All posts by Lucariobot

I will clarify some things, when I replied to LR's message what I said was that X9 would be kept a close eye on if she was unbanned on account of the fact that there had been issues before, in other words even in the event X9 is declared innocent things will not 'start anew' in the sense that issues before the start of the whole thing will just be treated like they never happened, and given how much has happened I shall point out that a lot of waters have been muddied due to how high emotions were running throughout this whole thing so I shall state some facts and let people make of them as they will.

LR specifically mentioned how unpleasant a lot of the accusors were which would've applied to the people who went out of their way to harass X9, now should LR had looked into things more regardless of the fact that there was harassment involved? Absolutely, but one thing I pointed out is that the people who engaged in the harassment are not representative of everyone who makes the accusations, those who are staff simply believed what Ruby shared and that was what led them to make the decisions they did, to conflate the people who escalated the whole thing needlessly with these people is where issues lie.

As for stuff like how things were a personal attack against X9, a part of that is due to a lack of context on things, when it comes to screenshots of people talking bad about her on discord being sent to her message wall by a troll-only account, we were against that simply because our job is to minimise drama, that's all there is to it, there are other examples I could get into but there's so much to read through and I can't eaxctly be bothered to do it all in one post and the whole thing is super chaotic so I kind of have to do things only a bit at a time.

@X9 The Android I did not say that, I’m here saying simply to stop escalate things more than necessary because things have gotten way out of control and apparently I have to step in to force users to stop adding fuel to this fire.

I shall clarify, we have the rule on not feeding trolls/vandals for a reason which means don’t escalate things in general, this is a job for admins alone to handle.

Everyone shut up and let me handle the rest.

Surely you can think of a better use of the discussions board, consider yourself warned.

Read the rules on requesting.

This is an obvious troll thing, do not comment on them, just report and be done with it, that's what the rules say to do.

Wait for the movie to release.

Not true, whitelisted users can comment on this stuff.

Take it to the Villains Fanon Wiki as linked above.

A. This isn't the place for fanfiction, try Villains Fanon Wiki.

B. This is said in the rules 'It is both annoying and insulting when a user shows up only to say things like "Why nobody made 'X' page yet?" or "Please make a page for 'X'", so please do not go harassing other users asking them to do things for you. If you think there should be a page for a particular character, by all means, go ahead and make it yourself.'

This is nothing that hasn't been officially discussed, also him being on some other wiki has no bearing on anything here.

Yes, 300 edits is the voting requirement.

It's not a matter of just being too short, it's a matter of needing to actually put in effort from the get-go rather than creating a one-line article which specifically refers to pages that have almost 0 content in them, not to mention the reason we have the 'one-line' template is to warn people to put in more content within a short amount of time, if it's a a matter of not having that much time on your hands try creating drafts in a sandbox before publishing a page that is up to the wiki's standards, then you can get a page with sufficient content and then you shouldn't have to worry about it being deleted for being so lacking since you've had plenty of time to refine it in private.

To address an earlier point, there's such a thing as being evil in actions but not personality and motives AKA an anti-villain which is allowed on this wiki and Darth Vader does fit the bill of an anti-villain.

We aren’t changing the definition and name based on what someone thinks of it, especially when the definition we used hasn’t caused any issues, besides we are very strict on new categories to begin with.