If you're referring to the magnificent baddie wiki, that wiki is affiliated with this and therefore is fine to link to on pages.
I mean, perfection doesn't really exist. These wikis aren't perfect, I'm not perfect, nothing is. It's just a matter of "is something good" or "is something bad" and if you like the heroes wiki then use it, and if you don't then don't.
Probably the most practical thing to do would be to take them hostage and use them as a way to coerce the hero into doing what you wish. Unless you have someone who's either anti-heroic or simply hates their girlfriend and dates them begrudgingly.
Thanks everyone!
Oh yeah, the cake how did I forget?
This is assuming you know absolutely nothing about the character other than how they look. Which one in this condition would be the most surprising for you to be told is a villain? Let me explain all of these in case someone somehow doesn't get them:
Dahlia Hawthorne has an angelic appearance that you'd expect to only fit on a good character.
Lots-O'-Huggin' Bear is a literal Teddy Bear.
Clarance is an admittedly adorable looking dog.
Even if you somehow know nothing about Superman, you'd expect anyone who looks like that to be the hero of the story, or at least a major one. And if you know who Superman is but not that version specifically, then you'd expect him to be a hero considering that's what he typically is.
Puffy Fluffy seems like an innocent little fluffball at first, and I'll let y'all figure out how disturbing it's true form is.
As for Horned King... Come on! He clearly looks like an innocent little soul who would never do anything wrong! In fact, why did I even put him on here? It's so obvious based off his appearance alone there's absolutely no way he could possibly be evil.
72 Votes in Poll
@AAArvore that's so over the top there's no way it's serious. If it is serious, it's easily one of the most unintentionally hilarious things I've ever seen on the internet. Edit: Apparently it was serious. Still unintentionally hilarious though.
Anyways, here's my roast. He's an irredeemable monster! What, someone in the film already called him that? Dang, I really need to be more original.
Gru because his redemption feels more realistic than the other three. Once they redeem they're mostly/exclusively on the side of good, while Gru still has problems with doing bad things from time to time even after his redemption. To me, a realistic redemption like that can add lots of character depth, and yeah you better believe Gru has that.
Yeah Robbie Cotton is more so a nuisance than anything else as an arch enemy, while Bowser is well, Bowser, while Alexander Pierce has an entire organization, advanced technology, and very high intelligence.
Mr. Krabs (like seriously there is so many hateable and good things about him that I honestly don't know how to feel about him anymore).
Mewtwo
Is that the Krusty Krab?
Honestly, that page needs to be renamed to the player, they are canonically in the Undertale/Deltarune games, but it's too ambiguous if the anomaly is actually the player or flowey.
Given how Chara is bound for endless possibilities on how people perceive them, I wanted to know what people thought of them overall on this wiki.
Does he earn my sympathy? Yes, his past is pretty horrible. But I see no way he'd actually accept the chance of redemption. If I were a hero, I'd offer redemption to characters who are morally grey or anti-villains, but not someone who's simply tragic and that's it.
Porky Minch gets way too much Draco in leather pants. How does having an abusive father excuse attempting omnicide twice, ruining Lucas's life, brainwashing people into doing crimes against their will, and a bunch of other horrible stuff he did? He absolutely deserved his fate, and sure his tragedy isn't petty or anything, but it isn't played sympathetically like ever and is completely forgotten about in Mother 3, and absolutely does not excuse his actions.
God I'd love to have Pokemon as a pet, they would be great friends and would hold absolute loyalty to me, I wouldn't even have to use Arbok/Koffing for evil unlike the others since unlike them, a Pokemon's general morality depends on the trainer. So in other words, if they became mine, then they wouldn't be doing bad things like Jessie and James make them do.
33 Votes in Poll
Yoshi's realistic cousin