Thread:Jester of chaos/@comment-29414935-20191217152856/@comment-29414935-20200126152853

If you remember I had the two villains in one story which were some of my worst villains I've created. I said the two would definitely count as Pure Evil. But now I'm wondering if they really would or if the story is just too comedic and not taken seriously. Because it's a black comedy adult series with much gore, disgusting, bloody and sexual jokes and pictures, and it is one of my most extreme stories ever, it even goes into the exploitation area. So I toned some stuff down to make the main characters not that heinous and vile in actions, because even they are mostly unlikeable heinous villains. So I give some examples. You said that the general heinous acts must be portrayed a bit serious even by the other characters because they share the heinous standard. So I have one scene where the main villain of the story forces the main protagonist to kidnap a child with a "free candy" van. He does that and because he is under stress he shoots the child dead by accident. So it's not really portrayed as comedic but as "black funny". Then there is a episode where the main villain has an inflamed p*nis or an episode where he f*cks an pineapple with a drawn face on it. So you see that story is very weird, disturbing and goes often over the edge. So I don't know if the two main villains of the film can count. It's likely that the films going to be canon to the series but the movies have a more serious and not over the top tone. And I think the two villains of the movie overwhelms the heinous acts of the main characters because they go so far beyond it, with a racist that wants to kill every black american and a pedophile and rapist torturer who graphicly tortures innocent people and is shown to have done the same to little children and animals. I mean, even a cartoon series like Adventure Time has two Pure Evil villains and it's often very comedic and not taken seriously.