Thread:LucidPigeons/@comment-366087-20160214023142/@comment-366087-20160214035045

Thank you.

Now I need some… Approved Procedure to continue along these lines, because I expect some *heavy* pushback going forward.

For example, I just perused the subcats of Category:Pedophiles, and the *answer* to ALL the subcats is NO, with only one Concession. In ALL of these cases, the answer to the "Qualifier Question" is "No". Not ALL rapists are pedophiles, not ALL Outright Villains are pedophiles, etc.
 * Category:Lustful Villains
 * Category:Perverts
 * Category:Villains by Type
 * Category:Villains With Mental Illness
 * Category:Destroyer of Innocence
 * Category:Rapists
 * Category:Outright Villains

Now, the REVERSE is true in most of these cases. Pedophiles ARE subcats of most on this list. Which MEANS that if anything, *Pedophiles* needs to be placed on those Categories, so that the question of if Pedophiles are also defined by…" will be "yes".


 * Although, thought needs be had if notation about country, culture, and or time-periods needs to be made. For example, it is part of some Third World cultures where Older is allowed to "marry"/mate with younger; that the definitions of what are "adults" and not are far different from Western/most modern regions and societies. A girl of 12 could pass adulthood rites, and thus for a man much older to be with her would not be pedophilia…

The one concession I'll make from the above list is Category:Mature, as first, that is auto-added by the template, and second, the result is to ADD the template and therefore notate that this Page/Category is marked with that banner more so than it being made a subcat. If you follow the distinctions.