Almost got it confused with loki lol
Nothing because i don't play RE
Probably, i think randal flagg falls under that category
Someone "true neutral" wouldn't have became a villian or a hero in the first place
> Elizabeth murders because her father is William, a serial killer who only ever cared about his twisted hobby. So maybe, just maybe, following in his footsteps will make him proud of her
One of the most cliche tropes, which is not a bad thing by itself, but it's executed *very* poorly, hell, not even chirs nolan could executive it properly, scott is not to blame, but this trope doesn't work 80% of the time. Also, Elizabeth has no backstory,except for that she dies and now she is evil. That's bad writing, nothing else. I'm not saying she needs joker level character development, but at least give some reason to why she goes mad.
> And Vanny kills because she is literally not in control of her actions, Glitchtrap/Afton is. She's possessed. She doesn't want to hurt anyone.
Which is still the same thing. Also, her character is barley developed, meaning that you can barley understand anything. Also i get that it's meant to be theorized, but at least give us something to know that she is a 3rd dimension character not just another antagonist for the sake of having one.
I can somewhat understand the animatronic gang, however, there are still many flaws (like the ones i mentioned before)
Slenderminion Then why do they attack you? You don't play as their murderer in any of the games (Except maybe in fnaf 1 but keep in mind that the game wasn't meant to have a lore, and it's messy too, why can't they just be in release order or more clear?)
> Elizabeth wants to earn her father's love and approval
So she murders people? Because? Im not asking for a complicated motivation, but just make things a little more clear. Mystery for the sake of mystery doesn't work in this scenario
>Vanny is brainwashed and desperately tries to regain control of her consciousness
Again, what reason does she have to kill? They are by definition evil for the sake of evil, because their motivation is poor and underdeveloped. The "lore" wasn't even a thing until the third game, so many things don't make sense. Instead of making a prequel that explains many things, the game devs made cash grabs. Not to mention that the whole "lore" is fan service, and so it's more messy
Obluda511 i agree that joker is overrated but he does have some great (origin?) stories, like the killing joke, joker 2019, and many more. However, DC should use other villians who are in my opinion more interesting, like riddler, man bat, penguin, and two face
Any fnaf villians and Kronika from mortal combat. They are basically evil for the sake of evil and lack any real motivation