Thread:AustinDR/@comment-26884760-20180216151518/@comment-25008763-20180218012957

I just thought on something concerning de Soules, while we have him listed as Pure Evil and if we go by legends he was the most vile creature imaginable but I have a nagging problem deep down.. namely that folklore is, by nature, filled with absolutely disgusting monsters.. so can de Soules really be considered a "Pure Evil" if the heinous standards are sky high at minimum?

I mean look at Robin Redcap (who also loved to rape and mutilate people for fun and taught de Soules all his magic) - the previous Ranulf (who was killed for being insane and cruel).. the Hermitage Castle even had a Laird that some suggest was the inspiration for Bolton from Game of Thrones.

with such insane levels of depravity in that one castle alone (let alone a folklore rife with things like child-eating hags, goblins that'd dip their hats in the blood of mutilated victims and frequent tales of infanticide / genocide / general madness) I'm just saying can anyone, even de Soules, really stand alone as "king of monsters"?