Thread:ScaryMovie53/@comment-4708882-20171002235215/@comment-31330278-20171004225747

1. "So bad it's good" is what some funny animal horror flicks are, like "Grizley Park", right? Maybe "Ghost Raider" is the overrated kind of work. Like "Devil Wears Prada" and its genere.

2. That's why i always felt Stu is overrated. And it's a little weird to think Billy knew he was the villain. Before rewatching the part where the 2 knuckelhead bragged about framing Sidney's father, i though Jill was the only ghostface who knew she was evil. I remember Charlie and Mrs Loomis believed they were victims, Roman believed he was the hero (like the bad guy in my current story when he deluded himself he's the hero and the protagonist is the villain) and Mickey and Stu didnt cared about who is what. Until the wicked smile when saying "shoot himself in the head", i thought Billy see himself as victim. Like he's even worse than i remembered.

3. Planning a story when the plot is not the main priority is weird. Characters should be judged by actions, behavior and effecting the plot. I dont get the deal about people who dont use this rule of thumb.

4. The part with the god who have mortal enemies, like the black death victim, does sound better than the original idea. But i didnt get the meaning of "Didnt haven enough interaction or plot planned". Did you meant you got stuck after discovering midway through your writting that the victim and his sister should have major changes?

5. I start to develope a theory where Chris will become his true not-necessary-moron self in the last episode, like with Eddy in "Ed, Edd and Eddy". Chris might be stupid due to desperation, not because being dumb. Peter could've been Eddy's Brother if he wasnt have moments of being nice (less and less of those).