Thread:Looperreallyreallysucks/@comment-4026690-20190920122131/@comment-1705775-20190920183635

... I'll just leave this here..

the face of sanity..

also, Grundley, we don't particularly *need* evidence of legal insanity (which is not a thing in many places) - he does enough to know that he's insane.

he'd be classified as a deeply disturbed criminal, at minimum, doesn't matter if he's "legally sane" - you know that cannibalistic serial killers etc are deemed "legally" sane.. they sure as heck aren't "sane".. all the "legal" part means is that they are capable of going to prison over being set free.