User blog comment:Magma MK-II/Characters that shouldn't be here, Part 3: Return of the Revenge/@comment-366087-20151231072347/@comment-366087-20160101192309

Jerk. Antagonist. Rules say these are not enough, they must be doing wicked and evil things.

"Causes/creates conflicts" is not enough. That is what any antagonist does, even if they are a Paladin in a particular story/setting. But 6.3 says ''By definition, antagonist is a character who opposes the protagonist/protagonists, while villain is a wicked character who does evil. While they may overlap, they are completely different things. That being said, do not add pages for antagonists who aren't shown as being evil/wicked, especially if they are good characters or on the side of law''.

By every sentence of that Wil fails the criteria. And every story needs conflict, else it will be a boring story. Conflicts is why any character, actively or reactively, does what it does. Even going into the kitchen to make a sandwich is the result of a conflict, that of character vs hunger.

IMO, to date TBBT has no villains. Antagonists, sure, but this is not the Antagonists wiki, as 6.2 says ''this is a VILLAINS Wiki and we need to keep it that way. Being a simple "jerk" will no longer be valid''.

As for "by sitcom standards"…again, every story, even comedies and sitcoms, have an antagonist, but every antagonist is not a villain. Therefore every comedy and sitcom does not have a villain.

There are plenty stories, sitcoms to serious, with villains. More than enough to fill this wikia. We don't need to be forcing every character to be a villain.