FANDOM

Koovy

aka Thomas

  • I live in Somewhere in France.
  • I was born on February 14
  • My occupation is Student
  • I am Male
A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • 1. Read my response to your comment on my proposal for the killer from Blood Trail.

    2. While this happened a while ago, I need you to explain this. Why on earth did you add Alex, out of everyone, to “on & off”? That’s really pushing it. Alex is an abusive, sadistic, and remorseless rapist and murderer. “On & Off” implies redeeming qualities, which has nothing to do with Alex. Just because he was brainwashed against violence doesn’t mean he “sometimes switches to the good side and sometimes to the bad side”, since it wasn’t HIS CHOICE to refrain from villainy. He was in a hypnotized state. During his normal state, he commits crimes as long as he has the chance. So please don’t add the category again. That’s borderline abuse.

      Loading editor
    • 1. I answered.

      2. I don't recall to put him under On & Off, but I'm sorry if this happened. Yes, he didn't deserve to go under On & Off, that's a fact. Though saying that's borderline abuse is quite... exaggerated, you don't find? I was perhaps tired and didn't think twice before adding the category.

        Loading editor
    • “Borderline” is the key word. I meant that it comes dangerously close to abuse since Alex himself is absolutely irredeemable. But if you just added it out of absentmindedness, I can get why. Just be more careful.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Don't misconstrue the whole thing, because it's not a case of "Genocidal villains aren't xenophobic" at all.

    It's been a long established rule that both the genocidal and xenophobe categories don't belong on the same pages together because genocidal villains are much more extreme than your typical xenophobes, thus making the inclusion of the xenophobe category on the page of a genocidal villain redundant. The same thing applies to "Murderer" and "Serial Killers" categories.

      Loading editor
    • Hello Valkerone (sorry for the "late" response),

      I admit I was quick to act to what I believe is false. I still believe that Genocidal villains and Xenophobes can go on pair, because Genocidals villains can be motivated by Xenophobia. But rest assured that I won't cause an edit war for such an insignificant issue.

      Regards,

      K0Ovy (talk) 18:22, July 2, 2019 (UTC)

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • D-Stroy has finally been added in the Pure Evil Discussion list, just to let you know:

    https://villains.wikia.com/d/p/3179493162221867095

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Wait, the evil Android 21 is sympathetic?

      Loading editor
    • "Android 21 is an extremely unpredictable character, one moment, she can be caring and sympathetic [...]"

      (Just taken from the article. I'm not a Dragon Ball fan you know, but after what I've read she's a balance between Affably and Faux Affably. So you can either put her under Affably or Faux Affably.)

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • OK, so I read the (I think two) volumes of the manga. Personal distaste for it aside, what makes Oushima stand out? Given the setting of the manga where anyone is able to make a profit from committing horrific murders, the setting feels too dark to have a legitimate example.

      Loading editor
    • She only stands out within the story due to being the main antagonist, as well as a ruthless murderer with absoluteny no redeeming qualities, a traitor, rapist, torturer, and so on.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hello.

      Loading editor
  • Please do not ever abuse the Candidate for Deletion category like you did on the Plagiarism category. It's unacceptable.

      Loading editor
    • Hello

      But I thought that pages labeled as "Plagiarism" were deleted?

        Loading editor
    • They were, although there are some that have given another chance to restored or written so they can stay.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I was contemplating  watching the film to see if she qualified, but what about the Freudian excuse? It doesn't hold up?

      Loading editor
    • Hello,

      Sorry for not answering quickly, I was busy doing many things so I did not notice your message (unfortunately). 

      In fact, I don't think the Freudien excuse hold up, once she killed the pregnant woman in an atrocious ways, though she has a quite rough backstory. However, I think that I should not have add her to the Pure Evil category, not for the Freudian excuse but because I now think that her Moral Agency is not very clear (as she become very delusional by what she lived). 

        Loading editor
    • Having watched the film, she seems competent enough to orchestrate the murders. If anything, while I know about her letting her father die rather than help him, and her relationship with her brother isn't much, what about her mother? She was obviously sorrorwful when she died years ago.

        Loading editor
    • Yes, so that's why I've commit a mistake when I put her as a Pure Evil. Next time I'll be more cautious xD

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • No span tags, no null tags and no nowiki tags allowed (see Rules).

      Loading editor
  • No edit-spamming allowed (see Rules).

      Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.