Thread:Inferno Pendragon/@comment-15895329-20170924203553/@comment-15895329-20170924205016

Also, the claim that he's "not above changing his mind if presented with facts on the matter" is the impression I was operating under when I gave my arguments...and then his only response was: "I can't agree with any of this". That's it.

Look, I'm not trying to be a crazed rebel here, but is it really wrong of me to want something with more substance than the above? How is there any discussion that way? Wouldn't it be more productive to analyze the villains and their actions thoroughly? Rather than just a back and forth of "he doesn't fit!" "he does!" "he doesn't fit!" "he does!"?

To me, this just isn't making sense. Why is that, when I make an argument, said argument is not dissected or challenged at all but merely rebuffed wholesale without discussion, and then I insist to have a proper counterargument...that puts me in the wrong? I am not understanding that. I am also not understanding why not being won over by arguments I find unconvincing puts me in the wrong either.

And, none of this is yelling. None of this is "sticking it to the man". I am just trying to understand why my requesting specific arguments is so distasteful to so many.