I tried adding a villain infobox to this page https://villains.fandom.com/wiki/Rachel_(The_Simpsons) and it didn’t work. Can somebody fix it please?
Nothing he does passes the heinous standard. So many other villains outdo his actions, brutal kills won't change that.
Mickey didn't plan to frame any innocents, he outright wanted to be caught.
Her original proposal was deleted for plagiarism.
Bill has too much of an "Evil is Cool" vibe, Pacifica has massive character development and Gideon is too funny to hate and redeemed himself.
The brainwashing of the guinea pigs isn't even fridge horror, it's pretty clear it isn't harming them.
Thanks.
I tried adding a villain infobox to this page https://villains.fandom.com/wiki/Rachel_(The_Simpsons) and it didn’t work. Can somebody fix it please?
To troll us.
That was only in the trailer.
Also his attempted slavery relies on fridge horror, as how bad the slavery would be is not shown.
Like how Grodus gets more focus than the Shadow Queen.
No.
A secondary antagonist is the second most important villain. A central antagonist is someone who drives a good chunk of the plot, but isn't the main villain.
Donald Love is a Homage, not a Parody.
Literally the only thing that makes him a Hate Sink is him doing his job of being a TV show host. Mocking people is what TV show hosts do.
For voting on Pure Evil proposals you need to be active for 3 or 5 months and gain 300 edits.
For voting on who is going to be headlined there’s no requirement, you can vote on anybody.
Yeah, but this is for who's the darkest Illumination villain, not the most heinous.
Why are people voting Bratt? I can't think of a single scene where he was played seriously.
Because his actions outweigh his tragedy.
No, most of his bad acts were out of being naive rather than malicious intent.