Hello,
What is the reason for omitting central antagonists and roles nowadays?
Thanks
Hello,
What is the reason for omitting central antagonists and roles nowadays?
Thanks
That’s stupid
Roles sections are getting removed because of antagonist fussing.
🤦♂️ that’s no fun
There's much more to a villain than what roles they play in a show, movie, video game, etc., antagonist fussing basically involves reducing what makes the character so unique and interesting into a subjective label. Both of these decisions were to reduce that.
The reason why the roles sections had gotten removed was because people kept piling up all of the different roles a character played in a movie, even if it was just a cameo or a minor role. This got espescially bad for villains who never stopped being the main or overarching antagonist of a franchise where all of that was more like fluff added onto the article.
Central got removed because people kept treating it as separate from "secondary", and tended to use it as a form of loophole abuse to promote or demote characters they did or didn't like, obviously leading to more chaos than necessary.
The fussing is what annoys me the most. It’s unnecessary. Shouldn’t have happened.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but you kind of engaged in it yourself by reverting Vader back all those times, even though it was ruled that central can't be used. You even said it yourself.
🤷♂️ whatever
Basically, this, happened
Can anyone else not see the image i can't
This is done to reduce the constant amount of antagonist fussing and edit wars it has brought up, over and over. It's time for us to start understanding there's more to editing on this wiki than just fighting over antagonist labels.
@KingValeska Please refrain from reporting people's comments, unless they're breaking the guidelines. I'm not going to delete posts just because they share an opinion you don't agree with.