Thread:Magma Dragoon/@comment-366087-20160105014120

For your help.

The newly re-added blog regarding Villainous Jerks will help. Not having it there was… "crippling".

Please understand that that while, yes, I'm "serious about the Rules", someone, everyone should be. Else pages that shouldn't be here end up here, and then after a while the length of time here gives it weight and then there is resistance to removing them. As has happened.

And while discussions are ongoing, yeah, I'll relate my opinions until swayed, or a decision is declared. After all, isn't that what each side of a discussion is doing? After that, regardless of the final result, I'll follow whatever the decision is arrived at.

Among the edits someone wholesale reverted were what I did with some Disambig pages. Fixing links to inter-wiki format. Removing dead/red links. Information extraneous to a DAP as only the most basic descriptors are supposed to be there and linked-to pages where in-depth details should be. Categories; beyond "disambiguation pages" and perhaps "site maintenance-y types", DAPS should be clear of more specific Cats. You probably already know this, but if any others reading this need where it is recommended, Wikia's Help:Disambiguation will link to Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Disambiguation.

Jester has already restored some of these edits and I'd like to resume the work. With the number of DAPs, the work is both daunting and tedious and likely to take a long time. Fortunately many do not require editing.

How would you like me to handle cases where a DAP has only 1 active link? I recommend, as I already did, leaving it unedited with a "recommend this be reassessed" in Summaries because a Deletion Tag is NOT the action needed since renaming pages might be called for. 