Thread:AustinDR/@comment-3581997-20171121002157/@comment-3581997-20171121152642

The Willy v Robotnic situation for example. Two mad scientists, warp the wills of others as minions, both want to ultimately take over the world, neither has any redeemable qualities per-say. Originally you said the deciding factor was Robotnic stole the invention of someone else and warped it, but in Willy's case his victims are also stolen technology. These seem like all the same actions and resources, why is Robotnic, to continue with this situation as an example for others, PE and Willy is just a standard outright villain, what is the deciding factor? I already asked about indulging tone of lesser stories but that wasn't it so I am somewhat lost in the logic-at play for distinction.