Thread:MamaLuigi22/@comment-6554265-20140712015019/@comment-25070626-20150921194240

Fireworks888 wrote: As the title states, I'm sorry for being so harsh. It's just, SO many people have recreated the Spongebob article. It's plagued the wiki for well over two years, and has plagued me for well over one year. Spongebob is no more than a flawed hero. This discussion has been debated for years, and it refuses to be laid to rest. This is WHY Spongebob won't be accepted here.

A character must have two things to make them villains.

1: If they meant their crimes or not.

2: How bad their crime(s) were.

Spongebob doesn't do his crimes on purpose, and his crimes aren't bad enough to be considered villainous. Just because you do something villainous doesn't make you a villain. It makes you a flawed person, and since Spongebob literally saved Bikini Bottom several times just for the greater good, he's a flawed hero. By that mentality, wouldn't Patrick Star be a flawed hero for his crimes being on accident. As well as him saving bikini bottom for the greater good? If your going to use reasoning, make your reasoning REASONABLE! Peter Griffin has saved quahog before, and he is still a villain. What about the episode with Pluffy Fluffy, isn't that animal abuse?! Frankly sir, your logic is idiotic