95,545
pages
ALL POSTSAnimal villains that should be brought back because they're unique, if you know what I'm talking about
<p>Villains such as "amimals needing food to stay alive", they're smarter than your average animal. Animals who ACTUALLY NEED food are just plain stupid, in figuritive terms. I suggest you do research on animal behavior before saying that this makes no difference. It DOES make a difference. Some like JP 3's velociraptor's set a trap that's NOT NORMAL. Needing food to survive is ALWAYS normal, not strageized like humans. I know a lot of animals needing food DO have strategies, but the animals in fiction make them look human AND evil. Sorry for continuing this chat, but I still find these "animal not villain" rules outrageous, which I haven't told you before, or did I say something like that before? I'm not a zoologist, so this animal not villain stuff is becoming even more confusing for me and us, though you still need to look again, cause you might have missed something, even if its ultra super tiny. We all make mistakes, but I think you all need to hear me out. That's all I'm asking for now, so I hope I CAN make a difference about this outrageous stuff about animals not villain. P.S.: Sorry for all these caps locks, I just wanted to make a bigger point than before.
</p>
(Edited by administrators)
<p>Well, a bear can be a ferocious animal.
</p>
(Edited by administrators)
Maybe a dragon can be a dangerous creature.
(Edited by administrators)
<p>Especially The Bear from The Fox and The Hound! He was scary as crud! He was 100% evil, sort of like Pinocchio's Monstro, but more vicious. despite being smaller. Did the bear scare you when you were a kid? 'Cause I HATED that bear!
</p>
(Edited by administrators)
A lion can eat a zebra.
(Edited by administrators)
<p>Scar is an obvious example, even though he's pure evil.
</p>
(Edited by administrators)
I think the wolf might also be dangerous.
(Edited by administrators)
<p>An example would be Beauty and The Beasts' wolves, they're pure evil, even though they can't talk. ALL fictional animals are true villains. I know about the whole franchise/narrative stuff Love Robin said, but franchises and narratives make no difference. People need to look again to get a better idea of true animal villainy.
</p>
(Edited by administrators)
<p>Sadly, i think i have to take your argument and throw it in a trashbag, because from what i can see, the wolves don't even have an article on this wiki.
</p>
(Edited by administrators)
<p>Not yet they don't. Didn't they guard a castle with evil intentions? I am trying MY VERY BEST to keep my argument alive and active. What REALLY deserves to be put in the trashbag is my Mushu Mulan II argument. You were all correct, Mushu is a HERO, NOT a villain.
</p>
(Edited by administrators)
There was a mysterious hunter in ''Bambi''.
(Edited by administrators)