Board Thread:Clean up Concerns/@comment-1705775-20170927133742/@comment-1705775-20170929042851

Mesektet wrote: Small clarification for any Satanists in the house: If Biblical/Theology Villains are reinstated here, Heroes wiki will as well, so don't worry about trying to argue Satan shouldn't be a villain, the other side of the moral fence will be open as well again. Same standard though, work will need to be sited and it will be policed for accuracy. I was going to wait until after the votes were tallied but I suppose I need to clarify this in light of above comments. If anyone needs to know anything else about that, contact me personally so we don't take up room on the thread primarily for voting.

Sorry for the digression otherwise.

most Satanists don't actually worship Satan, LeVayian Satanism doesn't actually have deities at all.. theological Satanism is extremely tiny, to the point it is debatable if it exists beyond being symbolic.

either way, that's fine - also theological Satan is impossible to classify as a PE anyway as no matter what text you read he started as Lucider, the most beautiful and beloved of the angels - that alone prevents PE status.. nothing in Biblical texts can count as PE, really.. they all have a reason, purpose or fall from grace.. save some of the human antagonists but they are arguably still serving a role in some big cosmic scheme.

other texts have different standards but on the whole PE is ill-fitted for any theology character, to be honest, as it is already a minefield category and we don't need to plaster PE over theological characters to spark the "evillier than thou" thing.