FANDOM

A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • Hey Michel how are you? I see you create a lot of new pages. You miss some parts so please look into this when you make pages:

    1. Infobox - The infoboxe's we're all for cleanup. Please look how i updated them in Source viewer.

    2. Categories - Please try adding as much categories as you can. 

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • sounds like they are a family.

      Loading editor
    • View all 11 replies
    • all right. I will say no more. You clearly know more about RDR series than I do.

        Loading editor
    • I don't really, it's on the RDR wiki - either way, these two articles are missing critical info and that's why you don't know about their roles in the main story.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • You need to tone it down with some of the categories you are adding to certain pages. When was it ever established that Cannibals are automatically "Monsters"? Many cannibalistic villains are more often than not regular human beings specifically for more realistic works, so to claim that every cannibal is a monster is a bold claim. You're painting the category with an extremely broad brush by adding Monsters as a subcategory to Cannibals.

    Additionally, we have a rule in place against adding the Monsters category to Demons and Cosmic Entities. Villains under that category are already a big step up from your usual monster since they are much more intangible beings in nature. Adding the monsters category to pages with those categories already there is redundant.

    And last but not least: Gollum? An alien? No. He is not a being from another planet in-universe and started out as an ordinary Hobbit. So I'm just going to assume that's borderline category abuse.

    Bottom line, don't abuse categories and make wild claims to get your reasoning across.

      Loading editor
    • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropophage



      cannibals in folklore are seen as monsters, deal with it.



      gollum's appearance is based on the aliens known as Grey and demons are monsters, removing them from monsters is just illogical.

        Loading editor
    • then why did you add demon and satanism to the Aliens from "Fire in the Sky"?  because of the theory that aliens are demons? when does it end?

        Loading editor
    • And not every single work including a cannibal is folklore? Again, painting the category with a very broad brush.

      Oh and, Gollum just so happening to look like an alien means nothing. He's not an actual alien in the Middle-earth universe, through and through. Your reasoning behind Gollum being an alien is just plain ludicrous.

        Loading editor
    • also Anthropophage is a specific type of folkloric monster, doesn't mean all cannibals are Anthropophage.

      oh and Gollum looks NOTHING like a Grey, if anything he's more like a goblin.. which is because he's a mutated Hobbit.. a magical creature.. absolutely no relation to UFOs etc.. this is like saying dragons are aliens because they "look like reptoids".

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
See archived talk page
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.