User blog comment:Looperreallyreallysucks/Pure Evil Proposal: Alex (A Clockwork Orange)/@comment-38742312-20190628011827/@comment-34055410-20190628043129

What if the “no” vote is based on arguments that have nothing to do with the criteria (for instance: “I’m voting ‘no’ because his novel version doesn’t qualify, and both versions have to meet the criteria to count”, whereas the criteria states that villains can still qualify even if they don’t meet the criteria in every versions, or “I’m voting ‘no’ because he doesn’t do anything evil while he’s brainwashed”, even though it’s been established several times that villains can still qualify if they were brainwashed into becoming good, since they never chose to reform)? And if people just throw in “no” votes without any arguments, it’ll do nothing aside from causing confusion, and it would also be insulting, since it’s a blank downvote compared to paragraphs of arguments and tons of effort.