Not making a new category or anything, genderless is to cover any characters who lack biological sex be it energy beings, robots, A.I.’s and similar entities even if they have a personality or traits akin to male or female. If a character changes gender like a real life scenario we go by their current gender from what I can tell.
Bill Cipher is honestly debatable as little to nothing indicates he’s physically impossible to describe. For an example Ahriman from
Prince of Persia given we only see very vague details and implied he may be indeed formless.
Angelica stole her mother’s identity played a villain in many retelling within show (which is a big reason she barely counts) and helped Coco in her scheme to have the babies kidnapped for a time until she could succeed in her scheme all for the promise to have a parade about her. DW doesn’t do that or push it from what I saw.
Go to your profile and it will show a blog tab.
For any character of your own creation vs official works or well-known parodies.
If you mean pages on your own character then no, you can use your user pages or personal blogs for them though.
Clear counts like say Palpatine and Westcott, characters that were basically discussed but not given a formal effort post not just because they were clear cases but for examples (we only did a few I believe but both were under it long before proposals and absolutely no one had any arguments against them).
Given one user showers the hints of just adding the templates it isn’t allowed. Only admins add the templates and while some were auto approved now. It only happens through blogs. The reason some are under it it simply before the proposals were a thing it could be added, when the proposal system was made it then was made to where they can’t be added or removed with out proposals (now blatant abuse can be removed if no proposals were made either way but even then only admins and we rarely do it). The ones who are under it beforehand generally stay until a proposal for removal is made or a proposal for them is rejected,
Vitiate by a long shot, honestly he’s arguably as bad as Palpatine if not potentially worse.
While he counts I’d say Joel Miller. He’s a man that lost his daughter only hours after his birthday and went decades surviving essentially a zombie apocalypse which he basically admitted to doing evil, the main reason he’s here is how the game ends in what boils down to a major debatable choice which is why he’s a grey zone: let a group of morally ambiguous individuals harvest the brain of his adopted daughter (Ellie) for a vaccine or take the only chance for what remains to create one for humanity away.
Now the story basically uses vaccine and cure interchangeably but it’s a vaccine for a mutated fungus which the real world can’t make and technology basically stoping in 2013 for the setting. One could argue he doomed humanity while others can argue it would of been a reckless and doomed to fail. The sequel makes it clear Ellie is angry as she feels survivors guilt and mad he lied to her vs giving her a choice but at the same time the group didn’t even tell her beforehand merely put her to sleep then went straight for it. The group itself does show recklessness and borderline to outright terrorists but have some intentions to supposedly spread the vaccine and gain favor from the survivors with the government being basically a police state so said group and Joel both do things at best morally questionable beyond just survival thus belong here but some logs hint the scientist for said group aren’t that bright.
Parents or those who have ever been in a similar role can easily see the choice as understandable as most parents wouldn’t be willing to let their child die and even the scientist per sequel is stumped when questioned on if it were his daughter. Joel represents the choice of “my child first” while the leader Marlene (recently added due to questionable actions of of her group an for those unaware basically played a mother like role or at minimum aunt to Ellie) clearly is upset/conflicted but chooses to risk Ellie due to believing it “for the greater good”.
So yeah I find both a Joel and Marlene while here some of the most grey zone types. I have a few others but figured I’d stop after this long one. XD
Ellie I’m not sure but Joel is for potentially dooming humanity (although unclear if they were even competent enough to make a vaccine given logs) and a lot of at best questionable actions including a criminal record (he was a smuggler) not simply for killing in the situation. I haven’t played The Last of Us 2 but I only heard of one moment potentially pushing her and even then she wasn’t intentionally or aware of it at the time the woman was pregnant.
One book implied that the canon secret is when he said that it would indeed happen and then the incantation in the show. It’s left with some debate especially when it sends with a shot of Bill’s body and then a scavenger hunt which will not canon gives the indication he still exists.
Not necessarily as it can be just from a characters perspective or from drama can actually addressing the audience themselves
No, he’s been discussed a lot in the past with ultimately some of his extremely dark methods such as torture pushing him to counting.
Dimentio’s comment seems less directed at the actual player and more a taunt to demean the heroes, Vox and Kefka I know don’t break the 4th wall.
Yeah they weren’t willingly helping the other or under completely different conditions than the other implied.
A minion is one who willingly and knowing works for someone, a pawn is unaware and merely tricked.
That’s simply being delusional he still has the choice in what he does.
It’s a flashback and one that is debatable if real or simply a hallucination on Pamela given if she were around when it happened she would of jumped in to save him. I could honestly see him counting as mute given in the present and a villain we never hear him give anything but a growl or grunt when actually hurt. I mean we have at least one other who are given one minor quote in a flashback when someone tries to give medical treatment even if not easy to hear and yes that character does count given not only described as such in universe but that is only one scene with even then very hard to make out.
Without moral agency they are simply following their nature thus can’t be held fully responsible as its not a matter of choice, Pure Evils can choose either way and just prefer their evil deeds.