Thread:Jester of chaos/@comment-26884760-20161107215251/@comment-26884760-20161114201103

but King Arthur is folklore, it was never really owned by any one writer - it dates back before writing.. it is oral history as much as any legend.. King Arthur as a vile king would only be due to one writer's adaptation of the legend, as far as I am aware King Arthur was not created as a fictional character, his origin lays in actual folklore.