Thread:LucidPigeons/@comment-2175012-20160509175734/@comment-2175012-20160512235940

Well, not really; he tried to con the original owner into giving him his restaurant, and he attempted to sell it off, the only problem being that the original owner needed to be present in order for the transfer to be legal. He meets this man in prison, though he doesn't show affection towards him, so it's nothing too mitigating. When one of his employees was wanting to go visit her sick mother, he makes it seem that he was going to give her money to support her, but he of course kills her. This was the part that made me question whether I should propose him; he strips her, and he fondles her breasts as he rapes her, and he caps that off by shoving chopsticks into her vagina (which we don't see; all that we see is the blood spilling on the floor. The film actually isn't a torture porn, as it does actually have a plot, and it's not too overly explicit, though I'm somewhat wary on that. Can full frontal nudity disqualify him?

The other issue regards his interrogations; when he first gets arrested, he's brutalized by the police force, as well as the inmates of the prison that he was sent to. However, I can't say that this is a freudian excuse, because given his previous murders, he somewhat deserves a good beating. That, and the original owner had a brother who was imprisoned who immediately assaults Wong, though I feel that this was justified. As for whether or not he felt remorse, Wong stated that he deserved what he got for not being thorough in disposing of the evidence.

He, of course, sets the heinous standard with multiple deaths on his hands, and he's a rapist to boot.