Thread:Jester of chaos/@comment-31330278-20190813233236/@comment-31330278-20190915130754

1. The biggest reason he might count is trying to kill a man who saved him. When a gorilla is almost killing someone, you would expect the intended victim would thank his savior. He wasn't aware the animals are sentient for the same reason to colonialists weren't aware the natives are sentient. He's not just a poacher. He's a slave monger. The gorillas were meant to symbolize the Africans. With that said, i'll probably ask more people, and thanks for warning me.

2. Now when you say it, Rick and Sarah does able to find a common ground with an idealistic tiger whom father is the kind of person that will smear your blood all over the places for passing a message. Eagle Eyes/Tembo will probably respect her as a fellow badass. By "harder to people trusting him to lead them", you refer to certain VIEW people who plan to overthrow Grant for their own not particularly moral agenda?

3. Frederik is IMO a more definite PE candidate than Tublat. While technically not far from Napoleon, the novel gives us graphic details of tormenting his animals. Throwing a dog to the oven, starving his perfectly able cows (not just giving them peanuts. he wasn't giving them food at all), whipping an old horse to death, tying razors to fighting roosters' legs, and further details can be found at articles talking about Hitler. Napoleon was a cruel and sadistic pig, but at least he can claim he wanted to achieve things. Even throwing Boxer to the glue factory was for getting some whiskey. Frederik whipped his poor horse for kicks. That's the same reason why Tublat might count. Clayton and Queen La wanted power, riches and possession. Tublat just wanted to beat up everybody because it makes him feel stronger.