Thread:Jester of chaos/@comment-31330278-20190813233236/@comment-31330278-20200116164239

BOT: Remember our conversation about Karl Tanner and why he's worse than Joffrey? So here's his formality post proposal:

https://villains.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:Valkerone/PE_Proposal_-_Karl_Tanner

Now when I think of it, he's also similar to Facilier. Craster is the reason Tanner is pure evil, and Tanner was a great student. If we assume Craster doesn't see himself in the mirror, does it mean he's proud of himself for creating a dangerous man like Tanner, or just being shocked in a hypocritical way?

1+4. Maybe part of the reason Patti is tame compare to horror movies standards is being one-dimensional, like Wheatley. She might be an example how to not write a villain. With all humbleness, I can say most of my villains are better than her. The creator could expand her personal rivalry with one of the good guys, like with Jacques and his history as an active dog-hater, especially the part where he made Muller hate his guts: Jacques killed his own son in law because the latter turned into a dog. Muller used to be human, and people like Jacques are the reason he doesn't like his former human self. Also, did the creator want Patti to be that way, or did she come out not as good as he hoped for?

2A. Most of what you said in this paragraph is true and painfully accurate. Especially the part about not letting family ties/old friendships cloud our sight for too long. But i'm not sure I understand the sympathize with them part. Did you mean that we should keep in mind that these people's tragedy aint holding water?

2B. When you said that you believe Charlize's husband will be ok, did you mean you choose to believe she care about her husband to a certain extent, or did you mean that he shouldn't be my problem?

3. After the new rule against hyperball (i'm not the kind of guy to hyperball things. People know that, right), I know better than saying Herman was a serial baby killer, because it's only hinted. The part of not necessarily emphasizing the symbolism is because of the new rule, or because the symbolism might be considered comparing Herman to villains from other settings?

5. A fridge brilliance minute: While writing these lines, I just realized that casting Martin Freeman as General Tiger and Imelda Staunton as Maureen will improve the "Evil vs Evil" effect. Imelda is familiar with playing PE characters, and chances are John Hurt could feel at home playing a militaristic tiger. The main casting for Maureen is Meghan Trainor though. If we're being specific about Maureen: Do you believe there will be a significant difference between Imelda's version and Meghan's version, other than the age gap of course?