85,167
pages
ALL POSTSPE Approvals
<p>First off I wanna say I'm very proud of the progress that has been going on in the Pure Evil Blog posts. I feel they've worked out better than the discussions and I regret I haven't been more involved. But anyways, I've noticed people proposing villains in PE blog posts that were accepted before the rules, and I think that's a great idea because it assures that none will be removed and we can continue to stand our own ground regardless of TV Tropes. So I recommend all users go through villains added prior to the rules (obviously those that weren't approved evil) and propose them in blog posts (or remove I guess depending on what you think of them) to keep them as grounded as we are for the ones proposed after the rules.</p>
(Edited by BeholderofStuff)
<p>What BigBadSquid said.</p><p>
</p>
</p>
<p>Ok, i did a EP on Bertron from DC who is already on PE.</p>
<p>wait a minute why is it that all these characters that are already Pure Evil proposal approved even though there are no comments or just created</p>
<p>That are the rules now, ask Prime.</p>
<p>Villains that are already PE will be approved right away without votes. Why? Because there villains that are not PEs and need more attention of the users than those who already are Pure Evils.</p>
(Edited by Sirin of the Void)
<p>Also, i did a proposal on Fenris (DC) some minutes ago, sorry if i'm spamming.</p>
<p>He was approved already or it's a new candidate?</p>
<p>He's a new candidate, who doesn't even have a page here yet.</p>
<p>I feel like people still need to vote on candidates that are already PE, and here's why: before the "PE proposal" rules were established, PE gets abused a lot, and other users can miss it sometimes and fail to revert the abuse, so if people vote on characters who were already added before the rules, we can formally confirm the character's status as Pure Evil.</p>
<p>True, but we have Removal proposals for that matter, and they don't distract users from voting for other proposals.</p>