Thread:Jester of chaos/@comment-29414935-20181201153231/@comment-29414935-20190113201125

I have cutted the story line of my anthro story with the "pig doctor", so the character also is cut and never existed. That means there is no more Pure Evil villain in the story (if he clearly would have be one) and also not a Game Changer.

But wait. I created a new story arc for the story and the new and fresh villain could be a Game Changer and Pure Evil. I want to ask your opinion again. He is a modern pirate who steals holy treasures and sells them on the black market, his vilest crime is when he shot somebody death. You can compare him to Lasombra from Hey Arnold. The standard villains of the story are like I said once before bullies who are thieves or trying to kill the protagonist, with the main antagonist, the archenemy of the hero, commiting murder by accident. This villain however does it on purpose, is ruthless and presented much more darker and serious than the other villains before. I would say he is a Game Changer clearly, but not sure on Pure Evil. And remember the "pig doctor" is cut from the story so he can't be compared to him anymore.

And I wanted to ask how it is (I think I asked that before) when just one villain is there in a story, why are there Pure Evil villains if there are no "standards for villains" because there is just one? I mean if they are the only villains than you can't compare if other villains are worse or the same as them, but I mean because they are the only ones in the stories. I hope you understand. I mean I agree with Pure Evil villains being just the only villain in the story, but if you see it with more detail.