Thread:BeholderofStuff/@comment-2059440-20181104050249/@comment-2175012-20181105215634

Mesektet wrote: I would argue the point or ask further about that sort of comparison, but, again, this is a different thread and as it is the reference runs the risk of derailing the topic at-hand. I will however say you still told me to stop asking about it or I would be removed, so it was not a "false statement", when you tell someone to stop asking questions and don't want to explain the intricacies of a logic that is unclear that is "Because I said so" logic. It is your right and I accept it, I can say nothing of your tone as this is all written out, but that is what was told to me and one of the reasons I try to follow major classifications that get weighed down in subjectivity before they get passed into law. And yes I understand, nothing personal, it is just the system.

Getting back to my original question, is that sort of objective "Plot-point A is caused by character B" a viable form of classification when the question of Antagonism comes up, QueenMisery?

Look, if I had offended you in anyway, I do apologize for losing my temper with being asked the same question repeatedly. While I may feel that you are overanalyzing some things, I do understand that you are entitled to believe whatever you want to believe. I would suggest maybe taking part in proposals on the Pure Evil thread to get a better way of figuring out how we run things here, but that's a whole other topic on itself.