Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-3542887-20170726025435

Villains such as "amimals needing food to stay alive", they're smarter than your average animal. Animals who ACTUALLY NEED food are just plain stupid, in figuritive terms. I suggest you do research on animal behavior before saying that this makes no difference. It DOES make a difference. Some like JP 3's velociraptor's set a trap that's NOT NORMAL. Needing food to survive is ALWAYS normal, not strageized like humans. I know a lot of animals needing food DO have strategies, but the animals in fiction make them look human AND evil. Sorry for continuing this chat, but I still find these "animal not villain" rules outrageous, which I haven't told you before, or did I say something like that before? I'm not a zoologist, so this animal not villain stuff is becoming even more confusing for me and us, though you still need to look again, cause you might have missed something, even if its ultra super tiny. We all make mistakes, but I think you all need to hear me out. That's all I'm asking for now, so I hope I CAN make a difference about this outrageous stuff about animals not villain. P.S.: Sorry for all these caps locks, I just wanted to make a bigger point than before.  