FANDOM

Balthus Dire

aka Rémi

Dark Lord
  • I live in Paris
  • I was born on March 8
  • I am Male
A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • I’d like permission to re-post pages Clayman, Yuuki Kagurazaka, Diablo(That Time I Got Reincarnated As A Slime) and Geld(That Time I Got Reincarnated As a Slime). This time I’ll make sure there is no plagerism.

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Just created the page of Flazzard and Hyunckel ! What do you think? I plan to make the page of Zaboera next btw

      Loading editor
  • https://villains.fandom.com/wiki/File:Embed0006.jpg https://villains.fandom.com/wiki/File:Embed0011.jpg https://villains.fandom.com/wiki/File:Embed0014.jpg https://villains.fandom.com/wiki/File:Embed0041.jpg

    While the first one is something I ain't as sure on being definite removal fuel, the latter three are way too sexual for this wiki, to the point we should probably punish the user for this. This isn't the first time the uploader tried something sexual, as they formerly tried to make the page's writing more sexual too. Can you delete these and deliver the needed punishment?

      Loading editor
  • If it's not too much trouble, I'd appreciate another opinion on adding some information to a character's profile:

    https://villains.fandom.com/wiki/Thread:764641#2

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I'm deciding on a bit of a personal crusade to have infoboxes on every page on wiki to help unify the articles a bit, if you or other admins wish to help it'd be great - finding pages that have no infoboxes and adding them is one method.. another is reminding users to add infoboxes when they mke new pages, which I think will help.

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Balthus you could give me permission to create a proposal please

      Loading editor
    • View all 10 replies
    • Thanks friend

        Loading editor
    • Inferno Lord Red wrote:
      Friend I already know how to create a proposal

      No, your latest proposal on Bojack has proven that you clearly don't. With each of the PE proposals you have been making lately, you just copy sections from either here or from another Wiki (which is plagiarism) and paste them into each heading and call it a day. Because of this, each of your proposals end up being hodgepodges where the writing included in each heading don't at all relate to "mitigating factors" or "heinous standards". This is not how you make proposals. In fact, this is exactly what got booted you off the permissions list before. Your proposals just aren't coherent.

      Inferno, you do realize that when writing PE proposals, you actually have to put effort into them? You're expected to, in your own words, describe who "X" is, what atrocities they commit, if they have any redeeming qualities and how they compare to a work's heinous standards. You don't even get to the doorstep of any of this (let alone actually follow the tutorial) and instead resort to producing copy-pasted mishmashes.

      Begging admins to put you on the whitelist won't get you anywhere if you aren't going to improve, thus, I'm not giving you the benefit of the doubt here. The purpose of the whitelist is for the sake of user trust and quality control; for users who know how the Pure Evil category works (and thus, know what they're talking about) and how to write proposals up properly. You don't do either of these things, Inferno, so you can't be kept on the whitelist for the time being.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hey Balthus Dire. You mught wanna check out possible duplicate of the Dark Lich page & talk to the user who made it.

      Loading editor
    • View all 6 replies
    • It is always delicious to open a webside and read the results of hours of works and research basically called worthless...

      I can see your point Meganerd18, but I'm finding you quite judgemental and categorical. You should have at least left a message to me and others admins and explained your case, before pretty much vandalizing the page. Because YES, what you did was tantamount to vandalism, especially repeating it after an admin reverted it.

      The "nonsense about what Dark Lich is" is a retranscription of Dyluck's explanation in Secret and Belgar's boasts as he unveils his true form in Trials, in the original Japanese. I would hardly call it nonsense.

        Loading editor
    • I chose to write the article about the Dark Lich instead of his hosts, because I thought it easier. For yes, the Dark Lich is the same in both games. Same looks of ghastly skeletons in ornate robes and coats, same powers, same goals of world domination, same destruction of the Mana Tree and two very similar hosts.

      His vessels are differents, yes. Though they are clearly expies or continuities nods, being both maksed evil sorcerers who manipulate a faction and brainwash someone close to the protagonist. The Masked Mage might be a distinct being, but the being known as Thanatos is clearly revealed as nothing but a husk. What I used to describe him was cut dialogue from the Japanese since included in the recent remasters and retranslations.

      While I admit that there is no definite relation between both mage and that considering Secret as a sequel to Trials is somehow flimsy, the games are each part of separate continuities. But if the continuities are distinct, the Dark Lich is the same in both. 

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Quotes segments are for MEANINGFUL INSIGHT ON THE CHARACTER, not for all the actor's lines in the script. Right?

    I wish Sergio208 would truly understand that.

      Loading editor
    • So you know the users who spam quotes and pictures? Good, I don't. We need to tell them personnally that spamming as such is counter-productive and that if they persist they face a ban.

      I don't think we have a specific rule against this type of spam, but this counts as the rule for excessive spamming or even vandalism.

      I believe the subject must be spoken with the other admins

        Loading editor
    • Not personally but a little, yeah.

      Except Sergio208 is banned across the whole wiki community by FANDOM because of the sirt found on him @ certain wiki sites. Such a waste. If only he feel the same way as us, if he truly hone his editing skills, the good he could've done.

      I must be on my way.

      Thank you for your time.

        Loading editor
    • Personnally, I cannot stand the ones who overbloat pictures of the exact same things, countless quotes, and needlessly complicated things in the infobox. Things are meant to be simple and easily readable and yet they don't get it

        Loading editor
    • I get that too. That's what ticks me off like every day.

      It's like I used to always say when it comes to something specific such as this, "what more could a mere person want?'.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hi Balthus Dire,

    As you may know, there was recently a edit war over the antagonistic scale of René Belloq, Major Arnold Ernst Toht and Herman Dietrich, the primary antagonists of Raiders of the Lost Ark. As of now, Belloq is listed as the main, Toht as the secondary and Dietrich as a major one. Due these changed edits, those three pages are currently locked. Back when we still used the tertiary, quaternary and quinary thing, Dietrich was listed as tertiary, but we no longer use these numerations.

    However, after some investigation on the Indiana Jones Wiki, it's stated that Dietrich and Toht were Belloq's superiors actually. Thus, maybe it's possible that Belloq is the central antagonist, Toht the secondary and Dietrich the main. This is because the film's novel specifies that Dietrich hired Belloq under the orders of one member of Adolf Hitler's inner circle. Thus, Dietrich was behind the whole operation on Egypt. While Toht works alongside Dietrich, he does so just to follow orders and doesn't believe in the supernatural, so this makes unlikely for them to share the role of main antagonist. And Belloq drives more the plot by meeting Indy at the film's beginning (introducing their rivalry to the audience) while also joining the Nazis in their search for the Ark.

    If something of this serves, Dietrich was originally intended to outlive Belloq and Toht at the end of the film, surviving the Ark's opening and later chasing Indy and Marion through the island's mines before this was cut in rewrites. This is most likely the reason for which he seems to have a little presence in the film. However, Dietrich appears more than Toht, so it's evident that Dietrich's importance in comparison to Toht is significant.

    Maybe this is a similar case to that of The Phantom Menace where Darth Maul is central, Emperor Palpatine is main and Nute Gunray is secondary?

    Greetings, X9

      Loading editor
    • Truth to be told, I don't know enough about the Indiana Jones movies to tell you.

      But in this wiki we don't say secondary, tertiary or whatnot. We tried once and it led to countless complications. We said "main/primary" for the Big Bad, "central" if the most plot relevant villain works for someone as with Maxim Horvath, Golbez, or Ghirahim, "final" or variants for this someone. Anything else ranks with "major villain", "minor villain" or "one-shot villain.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • The infobox proposal is now set. It's time to spread the word. Pass it on.

    Godspeed. :-)

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
See archived talk page
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.