I want to prove myself. Do you have any thoughts on mu current edits? Any advice you can offer me to improve and show I'm a good user? Right now, I was thinking of going through the image needed category and adding appropriate images to pages. I have already done so with Cuddle E. Hugs and Chester (Emily Wants To Play). Is there anything wrong with the images? I want to help this wiki and prove myself to people. I tried looking through a couple of clean up pages, but the only real issues I saw involved sentence flow, and I'm not sure how to improve them. I want to be of use. Have I made any mistakes in any edits you are aware of?
I'm serious. Don't do anything that moronic again. And my gawd, stop acting like the victim if you get banned again. You did the same thing on TT where you were banned because of that whole issue with undoing edits. I am literally getting f*cking tired of you always having that "woe is me" attitude. And do not make pointless edits just so you can get 500+ to do proposals. That is the very definition of seeing PE as a badge of honor. Keep this up, and I will have no issue with you being banned again.
Geez! I'm not making pointless edits. So far, I consider them all legit. If you or anyone else have any problems with any of them, please contact me about them. Why do you have to be so mean? I thought we were on good terms with each other. I want to improve this wiki. The PE thing is part of it but not all of it. I have noticed some bad pages, and I want to improve them. Compare Schlump and Fleb's current status to how it was in the edit history. I want to prove myself a trustworthy user. Do you have anything regarding my edits on this wiki you would like to address, Austin? How can I prove myself?
Can I have permission to make a removal proposal for King Runeard? After all, I'm on fire with it. The so-called "genocide" was actually an attempt to force the Northuldrans to his rule; it was just exaggerated by the proposer so he'd be approved to PE. And he was. The fact that exaggerations can have a big impact on whether a villain is approved or rejected is really getting on my nerves. The worst he did was: murdering the Northuldran leader and trying to force them to submit to his rule. To me, his quote of "They will come in celebration, and then, we will know their size and strength," was only him talking about how weak the Northuldrans were compared to his kingdom of Arrendelle. If the genocide was outright stated or explicit, he would've qualified.
While we're at it, I made an edit a while ago removing anything that has to do with Runeard's "genocide" and "starvation", because those are just exaggerations, but it was reverted by Ordeaux, the one who proposed for him to be PE in the first place. The only reason I stopped was to prevent an edit war. So, may I have permission to remove it from the article again? I don't want other users to be misled into thinking he did cause a genocide and continue voting "keep" so my removal proposal would be rejected. All Runeard is is xenophobic, not genocidal.
HNY! Hope we make lots of improvements on this wiki this year. I will proudly help out as much as possible. One day, I will be able to make PE proposals of my own. It won't be long either before I'm able to vote in PE discussions. Maybe if I can get some characters approved here, someone else will nominate them on TV Tropes. I am bound and determined to become a valuable asset here.
BTW, if I ever start to get annoying or bothering, please tell me and I will back off. I want to still have someone to talk to. If I bother you, just tell me instead of blocking me. I will talk to you somewhat less than. Also, I'm sorry, but can you please tell me if you can consider occasionally posting the remaining characters I got approved on TV Tropes to my sandbox over-time? Lots of other people still post to Ambar's sandbox. I would like to know if you could consider it. Again, Happy new year.
I'm Bobg from TV Tropes. I was very unfairly banned a while ago despite 6 years of service. I have been trying to get enough edits to be able to participate in Pure Evil discussions here, since that's this site's equivalent of the Complete Monster trope. I'm hoping to do a re-proposal of Sonic.EXE to try and get him re-approved since I was the one who got him approved on TV Tropes. I am currently waiting for 6 months to pass so I can appeal my permaban and claim I changed over the months, while also looking for a new access point so I can start all over from scratch on TV Tropes with a clean slate in case that doesn't work. Fortunately for me, Falcontallons saw my list of characters on here that I got approved for the CM trope while I was still on that site but were never added to my troper CM sandbox, and they finished it so my record could be fully preserved. If you see them on TV Tropes, tell them I said thanks. As for right now, I am glad to be talking with you because I know you from TV Tropes and consider you a friend. Maybe if I get some PE examples approved on here, you can propose them on TV Tropes on your own terms if you so choose? Anyway, I just wanted to talk with you because I want to speak with a fellow villains wiki user who I know from TV Tropes.
You were banned because you readded deleted entries to the Channel Awesome heartwarming page regarding JewWario. To be honest, I don't care if Justin did help people because that does not change the fact that he was still accused of committing horrible acts. That'd be like if I said that Jimmy Savile helped me with my confidence whilst completely glossing over that he was guilty of hundreds of sex crimes against children. Sure, he gave money to charity, but all of that was a smokescreen to hide who he truly was. The fact that you did that and then tried to cry "foul" and not understanding how fucked up that was for you to basically defend a man accused of sex crimes is disgusting.
Yes, well, I offered to stay away from anything to do with him and always go to Ask The Tropers before reading anything anywhere ever again. I apologized and stated that I was not defending him but rather trying to preserve the opinions of those who knew him beforehand, admitting that I should have discussed it first. I expected to be given a stern lecture and such, but to ultimately be let back on since I had done so much over the years, but instead they permabanned me without any attempt to negotiate with me. They didn't even allow me to keep my posting ability even though it was an edit rather than a post that was the problem. I am still shocked they would permaban a six year user who had done as much as I did without any negotiations even after I apologized and promised to stay away from him and always ask others first. The edit suspension thing even says "This is not a punishment, it means come talk to us." Yet they permabanned me without any debate.
Anyway, I apologize if I offended you. I still want to be your friend, and I am hoping that I can redeem myself for that by contributing to this site and the PE discussions. I want to prove I'm a capable editor. Hopefully I can prove myself. Anyway, I hope you don't dislike me. I want to be able to talk to someone I know. Also, if you see Falcontallons, can you still tell them I said thanks?