Considering Johnny helps his dad commit actual crimes such as stealing and robbery should we cut Mike? While Johnny is far nicer, he still technically commits worse acts. Mike simply cheated in gambling and it's never stated if gambling was illegal in their universe. Also cheating is not illegal etheir just not a nice thing to do. I would rather have Mike cut than add Johnny.
When we're about Captain Hook and Mr. Smee, i don't know why Mr. Smee is considered as evil, he's just Captain Hook's right-hand man who didn't do anything remotely evil. Tell me, can characters who are just minions to villain, but didn't do anything evil count?
What about Tinker Bell? Can she count as villainess because she tried to kill Wendy out of jealousy? If you don't remember enough, she told Lost Boys to attack Tinker Bell and made that they threw things at her and almost killed her, but Peter arrived and saved Wendy. Later, Tinker Bell had a plan with Hook and Smee about killing Wendy, yes, she redeemed herself and helpt Peter and others later, but I think she still can count. What do you say?
Hi Jester ! I saw on your favorite villains Frollo is on the top 10. According to you, did Frollo knew what he did was evil at the bottom or he's so blinded by his delusions that he genuinely believed he was a good person? Me, I think that he knew what he did was wrong because of his sadism notably but you, what do you think?
Howdy, he's in my top 10 Disney but not sure overall of all villains. I think he knew he was sinning but also delusional to a major degree as he continually tried to reassure himself he wasn't evil like after killing Quasimodo's mom and called out but more notably Hellfire. That said it doesn't even remotely excuse his actions or downplay them but if anything makes him worse.
Speaking of Frollo, do you think he is a coward? Because in the category coward, he is listed as an example but I don't remember him being so cowardly (not at Scar's level). He showed fear 2 times, but it was a bit understandable according to me
Should the category of Propagandists be qualified as the sub-category of Hypocrites and Incriminators because from what i understand, Propagandists used themselves to look innocent and better than anyone else, and their own works to frame and villainize someone?
Beastars in a world of modern, civilized, Anthropomorphismanimals with a cultural divide between theCarnivore and Herbivore. The series takes its name from the in-universe rank of Beastar, an individual of great talent, service and notoriety. They evening got amine three-four months go I watch in dub g it amazing show they going make season 2 next year if are amine fan go watch (if you sub or dub) and learn.
In my opinion, it is the Indominus Rex because the Indoraptor sure was a sadist but only because he liked the prey being scared by him. He devoured them right away after. The Indominus Rex on the other hand, fatally hurted dinosaurs and left her die slowly.
The user TheVisitor109 is another sockpuppet of Rene Correa/Frogcraft/Conejoz1, so if that article they just created for John Wick seems like it's plagiarized, it probably is, considering how many times they've done so in the past (not to mention that even as someone who's only superficially familiar with the movies, I have serious doubts he qualifies as a villain going by what I know). I already tried to let Valkerone know about this, but for some reason, he hasn't blocked them yet, and it's hard to know if he's even seen my message since for some reason, he doesn't respond to a lot of messages sent his way.
Thanks. While I'm on the topic though, I'd like to ask you a question; do you have any idea why Valkerone never responds to many of the messages users send him? Don't get me wrong, I think he's a very professional and responsible administrator, and there are some cases where it's understandable, like when it's a sockpuppet (mostly you-know-who) or someone else asking something they should, by all means, know the answer to already. However, there are other cases where users have asked perfectly reasonable and understandable question for the sake of clarification, and he still never responds. To be honest, this has been bugging me a little for a while now. At some point or another, has he happened to mention something to the effect of feeling like he's too busy to respond to every inquiry? If you don't know, that's fine, and I'm not trying to sound critical since I'm fully aware that even administrators and moderators can't always be available to answer messages, but I worry that it's the kind of thing that can lead to people taking it the wrong way, specifically, that they'll think he considers their question so dumb or inane that they're not worth acknowledging.