Thread:Jester of chaos/@comment-27729149-20150602022947/@comment-27729149-20150815105129

You know I see people pointing out in mehs that the villain showed no remorse for killing someone, ok who is remorseful while committing the act? Most villains often don't give a crap what they've done, honestly many remorseless villains have been redeemed. The governor, honestly even if he was remorseful would that make the action any less awful? Or how about Britt warrick, they literally point out that he had no remorse, that's weird because most villains in game of thrones don't give a crap about what they've done! Should we point that out with every villain? Should we point all those times they've been remorseless? Because most villains are remorseless while committing the act, and even if they are remorseful, it doesn't make the action itself any less horrible, so there is really no point in telling us that.