All posts by The King Peacock

You can easily find full of them by checking on the Rapist category page.

Yeah I agree Squidward is too inconsistent. He commits an act who could be considered villainous one time in a span of 100 episodes. It is way too much minor and inconsistent for him to have a page on the Wiki.

No

I can't modify my comment so I'll continue to detail my previous one and develop new ones. What also makes me think Zimforth is that the arguments for him not being real seem to be more speculation than the ones for him being real.

• If I'm right, it is extremely rare, if not non-existent, someone as old as Ralph undergoes a sudden psychosis like in the game (if it is one) as you said. It may be a simulation of his part, but that seems extremely unlikely.

• Zimforth has certainly the power to show himself to the people he wants to be seen. Since he is a sadistic god, Zimfort does not want to warn Ralph from his wrath if he has the slightest doubt about his "mission". His sadism is probably the reason for the earthquake and the headaches Ralph has when he disobeys. Zimforth doesn't need a bible, a church or a cult. He just needs weak people to sacrifice people for him.

• Zimforth is evil and sadistic. C'mon, just some people who died in the earthquakes aren't enough to satisfy his bloodlust. Because of this, I unfortunately doubt Zimforth will stop after Ralph's dead. He will search for another similar person and repeat the same thing again :-(.

• As with many evil, psychopathic, and sadistic people, Zimforth is a coward who is too afraid to target mentally strong people or multiple people at times (what do you think about this, Pennywise?). Since Zimforth isn't as strong as he claims (as I said in my previous comment), he targeted the weak-willed Ralph by preying on him and said he is special and needs to carry a mission on his behalf. Pretty sure he acted affable at first, but showed his true colors when Ralph began to show hesitation.

• I'm pretty sure Zimforth cannot do damage on a world or universe-scale. He just lied to Ralph to scare him. If he was able to do so, I think he wouldn't have bothered with a single person and instead would have targeted a whole nation or planet. I guess the max he can do is create a large but limited earthquake.

So I've watched this dark gameplay. After reading the post and thinking about it, I'm more on the side Zimforth is a real entity. Sorry if it isn't really developed, I'll develop my hypothesis further the next days.

• The purple color is the biggest argument in his existence's favor. I think he is some of eldritch entity manifesting in the form of purple smoke trail. Beside, why the lamp would suddenly changed color? IIRC, Johnny didn't see it.

• I think it's no coincidence Ralph feels hurt the moment he disregards Zimforth's orders. Zimforth takes advantage of his fear and reminds him who he is in charge. You raise a good comparison with Bill Cipher. He isn't as strong as he claims.

• Rest TBA

Having watched some scenes of Bill, I always thought him claiming to be omniscient was self-aggrandizing. He quite forgets or overlooks a lot of things for being omniscient, the latest being Stanely's trick when he entered in his mind, which proves to be his undoing or when he can't remember the combination of Stanford's safe. Although he technically has some godlike powers, his powers are far below of those of a Supreme Being. In fact, he is part of some race who were living in a world, but wiped them for having flat minds with flat ideas. Oh, and his promise of bringing a world where everything is possible? Just a ruse hiding his intention of creating an universe of pure chaos.

Awesome and detailed analysis, Reval!

On my part, it's Byron Hadley from the movie Shawshank Redemption.

Best to report him to an admin.

If the villain switched to villainy again, then yeah he counts as On & Off.

By sympathetic, you mean Anti-Villains?

I don't know but have you voted to some proposals before?

Kaecilius isn't dead.

Ah okay

I'm confused. Are they canon or not?

Well, based on your info, I've no issue for a removal on Bateman

AUTO from WALL-E

You must also be whitelisted and demonstrate a decent knowledge of the PE criterias. This can be done mostly by voting on some proposals.

@Inferno Pendragon I agree totally with you. The only thing is the proposals, if done correctly and honestly, take some time and efforts to do and I think when an user put said time and effort to make a good proposal, then see it stolen just before he publish it, it is kind of frustrating.

Honestly, agree with the to-do-lists. However, each user whitelisted should put maximum 4-5 candidates at the same time to not have ones who have 20 candidates but only do 5 and stop doing proposals after them.

Here's my stance on this. While I agree that the template is abused at times, I'm opposed to wait a week for articles with less than 5 sentences to be improved because it will be hard to keep track of all the articles made within a week.