User blog comment:Misry6/Possible Complete Monsters/Pure Evils/@comment-31599322-20180421140757

This is very well made. D-Stroy really seems to stand out from the others villains, but I've got one question: does he really crosses the General Standards?

I mean, I'm aware of the gravity of his actions, but take Ruber, Hadrian, Israphel or Herobrine for examples: despite their evil deeds and the fact that they have a clear Moral Agency, do they have to be Pure Evil?

From what I've read, he stands out on three points:

1) However, D-Stroy, with the help of D-Structs, abuses a Dreadtrux to make it his slave, and he knew that the Trux were building things made out of rocks containing helium ore, which is what the Dreadtrux eats; this was something D-Structs never thought of.

2) This caused a massive amount of damage to the builds in the Crater, and caused the Ty and his gang (the protagonists) to flee into a secret forest.

3) He says that "the Crater is just the beginning", meaning he may have far more heinous plans in his mind than D-Structs.

But, the General Standards states:

''This is the standards that separates the average villain or character from the Pure Evil villain. At this point, going against the heroes and committing crimes such as theft or murder is basic villainy but with this standard the villain must go above simple basic acts to something uniquely vile.''

Personally, I do not think that D-Stroy's actions are heinous enough to make him Purely Evil. D-Stroy would be Purely Evil, for instance, if he committed something much, much worse that would definitely make him completely evil. For instance, successfully enslaving everyone around him while murdering anyone against him - much like Napoleon from Animal Farm.

However, feel free to add him under Pure Evil. D-Stroy's seems to be completely ireedeemable and the General Standards are rather subjective.