FANDOM

A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • Can you restore Allosaurus (Lost World) where I can move its information to anonther wiki page website

      Loading editor
    • I am sorry, but I didn't keep this page's writings nor the pictures, and I don't know if there is a way to restore it now that it has been deleted for so long.
      What is the wiki you were talking about ? Maybe I can still give some help.

        Loading editor
    • It's called antongist wiki if you ever heard of that wiki page website

        Loading editor
    • You still here

        Loading editor
    • I'm sorry for not answering sooner, but I don't think I can help you. I didn't manage to find the infos and images I used last time for the page.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Dallas Howard was quite a villain. He was a protagonist, but after similar examples of TV-Tropes, he fulfilled several requirements for "Protagonist-Centered Morality" and "Designated Hero". As the hero of the movie, one can not call him anyway.

      Loading editor
    • Because in the context of the movie, he's supposed to be a hero, not a villain. He may had a criminal past, but during the events of the movie I don't remember him doing anything really villainous.

        Loading editor
    • I also did not refer to his past. He isn´t a nice guy, and his "qualities" as leader are responsible for several deaths. I thought this would be enough to be a villain. But okay.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hey there, could you help me clear out the Deceased Villains category?

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Categories are undergoing a massive revision and clean up. Powers and Weapons & Tools and related cats are being targeted for deletion. Vader *is* one of the definitive stranglers, but that has little to do with his villainy.

    As for some of the other cats I removed from his page… "Child Abuser" is eclipsed by "Child Murder", don't need both because if you're murdering children, you're abusing them. When one cat is worse and or more informative than another, drop anything similar.

    "Planet Destroyer", actually, General Tarkin did. He did not. No more so than the janitor on the x-teenth floor of the Death Star did.

      Loading editor
    • View all 7 replies
    • Strangulation often is done via a weapon, we're just not going to make the distinction of "manual strangling". In the case of the Force empowered, the weapon *is* the Force.

      When I lock pages, they are for 1 to 2 weeks as a means to dissuade edit warring.

        Loading editor
    • She's an admin now and has been a ver well respected user and she can do whatever the heck she deems appropriate.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Sorry to bother you, but could you please voice your thoughts on Peggy's talk page? I agree that she should stay in this wiki because she betrayed Stanley to the mobsters for money.

      Loading editor
    • I would like like to, but I have to settle things with Love Robin, and I don't think she will react about a message on the talk page.

        Loading editor
    • Why not? Discuss on the Talk Page *is* what the instructions on the Deletion Banner says needs to be done.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Understand that there are several categories which are not only redundant, but offer less (or more) information than a similar Cat.

    For example with Dennis Nedry… there is already Category:Action Movie Villains, so Category:Movie Villains is not only redundant due to the fact that "movie" is right there in "Action Movie", but is less informative. BOTH are NOT NEEDED, and use the Category which offers the most information.

    Same for Category:Deceased Villains. There is already Category:Died in Disgrace, which not only already tells us he is deceased, but tells us more about his death. BOTH are NOT NEEDED, and use the Category which offers the most information.

    Category:Spy is already covered by Category:Double Agent. Though perhaps Spy should stay and Double Agent be dropped since because no one at the island knew he was a spy he was not "double".

    I take exception to some of the others. While Category:Crackers certainly applies, he was not so much an "Evil Genius" or "Master Manipulator". Certainly he was not "Successful" since he died without completing his agenda. I doubt simple employees count as "Officials", Corrupt or otherwise.

    I also do not recall him being a "Pervert" or "Failure-Intolerant".

      Loading editor
    • View all 5 replies
    • The Category:Double Agent isn't about spies, only about villains who pretend to be on one side while they are on the other. You should check the category definition.

        Loading editor
    • Even that definition doesn't really define Nedry's opportunistic theft.

      Additionally, Categories are supposed to *define* a character. A single instance of an image on a computer screen is not necessarily enough to define him a pervert.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Because I know of your tendency to argue with people, I'm gonna let you off with a warning, learn to accept disagreements and quit adding Queen Bavmorda's page to CM or I'll lock the page. It's getting very old fast and coming off as very whiny.  I am utterly sick of you behavior in regards to disagreements. Not because you disagree, you're free to do so, but because you won't accept the fact that the majority don't agree with you and cause uneccessary editing wars because of it. We are not just gonna give into peer pressure like you think. Learn to accept change the first time cause it would be allot less annoying for all of us. Thank you.

      Loading editor
    • Please don't get angry, I don't want to cause an edit war. If I added Bavmorda in the Complete Monster category, it was not only because I personally consider her as one (although I admit that I do), it was mainly because she is considered as one in TV Tropes, and they have higher standards than Villains Wiki. And I'm not the only user who added her in the category, I only did it twice (the last time it was not me). I had the impression that an user wrongly removed her from the category despite every one else considers her as one, but if there has been a discussion about her and everyone agreed that she is not a CM, then I accept it, even though I hope you will change your mind someday (however, it doesn't seem to be the case since, like I said, many other users added her in the category).

        Loading editor
    • Well I just relaized you only did it twice and I apologize. But still, you do need to accept the fact that we don't always agree with TV Tropes no matter how high the standards.

        Loading editor
    • I'm really sorry for the inconvenience, I thought I was doing the right thing. I know that this wiki doesn't always agree with TV Tropes, but I thought it was the case this time and that the user who removed her from the CM category made a mistake. If everyone now agrees that she is not one, I accept it and I won't add her in the category again (though I think her case should be reconsidered).

        Loading editor
    • Well that's ok but if enough people (especially admins) disagree I recommend asking first as all.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • please 

      Loading editor
  • Congratulations. You just orphaned the entire history of the previous version of Grumpy (Land of the Lost).

    If it was to be decided to restore the page, admins would have undeleted it, also meaning with their approval. It would have taken them all of 3 keystrokes and the page restored not only as it was, but with the entire history of attributions restored.

    I tried to advise you that if it was going to be restored that undeletion is the proper and wikia.com-approved method. You might want to keep this in mind for the future.

      Loading editor
    • View all 5 replies
    • Read the Community Corner, seen to the right of Wikia Activity…

      "IMPORTANT NOTICE: DO NOT RECREATE DELETED PAGES WITHOUT ADMIN APPROVAL […] this has gone on for too long and will now result in blocks for repeat offenders, we will be considerate to those who do not know better but many have outright ignored Admins and will now learn there is a chain of command that must be followed."

      For future situations.

        Loading editor
    • I tried to ask the admin's permission, he said he didn't want to talk to me about that, but I sent him a message to inform him that I was going to recreate the page and he didn't object. I didn't ask your permission because you're not an admin. I did what I could. Anyway, I don't think I will be blocked for that.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.