A lot of these immortals have died, so I dont they can be refered to as immortals. Kevin125 (talk) 18:10, December 28, 2014 (UTC)
I am not sure we should limit this to only characters who are complete or near complete immortals as this says as very rarely a characters either. There are many who have very limited immortality like ageless being and this includes in vampires, Death Gods, Elves, Energy Beings, and even at times deities in general. I can respect trying to limit it but at the same time there are characters like Demise and Mirage (Aladdin) who are considered immortal (natural causes) yet are taken off because they are simply eternal and I don't feel that should be the case as it would take out allot of the ones we have here. But if the majority feel I'm wrong we can keeps it this way just wanting to throw in my two cents.Jester of chaos (talk) 14:38, May 26, 2015 (UTC)
by that logic all Omnipotents must be removed since no character in fiction is actually all-powerful as even depictions of God itself have limits in storytelling (because human imagination has limits) - since omnipotent in fiction simply means "vast cosmic power" so too should immortality in fiction simply mean "extremely hard to physically kill". Inferno Pendragon (talk) 14:41, May 26, 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your input as always. I was just trying to say that I think that ageless and other versions should count as well but that is just my opinion.Jester of chaos (talk) 15:00, May 26, 2015 (UTC)
I was referring to Kevin's statement, immortals in fiction should be treated as "omnipotents" are.. if the story states they are immortal they can be added.. even if they "die".. because in fiction even gods can die.. that's also a big theme in theology, immortal gods died in mythology.. yet were still considered "immortal" .. immortals can die from violence.. Inferno Pendragon (talk) 15:06, May 26, 2015 (UTC)