Thread:LucidPigeons/@comment-27818776-20151122125253/@comment-2059440-20151130220417

I am against removing jerks by the way, as I feel it is an example of giving into user abuse of an archetype seen in many media - especially younger media, where a "Villainous Jerk" is often a very valid villain in scenarios where others would not be acceptable (or available).

For example in heavily censored regions or media frequently believed for younger audiences the villain is often restricted to petty, bullying and "jerky" behaviors but will accompany that behavior with criminal tendencies.. they are thus a "Villainous Jerk".

Instead of removing the category we should simply of done what we did with bullies and added a warning stating :

"in order to qualify please remember "Jerks" must exhibit (like all villains on this wiki) some manner of geniune criminal behavior, not simply act in a dislikeable manner as personal belief on "right" and "wrong" has no place on a unbiased wiki.. also do not confuse a Villainous Jerk with a Flawed Hero.. a Villainous Jerk exhibits criminal tendencies alongside their unlikeable traits, a Flawed Hero is simply a protagonist that happens to have dislikeable traits and should be added to the Heroes Wiki"