Thread:LucidPigeons/@comment-1333547-20160426003216/@comment-26205772-20160426035801

Alright, time for some counterpoints...

Perverts: I wouldn't necessarily call him a "pervert." Experiencing attraction to something doesn't automatically mean you're a pervert - never mind the fact that scene was deliberately meant to woo K. Rool.

Sadists: Point taken. I do realize a good part of this is For the Evulz at best. The category can stay.

Bullies: This isn't so much due to K. Rool not fitting the category as it is the fact we've decided to redefine the category to normal bullies only so the category doesn't experience misuse. Every villain with some modicum of power over others will bully or intimidate them at some point or another.

Complete Monster: I'll agree that K. Rool is pretty nasty given his source material, but he doesn't go to the extent where he can be considered the absolute worst of the worst. What he engages in is slightly-above-standard villainy, and a Monster has to go the extra mile and then some in order to truly be considered as heinous enough.