Thread:Jester of chaos/@comment-29414935-20191217152856/@comment-29414935-20200104155614

I don't know if people, you or even me sometimes would like that, but the most heinous and vile villains in my brutal stories who are disturbingly and unethical torture and rape people to death, are getting equally punished. Because sometimes, even if it is more realistic, I don't like it when these kind of villains die too quick, because they deserve way worse. But sometimes I have the feeling I take it too seriously and give these villains too unrealistic painful and slow deaths, or trying to do with some. But I just want justice in my stories and want them to feel everything they have done.

Now I don't know if one villain death of mine is still too "good" for him. I talk about the psychotic torturer one, if you remember, the second most heinous and vile one of all my stories combined. He is kidnapping his ex-girlfriends and then rapes and tortures them over hours and after that, eating their corpses. And if they have children and/or animals, he will do exactly the same to them too. His fate is that he gets his intact eye cut (his other was scarred) by the protagonist with his own scalpel and then is completely blinded. Then he wants to punch the protagonist but he stabs him in the genitals, what causes him to fell because of the immense pain. He then stabs him in the throat multiple times and drills a hole in it, he punches on his neck multiple times and finally gouges out his eyes. But compared with his crimes, it isn't really equal. For example, in another story of mine is a villain that gets a punishment equal to his disgusting crimes, and his death is similar to that of Clarence Darby. It's the pedophile, we also talked about, who rapes and tortures just children and targets them. His fate is that he gets all his limbs and genitals cut off with him being fully conscious and at the same time gets slowly drilled in his anus. So yeah, what do you think?