Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-2175012-20170823181810

So after that whole Syndrome debacle, I feel that a rule has to be set in order. Basically, when it comes to any villain listed in the PE category, they can be contested. There isn't anything wrong with that to a certain extent. However, if there are some cases where a villain was disqualified from being PE whether it be because they weren't heinous enough to stand out, or were heinous by their setting's standards (the baseline) but disqualified by relative heinousness (basically if what they had done in their work wasn't nasty enough), they will not be listed under PE. Now, once again, anyone is free to debate them on whether they fit the category or not. But the key point here is that new information must be used in your argument. By restating your points, it weakens your case as your points were already debunked. For someone like Syndrome, he had been debated frequently without any new points being raised. As such, there should be no other argument in favor of Syndrome lest there is new information to support his inclusion.

As for whether a candidate gets continually debated without any new information...don't know what type of punishment to administer there. Thoughts? 