Thread:B1bl1kal/@comment-4572161-20131101113546/@comment-15895329-20131102210303

Not acting like a kid are you? Then what on Earth would you call completely removing a post containing an argument you don't want to hear instead of actually responding to it? Because that sounds pretty immature to me.

And for the record, I was not calling you a kid, I was calling you out on blatantly immature behavior. And as for me, putting forth an argument and sticking with it is not "acting like a child". Demonizing me will not get me to back off my stance, because again, there is an argument to be made, and you are refusing to acknlowedge it or respond to any of the points I have made beyond just insisting that I'm wrong. So if you don't call that immature arrogance, then what is it pray tell? Because I'd love to know.

I'm not just going to accept that you're right when I have an argument to make that you are refusing to acknowledge or counter in any meaningful way. It is unfair therefore for us to automatically assume that you are right and that you get the last word.

So in the end the rationale I'm seeing here is that because you cannot actually provide ANY EVIDENTIAL MATERIAL to show that I am wrong it makes me an immature child. It's definitely a...creative assessment to be sure. And one I don't accept for a bloody second.

In any event, an admin has put forth an order and I will respect his authority. But I have not given up on this by any means. That page is in need of editing and until such time as you can give a solid argument to prove I am wrong I will stick with my stance. You can condemn me as immature and childish as much as you want, but that does not change a thing. If you believe you are right, the onus is on YOU to prove it. I've said my piece. Now it's your turn to challenge it in a meaningful way.