Thread:Futuremoviewriter/@comment-3087504-20140605064637

Sorry if I had to undo your edits on Talia and Bane, I wanna show you something I asked on Samuel Husbands and JKWing's wall

Samuel Husbands wrote: I understand what you're saying. The reason I said they were both the two main antagonists is because Bane and Talia were partners and Bane wasn't really a decoy because he was the Supreme Commander of the League of Shadows and he does most of the evil work in the film. Usually Bane is the villain that Batman fights in the third film with hand-to-hand combat and that's his hardest enemy. Talia was the leader of the League of Shadows, but it was only like 18 minutes left of the movie when we found out she was evil. Is it okay if they were the two main villains?

Larry1996 wrote: Sure

Samuel Husbands wrote: Okay thank you. And I do like your point.

JKWinning wrote: You are correct that Bane was Talia's protector and guardian in the Pit. That is an undeniable fact stated directly in the context of the film. However, the film demonstrated to my satisfaction that Bane was on top of the League of Shadows hierarchy based on how his men feared and admired him as their leader. The Scarecrow comparison isn't really accurate in my opinion. Scarecrow's working relationship with Ra's al Ghul was that of a hired third party needed to enact the plan. The closest analogy I can think of is that Talia is queen, who inherited her position after the death of her father, and that Bane is prime minister, who gained power based on his qualifications as a leader. The prime minister isn't subservient to the queen per se, and in some cases has more authority over her when it comes to making critical decisions.

So I agreed to the fact that they are both main antagonists, and that Barsad is the secondary antagonist 