Thread:Queen Misery/@comment-34097347-20150821170849/@comment-2059440-20150821201331

besides the reasons are quite simple, I couldn't care if Magma or others disapproved of the Achievements, that's fine but Magma took it upon him to deactivate it without asking only to leave a message akin to something you'd say to someone you believe did something stupid.. if he simply asked "why did you activate Achievements?" it'd of been fine but his wording made it clear he questioned my ability to do simple things.

Besides personal differences the core question was answered : most wikis I know have the Achievements in them, we don't.. some like that, some don't.. normally activating them does good for a wiki if they are left be.. sometimes they don't do good at all : "pros" and "cons" of everything.. but by saying stuff like "why on earth would you do this?" is to ignore any pros or cons and simply say "what you did was wrong".

It is about wording, something that trips many on the internet.. text is an easy way to communicate but it is complex to tell *what* you are communicating (because we can't pick up on tone or gestures for a start).