User blog comment:Magma MK-II/Characters that shouldn't be here, Part 3: Return of the Revenge/@comment-3581997-20160101101052

With the internet being what it is someone is always going to have issue with something. But allowing articles on just because someone doesn't like a character is fannon bait. The whole Ron Death Eater trope. So I really do agree with Love Robin, we need to take the rules seriously. Heck I would say we even need to tighten them when needed. Rather than asking whether Ruckus is a villain based on who doesn't and doesn't like him we just need to look at what problems he causes. An antagonist needs to antagonize after all.

And that being said, on the subject of Moses it isn't so much "You can't say that about Moses!" It's more "There is no problem listed that says what villainous acts he portrays." Why is Moses an antagonist, who is he antagonizing, who is the good guy being opposed in this story? There is none the article just goes on about how Moses is barbaric by today's standards. Why yes, yes he is, so what, where is the story he plays villain in? Is there a story about some Canaanite minding his/her own business when mean old Moses came in? Where is the story about Pharaoh who is being persecuted by the bad old Jews? It's all fannon. And if it's allowed, well how many idiots in the popular culture have no idea who Muhammad is and would just put him up here as some jerk who encourages terrorists? Can we put Jesus up here cause of all those people he "supposedly" told his followers to murder during the Dark Ages?

We need to stick roles in actual stories. Posting articles based on a contributor thinking someone is a jerk well lead to awful things.