Thread:Jester of chaos/@comment-31330278-20180211164358/@comment-31330278-20181120084350

1. Let me make myself clear. Of course killing Parker is legit, even if doing so making the person who killed him technically a vigilante. My question was about how to kill him if one would catch him and have possibility of either just shoot him or sending him to be murdered in jail. Some people doesnt feel the need to make the killer suffer and just want to kill him/her. Or, if the killer can survive prison, just send him away and choose to be glad he/she won't hurt anyone again. If one have the option to either send Parker to be killed by another homocidal psychopath or just shoot Parker in the head, is it legit to not feel the need to torture the killer and just shoot him and be glad he is dead?

2+5A. Does the need for immediate satisfaction make Carnage more dangerous, or the other way around? I know Jafar dissolved himself because of that need. We know Carnage is short-sighted, Cletus himself never declared himself as a visionary man and Riot probably knew Carnage can't lead for too long, but do you think Brock will understand it and find a way to get Carnage shooting his own leg?

3. I know what you mean about "good to see Lust being a male". Seeing Lust as a woman in "Fullmetal Alchemist" made no sense whatsoever. The anime as a whole wasn't my taste, but the specific aspect of representing the sins was something the good people could and should have known batter than doing. Not just with Lust. Pride as a child surrounded by adults can't go right. Envy as an androgynous is just wrong. At least Jakotsu was scary and had a legit plot-wise reason to be that way. Envy cant even claim he's gay. Arguably Gluttony make sense, but being gluttonous is more than just being fat. It's about wanting more and more without ever having enough. Wrath is the only Fullmetal Alchemist sin that truely make sense. If i know anything about Father, i consider the possibility he took one of Wrath's eyes out, similar to how Red Queen in Tim Burton's version could've take Prince Blackheart's eye out in a rage outbrust. But for me, the worst of all is that the sins had no names. Just nicknames. If they were monsters, i could let it slide. But characters should always have names. Otherwise, they are little more than drawings. Every other group of 7 sins had names. The band of seven from Inuyasha had names, characteristics and their chemistry is worthy of an assignment for college. The 7 ghostfaces (excluding Piper, Kieran and the killers in season 3) had names and serve as topic for debates for some. The seven corrupted heroes in "Overlord" had names and were meant to be symbolic. I want the 7 sins in "Sin of Life" to be interesting characters (still working on Greed and Pride). In "Fullmetal Alchemist" they haven't done it right. I'm not talking about Father himself treating them as living sculptures. I'm talking about neglection in meta-level. Does Edward and Alphonse were at least interesting protagonists, or did they were also less than qualified for a good series?

4. Sure Joel is qualified to this wiki? As hardened as he was, i recall he was a hero. Anti-hero, but still. Taking Ellie as a replacement daughter was a good thing. He nurtured her and played a major part in shaping her to a badass survivor. By "destroyed the only chance at vaccine to save her", you mean "he destroyed the only chance at vaccine for saving her" or "destroyed the only chance at vaccine that could save her?". He does similar to what Rick could be without leadership, but pound for pound, he reminds me more of Ethan Thomas from "Condemned" series.

5B. As Facilier is a drug-addict pander, it does make sense for him to pick on those whom he deem weak and let the underworld do the kills for him. He could strangle his own parents, but your interpetation make sense. He knew who he's dealing with and was rightfully terrified of what would happen if he won't pay his debts, but is it ever accured to him that having a job and live as a lawful civilian would spare him the criminals/loa who sit on his tail and aim a gun to his head? Also, do you think he was the best thing in the movie because he was indeed entertaining and serve a well-written expy of Scar (i used to think he's the love child of Jafar and Ursula, until i realized he's pure evil), or because Tiana was one of those heroes who throw their weight on the villain's shoulders by being boring?