Thread:BeholderofStuff/@comment-28302658-20170201005425/@comment-2175012-20170202034929

There isn't anything wrong with discussing a candidate if there is any additional evidence to support or oppose it. To be frank, I was never really onboard with Syndrome qualifying as I only agreed to it to prevent any edit wars. That, and I hardly remembered him as sticking out as truly heinous in my eyes. As Lamp has said, what Syndrome does is standard practice of other supervillains. That, and the more that I had learned about the Complete Monster category, it made me further skeptical of Syndrome qualifying. I never said anything on the matter until he was re-proposed on the forum (of course, I avoided the forum, because I knew how it would end), but I found myself agreeing with the general basis. He is the most heinous character in the film, but he doesn't meet the absolute heinous standard.