Thread:LORD LUCIFER MORNINGSTAR/@comment-36740624-20181231040657/@comment-36740624-20190102203020

Queen Misery wrote: no, absolutely not - we removed them many times before in the past.. regardless of how we feel they are actually defending their homes from attack, the cannibalism was part of a purification rite and only occured because Yates Crew etc defiled the jungle.

the tribe did not engage in such acts regularly, despite the crew's claims, they only did so when confronted by enemies who defiled their lands.

they gained a horrible reputation but it was just that, a reputation - the tribe allowed peaceful explorers into their home without incident and that's how the footage of Yates etc was recovered in the first place.

if treated well the tribe were not cannibalistic or hyper-violent - those traits were utilized in war situations to protect themselves, much like the tribe that lives on that Indian Island today.. who have survived for thousands of years due to driving out those that would harm them.

also the girl who was impaled - that was not likely to have been done by the tribe but by Yates as a staged atrocity.. think on it, mere moments after he gang-rapes her she is "found" by the group impaled and Yates is grinning before he sees the camera, then quickly gets "concerned" and talks about the "brutality" of the tribe and the practice of killing the woman.. I think it is heavily implied the tribe didn't kill her at all, Yates did it off-camera to make them seem even more "savage". They are still cannibals and rapists, not as bad as Alan, but they are and the rituals they have are terrible and amoral. You know Queen, you and this wiki starts to have something in common with TV tropes, some admins, moderators and users are non.sense and don't listen what other people tells them.

Not an insult, is the true. You can take it how you want to take it.