Thread:Panzysoldat/@comment-31330278-20190725214555/@comment-31330278-20200117102939

BOT: Here's Karl Tanner's PE formality post:

https://villains.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:Valkerone/PE_Proposal_-_Karl_Tanner

Tanner is a classic example of a textbook psychopath who was created by someone just as bad.

1. Your call. No rush. No hush either lol.

2. Hope not. What did other people who heard about your idea says?

3. Michael Myers was supernatural, Amanda and Letherface was redeemable, Trapper and Clown are uncertain, and i'll check about Hillbilly. Danny is still unique. First of all, he had lists of people, and killed the weakest victims first. In simple words, he's not above killing children, elders and pregnant women. Secondly, he have less resources than some of the others killers and monsters. Some of the others have goals, even though they were still sadistic. Danny is doing what he do only for sadism at best, and for sick sense of greatness at worst. To put things in perspective: Danny is worse than Jill, and maybe even worse than Freddy Krueger.

4. Grey zone villains are the kind of villains that can be interpreted either way. Many of them have no remotely noble intentions, just blurry. You do have a point about sympathy, because after a certain redline, the tragedy ain't holding water. Not sure who Chapman, Horny and Cordell are.