Thread:LucidPigeons/@comment-25008763-20150319022307/@comment-27560932-20150319034248

Doing my duty with Gear. He was a bully who well earned his year-long ban.

As for the Valeyard, I'm not entirely sure. I'm not extremely familiar with Doctor Who (I've done my research, but the paper can only give you so much) much less the serial from where Valeyard originates, but I can say this much.

Being "non-canon" is irrelevant to Valeyard's inclusion as a potential Monster. Whether he affects the modern canon or not doesn't matter, because Valeyard is still a Whoniverse character and should be measured by their same standards.

As for the latter two parts, he may end up outshone by some of the more destructive villains, but if he still manages to stand out in his own way (Danes counts with his one crime with how brutally he plays it) he can still count. Due to a matter of resources, since Valeyard doesn't exactly have the means to end all reality, Valeyard likely can't be measured on the same grounds as Davros anyways because of the lower scale of his crimes.

As for being made of evil... If he knows what he's doing is heinous but still continues to do it anyways, regardless of his moral factor, I think he can make a case for having valid moral agency.

So, you're familiar with this stuff than I am, but I think it comes down to a scale of heinousness. What all does Valeyard do?