Thread:LucidPigeons/@comment-24469175-20160228194417/@comment-26205772-20160515075349

Welp, it's a wiki, just like this one. And with free-range editing allowed, there's bound to be a surplus of users who misinterpret or don't understand the trope when writing an example. There's a reason why a lot of the site's policies are so strict, but even they can only cover so much.

Point is, when marking a villain as a Monster or considering a setting a Crapsack World, always make sure to base your judgment on something more solid than a glance. There's a reason why a lot of the characters you've marked as Monsters I've unmarked and a lot of the crapsack settings you've brought up to me I've challenged. I don't want to be harsh or anything, but a lot of the examples you've put forward for both have been questionable and don't seem to have much more than a brief skim of research put into them.