User blog comment:Magma MK-II/Characters that shouldn't be here, Part 5/@comment-26884760-20160127170520/@comment-366087-20160128184242

You seem to not fully understand.

The idea is how to *qualify* if a character is a Villain enough for inclusion on Villains Wiki. So far the precedence for qualification is basically are they Evil and notorious enough. One-line articles are cut. Under temporary influence is not enough. Being simple antagonists is not enough.

So in determining if a character from a franchise with inconsistent-to-nonexistent continuity in that their role may be re-cast appearance-to-appearance, there needs to be a ruling as to what makes them qualify as villainous enough for inclusion. So in other words, if out of 200 appearances a character is cast as a Villain in 3, are they worthy of a page here? IMO, I think not. 100/200 (1/2), sure. 50/200 (1/4), sure. 25/200 (1/8), sure. 10/200 (1/20), maybe not so much…

See what I'm getting at?