On Ratcatcher 2's page her category list says Affably Evil twice, I think someone should fix that, just wanted everyone to know.
What's on your mind?
Not only is it too subjective to say if a villain is "punished more than they deserve" and thus has a tendency to provoke edit-war, but the concept could just be a variation of the "tragic" category. Unlike most categories, which describes the villain's traits, Scapegoat is opinion-based and don't tell much about the villains persona. If an editor is compassionate enough, practically any villain who suffered a horrific death can fall under this category (as in Unintentionally Sympathetic). Thougts?
I was looking at the page for J.D. from Heathers and saw that he was only listed as Presumed Deceased, despite the fact he was shown blowing himself up at the end of the movie. Apparently, this was because someone put that J.D.'s actor, Christian Slater, said that he didn't actually die at the end of the movie. I searched around, but I didn't find anything that said this. Does anyone have a source? If not then the page should probably be updated.
48 Votes in Poll
Hello, we have eddsworld, so can we add ben and kate from crash zoom to this wiki
28 Votes in Poll
50 Votes in Poll
As I was getting to work on an Article for the character Loopty Goopty from the latest episode of Helluva Boss, I found out that somebody already made an article for the character... by having him share it with Lyle Lipton. That's why I have to ask. Is that okay, or should these two have separate articles?
The deceased category for Fidget the bat from The Great Mouse Detective needs to be corrected because he is thought to have died when Professor Ratigan threw him but in a comic he is revealed to have survived his fall and redeemed and he is shown to be smarter. The "deceased" category needs to be removed" and "redeemed" needs to be added.
Sure, she is something of an antagonist and she has helped her husband Walt to launder his drug money and lied to cover up for them. But overall she is not heinous enough to be on this wiki. Her crimes are quite small, petty and so brief in the series that I don't think she is should be on this wiki, especially when considering what kind of show she appears in where there are people much worse than her. And for the most part it was Walt's actions who gave her no choice.
But hey, it’s like saying Marie should also have her page because she was shoplifting and stole from others multiple times. Or Hank should be here because he assaulted some people and used politically incorrect statements. Badger and Skinny Pete? Are they heinous enough?
You see the problem? This is a problem I’ve noticed not just with Skyler. But doing some petty crimes (at least when compared to others in the franchise, as heinous standard can vary from work to work) shouldn’t be enough to be have an article her, because it will end up with ANY CHARACTER who has committed at least something questionable will end up on this wiki because the term "villain" (at least on this wiki) has been stretched out too much.
This Thread will be discussed of weather Roblox Games should be on the Villains/Heroes Wiki
I myself think that it should be in the wiki for a good reasons
1, Some of the Games on Roblox have their own lore and original content
2. Despite being called out for Roblox being similar to Minecraft Mods, that is not true at all in fact Roblox Games is made using Studio Mode which is a software to make games, its basically like a software tool to make make games such as Mario or Minecraft
As a result here is a clue just like how users from the VSBW did
Here’s a compromise: We evaluate each individual roblox verse to see if it’s acceptable for the site. If it isn’t, it gets nuked. If it is, we can keep it. Does this sound good to everyone?
Meaning that there should also be a new rule that Roblox Games that has its own original content and characters are allowed with COPYRIGHTED/NOT ORIGINAL content getting nuked from this wiki and the heroes wiki.
Staff Input from both wikis will be accepted here
And if anyone disagrees, feel free to explain
Can someone polish my Simon Krieger article? (add an image and put it into the Spider-Man Navigational Page?)
Would be greatly appreciated!
This would be his best image in my opinion
Hello. In order to avoid a re-creation of previously deleted pages without adm permission, how about creating a list with the name of those articles. Because It may happen that a user creates a page without knowing that it has been deleted.
I don't know if it already exists, but until then I have never seen a list with names of excluded articles. It is also interesting that the name is accompanied by the reason why the page was deleted. .
This has been something that's been on my mind for quite a while. With the rise of transgender rights, it has been brought to my attention that sex and gender are 2 separate constructs. Sex is biological and refers to chromosomes/genitalia, while gender is social/psychological and refers to how an individual presents themselves and how they want the world to see them. For this reason, the "male" and "female" categories should be based on how a character is presented, with the "genderless" category reserved for characters whose gender is ambiguous. The proposed "sexless" category would be for characters who are still identifiable as male or female but have no biological sex. Characters in the "sexless" category can be any gender and any species.
Ok so why is jane the killer on here anyway because she was the victim not jeff the killer and she is on hero wiki to so it stupid to say that she is the villain of the story when Jeff started it you saying he was the victim when it was jane open your eyes
Trisket Lipslums page https://villains.fandom.com/wiki/Trinket_Lipslums contains many misspellings, syntax and grammar errors (as well as a lot of awkward phrasing, which I didn't address) but I can't edit so here is a list of fixes if anyone cares to use it:
wrong: Trinket Lipslums was a Fuchsteufelwild (a goblin like creature, based upon the story of Rumplestiltskin) he was an IT guy,
should be: who was an IT guy
wrong: Upon doing so, he also fixed there game code
should be: Upon doing so, he also fixed their game code
wrong: he hacked the security camera's
should be: cameras, plural not possessive
wrong: He then, following his kinds traditions left clues at the murder sight, so that the game could beguine.
should be: He then, following his kind's traditions, left clues at the murder site so that the game could begin.
wrong: ...so the came wouldn't stop.
should be: so the game wouldn't stop.
wrong: Following the list of names that its kind used as anagrams. They...
should be: Following the list of names that its kind used as anagrams they...
wrong: Angered he showed his true self
should be: Angered, he showed his true self
wrong: However anticipating this the police were waiting
should be: However, anticipating this, the police were waiting
wrong: where he was faced off by Nick and Hank, realising he was facing a Grimm,
should be: where he was faced off by Nick and Hank. Realising he was facing a Grimm,
wrong: unable to except losing...
should be: unable to accept losing...
In Food Wars, Azami Nakamura is Senzaemon Nakiri's son-in-law. Therefore, simply putting "father" in his character history implies that Azami is the biological son of Senzaemon, which is not the case. I have made the necessary adjustment.