Thread:Stolen5487/@comment-34055410-20190210132852/@comment-34055410-20190210171718

While Sherlock may have said Culverton cared about his daughter, after all, Sherlock isn't God. It's very possible he was wrong. If Culverton actually showed genuine affection towards his daughter, the "he probably cared about his daughter" arguments would be on to something, but that's not the case here. Like I said, Culverton's relation with his daughter looks...creepy rather than affectionate. And again, the beginning of the episode implies he was thinking of harming her.

As for the offscreen villainy part, when was the last time Miraculous saw the episode? We literally see Culverton attempting to kill Sherlock onscreen, which gives him a defined modus operandi, and in that scene, he shamelessly gloated about the reason he kills people: it makes him feel happy. And then, there's that eerie scene where he actually shows Sherlock and John the bodies of his victims. If that still counts as offscreen villainy, heaven knows what counts as onscreen.

Still, if I included any inaccurate information on accident (after all, I saw the episode half a year ago), you can just correct me if you saw the episode.