User blog comment:Looperreallyreallysucks/Debatable PE proposals/@comment-24097388-20190717225142/@comment-24097388-20190722063453

Actually, after giving it some thought, I think this is a good idea, but this is how I see it:

So basically the user proposes their villain in their blogpost (whether it'd be a proposal or removal). They go ahead and type their usual stuff as to why the villain qualifies (or doesn't qualify).

Then another user decides to challenge the blogpost by presenting a counterargument as to why the villain doesn't qualify (or does qualify).

The user proposing for the villain then tries to counter that argument and then the user proposing against the villain tries the counter that argument a second time.

After that, it's left for users to vote, based on the arguments presented.