Thread:LucidPigeons/@comment-24859393-20160212040823/@comment-5819288-20160212125859

King Kong was a victim, the whole point of the original story was that mankind can be real assholes in regards to nature and King Kong is a symbol of nature, which humans harass and exploit, at their own peril.

You say Kong killed people, so would any great ape if angered / provoked, Kong acts like a silverback - he's aggressive because he lives in a hostile, savage land and needs to fight to survive.. Natives sacrificed people to Kong but what would he know other than "free food"?

Kong's rampage was due to being startled by flashing cameras and jeers by humans, he went on the instinct of a great ape - to fight off his attackers and seek a safe place to hide, it wasn't Kong's fault he was trapped in a populated city when that survival instinct kicked in.

If you go into a great ape territory and start harassing them is it really the fault of the silverback when he potentially beats you into a coma? no, it is your fault for being stupid enough to deliberately provoke such a response from an animal that is known for its intelligence and willingness to warn others when it is scared (beating chest, false charges etc).