever role they were with a mention of redemption in the overall article.