Thread:Jester of chaos/@comment-5754292-20170408012215/@comment-5754292-20170417200828

Now to be fair. Alot of people including myself feel like VW is way too particular about who can and can't qualify as a villain. Something that I'venever understood is the status of villain is debated all the time but hero's not so much. For example villains that have been debated for years are Mr. Slate from the Flintstones,  Cosmo Spacely from The Jetsons and Elmer Fudd from Looney Tunes. Two of those  antagonists are generic bad boss characters and the other is a hunter. But unlike Clayton or Mcleach,  Elmer Fudd is hunting Bugs and Daffy out of sport. He's not poaching or trying to make a profit of them. Now compare these antagonists to these protagonists, Celestia from My Little Pony Friendship Is Magic,  Super Mario and Snow White from Snow White And The Seven Dwarves. One line from Fairly Odd Parents that I haven't forgotten about comes from The Crimson Chin who says "anyone with the power to stand up for what's right can be a hero." Meaning that you can be just a regular person but if you stand up for good you're a hero. One of the backlashs fans have had is that these three heroes had little to no character development Celestia especially in fact that is one of the reasons why fans really enjoyed the first episode of Season 7 was because of the development of Celestia as a character. But if we take the logic of VW and apply it to heroes then I suppose that Celestia, Mario, and Snow White are "just protagonists" in the same way that Cardinal Winchester or Sharpay are "just antagonists"  so let's take Crimson Chins quote and apply it to villains I feel like a lot of think that anyone with the power to stand up for what's wrong should qualify as a villain. Sorry for this post being so long but I really wanted to get this point across and I hope you understand that I'm not trying to get you to change the rules just stating my opinion.