FANDOM

Overseer80

aka The Gentle Mandalorian

  • I live in Coruscant Underworld
  • I was born on June 15
  • My occupation is Scholar, Writer, Editor, Bounty Hunter (just kidding about the last one)
  • I am The helmet does hide it doesn't it?
A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • Including zombified Spider-Man (although he turned good again later on), the Dark Ultimates, Ultimate Doctor Doom, Ultimate Eddie Brock (Venom), and Ultimate Green Goblin?

      Loading editor
    • Oh dear...that's quite the list.

      I'll see what I can do. Honestly I'm more inclined to start with Ultimate Carnage, as I feel he's a bit more distinct from his 616 self than the ones listed above. But I'll see what I can get done.

        Loading editor
    • Okay. I'm sorry, it's just that many articles need variations.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Of course he has corrupted a lot of people via temptation, but there were also those that he couldn't corrupt. He couldn't corrupt Job. He tempted Jesus Christ but failed. Revelations says that every knee will bow to the Godhead three in one, and the devil will be in the lake of fire for all eternity. As for the neutral part also looking from a biblical standpoint (whether you have a head knowledge of the Bible), corrupting a certain number of people does not make him "successful", as he had his failures as well.

      Loading editor
    • View all 11 replies
    • Ah. Thank you. Sorry for thinking you were attacking me. I thought it was Blueberry. Apologies. No hard feelings I hope?

        Loading editor
    • no matter who you were talking to, you earned yourself a ban - this is not the place to insult people like that, also he was clearly trolling you and will be dealt with as well : you however showed a very negative side to yourself with the language you chose to use and the way you voiced your opinions.

      Anyway, this is Overseer's wall so I'll leave it at that.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • You do have the best intentions for this Wiki. And you know I was lashing out at User:Blueberrysauce, not you. Ever consider being an admin?

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • This time I think you may be wrong. I agree concerning the "Hero's Lover" category, if the villain wasn't actually "in love" with the hero, however on the category "Evil VS Evil" it is clearly said that to qualify, a villain has to be portrayed in at least some sort of "heroic" way for fighting other villains. A Complete Monster is never ever portrayed in any positive way. Percy Whetmore might be an exception, but I'm not really sure about Catalina.

      Loading editor
    • Hmm...going by my understanding of it, Evil Vs. Evil can pertain to any scenario where two evil parties are in conflict. At least that's how it's viewed on TV Tropes and they're where the term comes from so I prefer to go with their definition.  To give another example Pre Vizsla and Darth Maul fit Evil Vs. Evil with each other, but Pre Vizsla is definitely a Complete Monster. So I'm not sure. For now we'll just leave it as is I guess.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • you fixed grammr on storm shadow and baroness ok

      Loading editor
  • i am austim girl with grammar prombmls

      Loading editor
  • Can't wait. Although Zombie Spider-Man did turn good, when he came to Earth-Z, he ate some more flesh, which is not a good thing. He could be considered a True Neutral character compared to the usual Neutral Good character.

      Loading editor
  • Overseer80, StarWizardWars. Both of you boys (you are a male, right? No offence, really) just knock it off & quit fightin' over this page. It is really gettin' old. Seriously. Thank you.

      Loading editor
    • Take it up with him. I've said my piece about a dozen times and he refuses to listen to me. No matter what I say he is 110% convinced that he is right and nobody else is. Honestly I find his insistence on policing Star Wars pages to be supremely exasperating, especially given how he never even tries to give an argument in his favor.  If he thinks he's right, that's just grand, but the onus is on him to prove that he's right. He cannot just assume that I know what he's thinking. I am trying to provide corrections to a page in desperate need of them and he is so consumed with narciccism that he refuses to believe himself to be in the wrong. So perhaps you or an admin can talk some sense to our mutual "friend". I've already requested he be banned for blatantly disrespecting me repeatedly with his actions.

      But you're right. It is getting old. But he refuses to communicate with me, so my hand is forced.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I have to bring this up because Syndrome is NOT a complete monster! He is a sympathetic villain! how can a sympathetic villain be a complete monter? look [here]. TV Tropes itself decided it.

    I am not trying to argue with you; just pointing this out. I will be removing him because he fails the criteria.

      Loading editor
    • View all 5 replies
    • Actually his motives were not of the Well-Intentioned Extremist variety. He outright says that once everyone becomes super, no one will be because that will be the standard. So actually it is an insidious symbolical destruction of the very concept of superhumans. Nothing well-intentioned about it. 

      And in fact he DID know there were children on board.  Elasti-Girl says in no uncertain terms there are children onboard, which shocks Mirage. Syndrome however doesn't care and goes through with the plane's destruction.

      So in the end he is not a Well-Intentioned Extremist and knowingly targeted missiles at children.

        Loading editor
    • Actually, you almost got me. The first point, you got me convinced.

      But the second one, I am still on-the-fence. Maybe Syndrome thought Elasti-Girl was lying about children being on board? But I will accept that I have been outvoted. I guess he can stay in this category.

      Thank you for being respectful UNLIKE TV Tropes users. :)

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  •   Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
See archived talk page
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.