Those we're keeping the "villains" extension for.

<p>Here's another thing I thought we could do: clean out the "Theatrical Villains" category, as many have been putting villains NOT from theater productions in it. </p>

there's videos about villains they put in hmv double trouble

<p>Okay, I've created Parody/Homage, so I'll need help moving the Parody Villains to it. </p>

<p>Double trouble: Loki as James, demona from Gargoyles as Jessie and the joker as meow, other villains dr raichi from dragon ball, the ghost warriors freezer, cooler, slug and Turles, villains from power rangers, the jokerz from Batman beyond and villains from disney </p>

<p>That's not the concern of this board. Please take that to the "Fun and Games" board, this is for cleanup and management. </p>

<p>On the subject of Cleanup do we actually need Spoiled Brats? I personally believe we should just get rid of it as that's more of just an antagonistic trait that is thrown around way too often. People have abused it by adding it to murderers, Egotistical / Arrogant characters, and it honestly doesn't seem to important. Even the page quote's character isn't a villain and might give the impression that just being a brat or jerk itself is OK to add a page here. Adults shouldn't even be listed as a brat as Inferno Pendragon rightfully put on this thread as an adult who acts like a brat more than likely has physiological and or developmental issues. I have been thinking on if I should even suggest this or not due to it might just be me who thinks so but after a few days still believe we should just delete it. </p>

Agreed on dropping Spoiled Brats

<p>I'm against using Spoiled Brats for adult characters, even in fiction, because it is meant to be only for young children and even then it's kind of controversial on what child counts.. many children termed as "brats" are actually suffering from varied issues that were not seen as valid back when "Spoiled Brat" was invented. </p><p>it's still a big debate with no right or wrong answers, it is very possible for young children to be spoiled by poor discipline or excessive wealth / power.. however it is equally possible they have issues that have nothing to do with being "spoiled". </p><p>I also stand by my statement that a character that tantrums and so forth well into 30s is NOT a brat as they have developmental issues or similar - I know this because I personally have some mild developmental issues and can't control certain behaviors well.. I wouldn't call my an "Adult Brat", since such a term would be ridiculous except in extremely rare circumstances (like if an adult was raised exclusively in some royal house, never having to "grow up" - they could arguably be a "brat" but on the other side of the coin they are still developmentally delayed, due to environment). </p>

<p>Don't we have Extravagant for the adult version of this anyway? </p>