Thread:Jester of chaos/@comment-26120048-20180602223549/@comment-14660436-20180928201558

Discovered some more potential Grobda alts. I'll list them below with reasons given:


 * Malfice4 - Like Grobda, insists on adding logos to articles about groups. He also tagged a redirect to a deleted page as deletion with the reasoning being "Dead link.", which is near identical to Grobda's alts doing the same thing to dead redirects. These following articles have all been touched before by his previous accounts, followed up by his edits (see their revision history): Frills, Joker's Gang (DC Extended Universe) and Terraformar. I'd also like to point out that this account, and all of the following accounts below have all mysteriously become active a day or two after the previous batch of accounts I listed above were banned. Supported by the fact that Grobda always does this with his sockpuppet accounts and it immediately raises red flags once obvious behavior is shown from them.
 * Bun023 - This account added an image to the Cranassian Dictator's Military article's gallery subpage, which was created by Grobda and followed up with edits from his "Eternal eclipse1" account. The main page has been frequently edited by a few of Grobda's accounts in the past.
 * Rctd149 - Changed the CTan template's overview on the Dead Moon Circus article from "Villain Overview" to "Organization Overview", which is something Grobda's more recent alts have been frequently doing. The same article has also been edited by Grobda and Bandainamco.
 * Post459 - Same thing as above, but with the Mi-go article. He also got the Neo-Helghasts deleted due to wanting it merged with another. Grobda had a particularly notable history of merging pages with others and had actually gotten in trouble for doing so in the past, so was the deletion for the Neo-Helghasts article really warranted?
 * Rougered983 - Got the Riddler's Frogmen article deleted due to them apparently being "nameless lackeys with zero significance" (again, I've seen Grobda use this reasoning for deleting some pages, and these reasonings weren't applied to mook type enemies from video games). Also, his Armdx077 account had also tried to (and succeeded with at least one) delete some certain articles concerning Batman Villains from film, and considering this article was about some characters from Batman Forever, that makes me suspicious. Also, again, is this even a valid excuse for deletion? I thought the "nameless mooks" rule only applied to certain generic video game enemies.