95,456
pages
ALL POSTSAnimal villains that should be brought back because they're unique, if you know what I'm talking about
<p>Villains such as "amimals needing food to stay alive", they're smarter than your average animal. Animals who ACTUALLY NEED food are just plain stupid, in figuritive terms. I suggest you do research on animal behavior before saying that this makes no difference. It DOES make a difference. Some like JP 3's velociraptor's set a trap that's NOT NORMAL. Needing food to survive is ALWAYS normal, not strageized like humans. I know a lot of animals needing food DO have strategies, but the animals in fiction make them look human AND evil. Sorry for continuing this chat, but I still find these "animal not villain" rules outrageous, which I haven't told you before, or did I say something like that before? I'm not a zoologist, so this animal not villain stuff is becoming even more confusing for me and us, though you still need to look again, cause you might have missed something, even if its ultra super tiny. We all make mistakes, but I think you all need to hear me out. That's all I'm asking for now, so I hope I CAN make a difference about this outrageous stuff about animals not villain. P.S.: Sorry for all these caps locks, I just wanted to make a bigger point than before.
</p>
(Edited by administrators)
<p>Yes.
</p>
(Edited by administrators)
<p>Well, a crocodile can occasionally eat people.
</p>
(Edited by administrators)
<p>And destructive when attacking cities, not caring about innocent people. P.S.: I'm not sure if crocs eat people. P.S.S.: King Kong isn't a normal gorilla.
</p>
(Edited by administrators)
Some animals can be destructive and savage at times.
(Edited by administrators)
<p>Depends on fiction or reality.
</p>
(Edited by administrators)
Isn't a warthog a dangerous animal?
(Edited by administrators)
Doesn't it have a grotesque appearance?
(Edited by administrators)
<p>Being scary does not a Villain make. Being antagonistic is not always the same as being a villain.
</p><p>Animals which do what they *normally do*, both in Real Life and their fictional narrative—such as the <i>Jurassic Park's</i> Big One—is not enough to qualify as villains.
</p><p>My dogs guarding my house will bite strangers which trespass. Are they villains? Let's say for a moment *I'M* a villain and I have guard dogs… would *they* be villains simply because I am?
</p><p>Now, we don't do Real Life Villains, but *if* we did, a prime example of a villainous dog MIGHT be the one which attacked that toddler that Tara the Hero Cat chased off.
</p><p>One of the major key elements of being a Villain is *Intent*. There <i>must</i> be intent. It <i>must</i> be Malicious. The character <i>must</i> be Wicked Doing Evil. "Normal" animals do not have such intent UNLESS the narrative shows they do. And that is generally Anthropomorphized animals. Not anthro'd? Probably not a villain.
</p><p>If you have not done so by now, read the Rules. Especially Section 6.
</p>
(Edited by administrators)
<p>I was only asking Super Poison Ivy if the bear scared her when she was a kid! ;Cause he did scare me! P.S.: I just made several examples on how fictional animals can be truely evil.
</p>
(Edited by administrators)
I am not scared.
(Edited by administrators)