Thread:Looperreallyreallysucks/@comment-29414935-20190122103335/@comment-29414935-20190208173234

Thanks.

Also can you help me with something?

I have now decided, that in my CIA agent story, the female archenemy of the protagonists is going to die. I wanted her to be kept alive in prison first, but it is the last chapter/part and I want to end the series. And she is a really nasty and terrible person, would her also consider as Pure Evil. Because she nuked multiple cities and is responsible for the pain of the both main protagonist brothers, also the one who ordered the murder of the son from one of the two protagonists. You can compare her to Ernst Stavro Blofeld and Solomon Lane. She also appears not from the beginning. She first is revealed in the third part where she explains that she was all that in the shadows and first she seemed like a comedic and heartful mayor of the city. Then when she tried to escape she is shot in the knee by the one protagonist and he is pointing the gun at her head, but don't shoot and let her be arrested. So now is the thing, why did he does that instead of killing her? I mean she is the cause of all his and his brothers pain. I first thought that he let her alive so she can suffer in prison than simple just die, she wanted to die (twisted psychology) or she was threatening him that her terror organisation will hunt them and everyone they love down if he would kill her. What would you think would be the best way to explain why he kept her alive? She comes back in the sixth part where she is rescued by her henchmen and then she make another plan to kill the both protagonists and to take over the world with other means. So she destroyed a life of a technician and blames the protagonists for it so he wanted revenge on them and work together with her, but is just used and manipulated. In the end, I thought first that both get arrested, but now I think it's better to kill her off. Because I think logically that she can break out of prison over and over again and make the same terrible things again and again so the protagonists suffer again and again. So I thought she was hardly injured by the technician after he realised that she just used him. And then after they defeat him, one of them (I don't know if the same protagonist who spared her life at first) walks in the room where she is and kills her once and for all. But before that, she says something like "If you kill me, you aren't better" and he response "I don't care" and shoots her. What did you think? Is that good?

I know archenemies, also Ernst and Solomon are still alive and kept alive everytime so they are return in the sequels and so on. But my story ends with this story, so I thought it would be more fitting. I have that same thing in another story (with the villain who tries to rape the girlfriend of the protagonist and abuses his own brother). I first thought to spare him because the protagonist wants to make him suffer in prison and he is a nihilist anyway so he don't care if he dies or not. But then I thought it is the last part, so why keep him alive if it's the end? So Iet his brother kill him for everything that he did to him. In my stories, villains who escaped prison ones are always going to die, because I see it logical that they would break out again and again or always have henchmen who rescues them. But you can also say they are moved to a high secured prison so they can't escape the second time.