Thread:JoxFox2109/@comment-4708882-20190306105752/@comment-29414935-20190308221630

It's tricky, that's why I want to hear your opinion. Sometimes it's very difficult. But I also didn't know if it's necessary and not maybe a waste that I maybe kill him in that part, even it's a good conclusion in the end. Because it seems like he have not an important role in part 3 and isn't in the middle. Maybe it's a waste to kill him off there, or maybe I made a part 4 where he is the main antagonist again, but I don't want to make too much stories and parts and I don't have really ideas for it. Also didn't know if I should kill the villainess in part 2 because he has understandable motives but still have killed the parents of the main protagonists in the process. But the detective lady is against killing and the wolf lady doesn't do it either, just done it before that, when she "loses" it. So I wanted her first to die similar to the gangsterboss. She is laying somewhere and is bleeding out. Than the wolf lady comes in and she apologizes and wants help from her, but she shoots her. Than the other two came in and ask why she had killed her, which she responds "I free her from her suffer". So that would be a little bit funny. But then I thought, it wouldn't be a good contrast, conclusion or lesson. Then I thought maybe, she is in a dangerous situation like a burning house is colabsing and the main protagonist can let her die, but because she is so good hearted, she rescues her and shows that she is better and is over revenge, even if she killed her parents. So what did you mean?