Thread:Jester of chaos/@comment-27567640-20160215153644

Hello. I saw the blog about the Knight of Cerebereus, and I do oppose deleteing the category. I do have a suggestion on strict guidelines, however though

1. Simply being a dark villain does not qualify. This is the main confuser, if the villain is dark, it is a KOC. Not true, has to be particularly dark along with removing anything funny, laughable etc. A nice example would be Janja from the Lion Guard, in that while he is a dark villain, he has a few comedic moments, and therefore dosent qualify.

2. It must be something way beyond what you would expect to see in the respective media. If for example, you saw a sociopathic killer in My Little Pony, for example, definitely qualifies, because that is not the kind of villain you would expect to see in a kid's show. Also there is nothing funny, or something you can laugh about a villain like that, there is nothing funny about a KOC, nothing to laugh about what they do.

3. They are more darker according to their universe because they commit acts that are not the average villain scheme in the universe. Another example would be the Lion Guard, most of the villains primarily commit acts that although are certainly evil, aren't really vile. Even some of Janja's schemes usually have him treat the main protagonists more as a nusicance, a Knight of Cerebereus will take the protagonists very seriously and will happily commit crimes simply to draw the protagonists to them. If the Lion Guard had a sociopath who kidnapped and killed children and a lot of them, that would be a definite qualifier.

While deleting Knight of Cerebereus would deal with the abuse, it would probably result in controversy, and there would probably be a need to create a category to take Knight of Cerebereus place. I put this in a comment on your blog, but I am asking you, instead of asking them to decide if its deleted, if my proposed guidelines would make monitoring the category more easier and if it would tone down abuse. 