Thread:Jester of chaos/@comment-29414935-20190706142344/@comment-29414935-20190915230529

The "first bigger bad" villain of my fantasy sci-fi story has a very interesting goal, motivation and philosophy. He lost his family because his planet and it's population was completely destroyed with him being the only survivor. So he wanted to stop war and bring peace in the entire universe. But he himself became what he hatred but still thought it was something noble. He commited multiple genocides in the universe so there would be "peace". And after he destroyed every life form in the entire unvierse, he build a new civilisation under his control, what also was bad. He didn't understand that there will always be war and there is no complete peace. And that he self became war warlord maniac.

So he is clearly not an Anti-Villain, right? But he is still Tragic or not? I mean he still cared about his family and the death of his civilisation was the point of him becoming an villain.