Thread:Joe Devaney/@comment-25560428-20150601134528/@comment-25560428-20150603142352

Nope, I suppose no.

Wikis are entirely made for the purpose of information and not conclusions.

Conclusions can be like: I know Yuno was an antagonist, but you can't really blame her now. I mean, was it her fault that her mom went insane and made her insane too? Nope, it was all her dad's fault because had he cared for his family in the first place, this would have never happened.

But no, you can't put that on a wiki. The only thing you can put on a wiki is what actually happened; and what was the reaction to that incident/ accident. It is upto the audience to percieve everything and draw a conclusion. For a wiki, an antagonist is an antagonist; if that is how it is depiscted in a series, whether it was their fault or not.

We can't compare the evil of characters based on their emotions and their purpose because we find it gross. Mentioning of similarities two antagonists have and differences which they arised from is innocent, but to add why the other one should be percieved as more evil? I really don't think that isn't getting in the way of the true purpose of a wiki.