Talk:Death (Supernatural)

Debate on Villain or Not
I'd actually argue he might stay because he's portayed at first as a villain then a necessary evil to keep balance in the universe. He's a very affable character but then decides before his apparent death tried to have Dean kill Sam. He's not a generic villain but meant to represent a character who has no problem with killing though he does good he's an amoral entity who claims he'll reap God last. Granted he's argued on bieing "Beyond Good and Evil" he wouldn't be the first considering mot of Lovecrafts creatures are portrayed as beyond mortal standards. He might not be our standard outright villain and help the Heroes at times but if I recall he is shown to of caused some death in a restraunt though if this is right I'm not sure we can say he purposly caused it or didn't truly care about doing it. He has helped the heroes and maybe even redeemed but in at least one case he was bound by a spell when he helped them. Is he pure evil? No. But overall he seems to be an amoral entity who's job is to reap souls (In his case its similar to a Punch Clock villain). I do agree howere he is a probably one of if not the most debatable of the Supernatural Villain here currently. What are others thoughts? Jester of chaos (talk) 16:27, February 8, 2016 (UTC)