Valkerone who is one of this wiki's very valuable assets & allies tried to tell you to cease with the category-spamming thing more than once before one of the wiki admins, myself, had to tell you this & that's it.
You've already been blocked for abusing categories before, and now you're back doing the exact same thing again. If you're not going to bother giving your reasoning behind the huge amount of categories you add, it's just going to get brushed off as spam.
Hey, how do I put two main images of a page, as if it was a gallery? I was trying to make Dante (FMA 2003) page show her main image, with her in her original form, and her in Lyra's form? And I don't know how. So can you please tell me how, and then do the change in her page? Thanks!
Please do not interact with nor aid a sockpuppeting troll such as Super Why fan 105 (sockpuppet account of Zach618, aka Super Why fan 102) for he is banned from other wikis for harassment, spamming, trolling & unapologetically making confusing bad redirects.
It's just that I didn't know that he was a bastard troll. He only asked me to put in a video from YouTube on a Rumplestiltskin page from Super Why! I didn't know how, and he said go to YouTube and upload it there. I told him no, and he threatened to do it or he will kill me.
& it still proves that sockpuppetry (like identity theft) is still a sign of weakness, irresponsibility, avarice & even cowardice. So many poor misguided fools like that boy have not learned that lesson & they understand nothing. They always end up in trouble.
From I read & understand, a sockpuppet is a phony name or false identity created by an online user to argue, bully or review products as another person. Sockpuppets have a long and storied history; they were once well-known for responding to their own Usenet or blog posts. Nowadays, they also post on social media sites and even review their own work on Amazon.com.
The word "sockpuppet" stems from its literal meaning, which refers to a puppet created by placing a sock over one's hand. The origins of the term imply that the disguise is generally crude and unsophisticated.
In the U.K., the term sockpuppet recently garnered a lot of press when acclaimed criminal writer R.J. Ellory admitted to giving his own work glowing reviews on Amazon.com, while slamming books by other authors. The practice is believed to be widespread among authors because Amazon and similar sites lack the resources to police user identities.
A key benefit of the Internet is the ability to remain anonymous, but while sockpuppetry has ethical implications, a few sockpuppets also have faced legal trouble for harassment, criminal impersonation and computer fraud. These cases raise significant legal challenges because while sockpuppets have no constitutional rights, their puppeteers do have the right to freedom of speech.
Hey, I just want the answer to an unanswered question that I had for a while: which and who exactly is the most evil villains in Cartoon Network as a whole, in general? And I do not want opinions or beliefs or something like that. I just want to know which are the villains in Cartoon Network and its shows are Pure Evil. Tell me soon! Thanks and have a good day, everyone!
Well from Cartoon Network there is: Katz from Courage the Cowardly Dog, The Lich from Adventure Time, Vilgax from Ben 10, Dick Hardley from The Powerpuff Girls, Scarlett from Total Drama ( TV Tropes doesn't think she counts and even some admins on here don't but I think she should have counted considering the scale of her crime despite her screentime)
Speaking of pure evil, can you add Hulk (Old Man Logan) into the list of purely evil villains, because it seemed like he somehow has not been added to the page of pure evil villains? Why, I don't really know. Me, I can't do it, because I'm blocked from here for some reason. Thanks!
Even his personality says the proof: he led his own "family" to terrorize or torment anyone who lives in his city, raped dozens of women I'm sure, including his own cousin, and had his gang kill Logan's family, because they got bored, and just so Hulk could put up a fight with Logan again. What more proof do you need that he qualifies as a Pure Evil, huh?
Hey, can someone please change the Tirek picture to him with a white background, to him with the transparent background instead? I noticed you did this to Dag, and that you have such picture, so would someone do this soon? Thanks!
No problem buddy. Say, how exactly is it that this Unalaq guy counts as a villain, anyhow? I mean, I can see why with Ozai, but the issue is, many villains in Korra have passed the MEH just enough, regardless of their extremist ideas, but Unalaq yet counts as a Pure Evil. Why exactly is that?
Personally I never found Unalaq a great example of Pure Evil but unlike others he lack redeeming features, plans to plunge the world into a millennium of chaos and darkness plus is abusive towards his kids. I've always found him debatable but he's worse than the others overall. The others at least had some noble intentions trying to help the setting in some way while Unalaq sought only ultimate power to rule the world as a godlike entity.
Well, if that's the case, then what about Zaheer or Amon? They may show some redeeming features, but they're the aggressors as well. I mean, they sure as hell aren't exactly like Plankton or Mojo Jojo or Drakken or Sideshow Bob here.
Pure Evil have no redeeming features, Amon truly wants to better the world by making everyone equal so Benders can't oppress others or abuse their powers which is somewhat implied Benders do abuse their powers, Zaheer wanted to free the world of oppression and truly valued his friends with clearly being upset when his lover was killed.
Okay then. That being said, there is always someone who is the most evil of their respective franchises, and there always is a or a, even potential ones at that. We got ones in Disney, Sonic, Marvel, Dragon Ball Z, Nickelodeon, and so on and so forth. But the point is, there are some franchises that don't have a Pure Evil at the ready, specifically well-known shows like SpongeBob, the Simpsons, South Park, and Family Guy. So I gotta know, who is the most evil villain (not based on opinion) in at least those four shows overall?
With SpongeBob I'd probably say most despicable would be Mr. Krabs though he's not played that seriously despite once trying to drive someone to suicide, with The Simpsons not too familiar with it, South Park I'd probably say Eric Cartman and Family Guy arguably Peter since he does some of the most repulsive crap on the show.
It actually is a comedic media that is fairly well known to the point they got Netflix to let it run. Personally I like it mostly for the later seasons where it developed a better plot and some character development. As for the shows you mentioned none of them have one yet nor have any I've seen from a normal television network created one yet in a comedic work.
So for now it remains open ended about who will turn out to be a Pure Evil, then? Because, need I remind you, that even the most innocent of shows are not immune to these guys. I mean we got Dick Hardly from the Powerpuff Girls. The Powerpuff Girls, for crying out loud. They say it is an innocuous TV show meant for little kids that has its own share of wacky villains, lovable residents, and adorable superheroes. You would think that all villains would be like that, all down to the formula, right? Well, boy, did we get that wrong.
How the hell is Governor John Ratcliffe counts as an Insecure? The guy is obsessed with gold and money, and seems willing to kill a tribe because they're animals. And even then, he's just a coward at heart, not insecure, so how does this make any sense?
Ooh. And while we're at it, why is also Hopper or Syndrome not counting as Pure Evils? They seemed ruthless enough too. Syndrome is heartless enough to actually kill children because of a hatred for Mr. Incredible and not show a pang of guilt or remorse, and Hopper is deluded enough to force all ants into serving as his slaves because of what again? The food chain? I mean, you did say Mandible is Pure Evil, and I'd say he is just like Hopper in his own way, even though he came from DreamWorks.
Hopper has a extremely small but redeeming trait of apparently caring for his mother as he keeps his promise to her. Syndrome I honestly kind of feel counts or minimum borderline in being one but see the arguments that maybe didn't do enough for a super villain since one tried to destroy a city in the film but some have argued its due to his excuse not being called out in the film. The only argument against I feel could count would be due to not doing a little more.
Why is Noo Noo not counted as Pure Evil? He seemed like a delusional fanatic and a complete monster, and he didn't seem to show remorse for his doing in infecting the Teletubbies. Yet he is not labeled as Pure Evil, for some reason. Why's that??
Yes horror has some but they are beyond just the generic stand in though personally I feel Chucky is played for laughs too much to count and Michael Myers actually started the trend for most slashers making him unique for the time. Noo Noo comes across as too standard in my opinion to count as he does what pretty much what anyone would expect of a mad scientist in that setting.
Honestly I don't know off the top of my head but just because TV Tropes or another site accepts them doesn't mean this wiki will. It requires at minimum a good justification on how they meet all the requirements.