Thread:LucidPigeons/@comment-27729149-20150425083602/@comment-15140470-20150823210210

They most likely were talking to you, Kevin. The question didn't seem aimed at me, but if it was I don't know. That was ages ago and the evidence is all but buried at this point. There was a corrupt officer named Mark Ferman who tried to plant evidence to get him convicted. That incident threw a major disruption into the investigation and the evaluation of evidence. That same corrupt officer was training the LAPD in new investigation techniques only a few years back for some unknown reason. If OJ did commit the heinous act, then Ferman inadvertently ensured two corrupt individuals a path to avoid repercussions, OJ and himself. The difference being, OJ was convicted for a later crime, and even if Ferman did commit more criminal acts (which he may well have) his position would still protect him.