Thread:Love Robin/@comment-5889551-20160404042901/@comment-366087-20160404082511

As categories used as tags, so far they are still relevant.

For certain characters being Villains, being "mean", "Bully", or "Jerk" alone enough. Being an Antagonist is not always the same as being a Villain, and the former not enough for inclusion. Villains Wiki:Rules 6.3 explains the difference between "antagonist" and "villain".

6.4 explains that a character which is temporarily brainwashed or possessed is not valid. A good rule of thumb for a possession/brainwash is it should be significantly long and or entrenched enough as to be one of the first things to come to mind when thinking of that character. For example Darth Vader is valid. Ron Stoppable as "Zorpox" is not as he was reverted to normal very quickly. Nor Fluttershy as "Flutterbat", nor "Midnight Sparkle".

Normal "Predators", those which are presented as close to "normal" without *any* anthropomorphism (such as human-like reasoning even without human-like forms), basically mostly killing only for sustenance and acting according to their nature, are being dropped. An animal needs to be far more than normal, presented as having human-like reasoning and social structure in their franchise, and killing for sport/non-sustenance against what is expected of their natures. Examples: the dinos from the Primeval franchise were only depicted as "normal" killing machines, but Orca (Orca) was presented as motivated by vengeance for the deaths of his mate and unborn child (done by the camera closing in on its eye as the deaths occurred).

As for the characters you mentioned, Diamond Tiara was never more than a mean and snooty jerk.

IMO Stormy Weather—and any which Hawk Moth converts—fails 6.4 as none *ask* for the change, "Stormy" was frightened and tried to shield herself from the akuma, all are reverted, and most don't remember anything which happened. So *they* are no more villains than a sleepwalker is guilty of their actions while under.