Thread:NerdWithAKeyboard/@comment-26833018-20180127063838/@comment-29644557-20180127070453

Well now, I can totally understand your reasoning now. That puts things much more into perspective.

Yes, I can understand that. There's a part of the history missing, and should be added in. Got it. The article isn't a stub per sey, but it does need updating. In fact, I've been pushing and planning to suggest a new template for articles that are "Out of Date", in that they meet all the length requirements to not be stubs, but need to be updated with the latest information, such as this one on Wookiepedia. Care to give me a hand suggesting it, and perhaps forgiving me?