Cool story bro
That makes no sense however I look at it. It speaks more about how evil you are if you have the choice to be good or evil and actively pick evil.
I feel like an argument could be made that such an entity is Made of Evil, and thus fails the moral agency requirement.
Why is this a poll?
A Pure Evil character does not truly love anyone, romantically or platonically.
Yes, PE villains can pretend to be good. Look at Light Yagami, for instance.
Light Yagami did significantly lower the crime rate.
@Squirrely the Horrible Then what the fucking fuck are you talking about?
Yes.
This is kinda like an election. That Armstrong is currently winning only adds to that.
Out of the ones listed, Relius, I suppose, but Hazama will always reign supreme in my eyes.
Cinder Fall.
Absolutely fucking based.
And rather than reading the page to find out, you went and made this post?
And also, he was intended to be a redeemable anti-villain, but the writing was botched that hard.
Homelander raped Billy's wife.
I mean, she was an arrogant, smug jerk, that I'll admit any day. But she was a well-written one.
The page itself gives a very clear definition. To quote it verbatim:
"A beautiful, seductive, but ultimately villainous, woman who uses the malign power of her sexuality in order to ensnare the hapless hero into danger."
And yet, I see it used all the time on female villains who just happen to be attractive, seduction and temptation be damned.
The same goes for the Seductress category on the Heroes Wiki. What's up with that?
