All posts by The Pro-Wrestler
We're keeping them seperate because they are pretty much seperate by this point especially with Rise of the Beasts. Barring facts like Bee, Optimus and the other Autobots arriving only by the present day of the 2007 film, taking place far after the 90s, the biggest plot point in The Last Knight is how "Earth was formed around Unicron" while Rise of the Beasts focuses on "stop Unicron from arriving and devouring Earth".
They physically cannot be under the same canon
Sentinel deserved to die but he was not worth D's soul.
D-16/Megatron never had the mental fortitude to stop with just Sentinel and jut seconds before didn't care a missed shot hit a building that sees it crumble and nearly crush civilians below so I'm in the camp where he wasn't justified. It's a perfect case of how asshole victims don't make the act justified either due to the circumstances around it
First off, discussing about Pure Evil villains has no place on the discussion threads.
Second off, whitelisted users are not errand boys to do favours for you.
Third off, I can literally dismiss majority of them with just one sentence which shows how unfit you are to be part of the whitelist.
PAL - Far too comedic. Her death is literally a meme reference
Thunderclap - Way, way below the baseline
Horner - I wish but his main selling points for heinousness are exaggerated for comedic threats, not straight enough for PE.
Chester V - Again, too comedic for the trope.
Mimic - Wait and see for his arc
Vaati - Tons of Zelda villains are worse than him.
Madame Grape - Not heinous enough.
Red Skull - Already approved
Your old blog detailing this was deleted for a reason (that it is not allowed)
I'm leaving you off with a warning to not pull such stunts again.
Eren's the only one I can plausibly see be actually nice to kids.
Far better than Makima or Johan who are easily the worst choices to hand your kids over of the lot because what we already have in canon.
You know there is always that one wheel in the shopping cart that just acts like it has it's own mind and just derails everything.
He and Vaatu are that one wheel.
Nope. What all Scud does is jsut exactly what a dog does. Nothing a tually immoral or anything, even if dangerous to the toys. End of discussion
Squidward is not consistently portrayed as villainous enough to count. Whenever Squidward does do actual crimes, it is mere out of character moments.
Mr. Krabs counts as a villain mostly due to the criminal acts he would get to in order to slake his greed is made far more consistent.
Yeah, ever since the entire stunt with Vecna where we made the mistake of assuming the writers know the concept of "consistency", I'd rather wait until the Mind Flayer's arc actually comes to a close to formally propose him as we have no idea if the character trajectory we foresee is actually what would happen.
After all we as it is had proposed him when Season 3 was out, had to cut him out in favour of the reveal that he was just Vecna's creation, and then realized it was the complete opposite. We wait till we finish. We don't want a 3rd cirus.
I've done some digging and I... haven't seen anything of such sort here.
That's what I meant by glorious.
He has an actual presence, and the story also knew when it is high time to get rid of him when he no longer has a role in the story to play, and so gloriously dies.
This is unlike Kenjaku, who perhaps carried the Culling Games arc to be an actually good villain, was just killed off way too early just when he was getting interesting, or Sukuna... who while very cool at first, now his just lost any luster pulling frustrating ass-pull after ass-pull to win. The dude's an unbearable Villain Sue by this point.
No. People having phobias aren't what we consider cowards.
Cowards are dishonorable guys who excessively fear for their life and prefer to run or hdie in danger.
I only have one response for this:
Read the proposal. It is not that hard, and posts like this only insult the hard work the proposer did.
Yeah... on the level that PG-13 films have. Nothign extraordinary.
Why?
Like all of them are clearly just PG-13 at best. The franchise rarely dips deep into seriously graphic content to warrant a template we reserve for R-rated villains
@Mr. Famine The wiki is in fact not on your side for this aggression. Consider this block a little wake up call.
BTW @Funtik1312 your posts were deleted because they have nothing to do with the subject of villains at all. Wanna make posts, make posts on villains.
And I am putting an end to this post here and now.
If you feel a characters counts as a villain, jsut create a page, especially in no-brainers like this.
No admin unblocked you. Your block jsut expired.
And that is not why you got blocked. It was because you were spending your time whining about being blocked on external wikis and if you are gonna be making such slanderous posts out of a victim complex, you deserve another term in the hole.
Yep