Did Arkham Knight drive the plot of Batman: Arkham Knight? Because remember, central means the one who drove the plot and gets more screen-time than the main antagonist, if Scarecrow drove the plot, then Arkham Knight would be secondary
Not really dude Sabretooth is just a grunt at times and also klaw is more of a general marvel villain these days and more of a minionalso ares is more of an anti hero these days let’s add jester to the mix in this
Also Galactus is more of a bigger bad apparently but we will fix that.
So yeah klaw served as a minion in general for the marvel universe like the wizard and the masters of evil.Ares is more of the rival to hecules and hera was the main villain for most arcs. Plus Romulus was one of the founders of Weapon X . But Galactus is the one who made silver surfer so your right about him being the big bad of the silver surfer series.
Also What are your thoughts on the other two lists on DC's big bads and other comics big bads?
Come to think it I realize both sinestro and krona count since both of them are the major enimies of the green lanterns as a whole as the villains behind serval story arcs as well as sinestro being the arch-enemy of hal Jordan and krona being the arch enemy of the guardians of Oa.
besides what's the harm in telling someone "this is not a straight-up villain, he's not pure evil, he has good goals" to someone who's using this wiki to see info on a villain, they might not know how categories work, the anti-villain category might get hard to see