FANDOM

Red Chevalier

aka Red Chevalier

Content Moderator Discussions Moderator
  • I live in Eagleland, aka the US
  • My occupation is Crypto-Illuminati Agent
  • I am Male
A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • You literally locked this page for no reason. Is it because of the antagonist/protagonist problem? If so, then I can discuss it with you here, as the Animator is pretty clearly the protagonist of the second part.

      Loading editor
    • View all 11 replies
    • My point that he literally started his rampage in less then a second. Knowing this in less then a second makes him all-knowing/omiscient.

        Loading editor
    • He already was aware of his surroundings when he was first brought to life. I;m not saying he's omniscient but it stands to reason by that line of logic he knew something about the Animator's intentions also.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Do you have any clue how hypocritical you act while you are working with this wiki? It gets on some peoples nerves JAYK.

      Loading editor
    • View all 6 replies
    • I'm refferring to the WatchMojo. I've seen you and another user disagreeing of whether we should have their rankings and ideals on this website. And if you believe their fame is a popularity, you better think again. That guy you were speaking to is right. If you watch enough clips and compare them with the previous videos, you will know that they are grabby and covet only to be the best. They push people's interest down with their chutzpah attitude and like they are so perfect, even trying to embrace a specific object in other of their clips just to embrace that specific object like it's a precious relic from a golden era. When it's a specific catagory of the video clip they add unrelated, well sometimes it's related but they narrate it in the wrong way. They focus on to make sure people gain 100 percent enthusiasm and agree with their ideals and opinions and those who disagree are complete fools. That fame is called notoriety. You shouldn't be listening to the exact everything a certain channel or website says. There are plenty of other better channels that are more magnanimous and have a unique opnion. Listen to them instead of some highly political savage fools. Or most likely try to be aware that Social Media is what is causing people's dreary depression these dark times.

        Loading editor
    • No one is saying that Watchmojo is the arbiter of what's best. But, they are a large media website and thus trivia about them is notable enough to include.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I'm sorry but what about my vote was invalid? I thought we had to give our opinion and whatnot? I didn't know we had to write a paper explaining our reasons against it. I'm new to this so you mind please explaining to me why my against the vote was invalid?

      Loading editor
    • Your vote didn't have anything to do with the quality of the villain. Saying you don't like him because he's "small time" or because he's too much of an anti-villain is the same as downvoting a candidate because they murdered someone or because they're Pure Evil. It has nothing to do with how well written you thought the villain was or anything like that.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I saw that we made a clean-up of that category. Now my question is, at what point a villain clearly counts as a Psychopath?

      Loading editor
  • Wanted to let you know I made a poll with the evilest villains ever. You can check it out if you want to. If not that's fine.

    https://villains.fandom.com/f/p/4400000000000001511

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Pardon, I have been informed by a user you told them that DLC/official supplementary materials content to the main story could not be considered cannon of a character. I am just checking as to if this is a policy you enforce.

      Loading editor
  • I dont know if you heard about it but do you think bow chan is fanfiction

      Loading editor
  • For the past few weeks or so now, you and Ordeaux haved harbored a silly rebellion complex towards the subpage layouts on the Wiki. In Ordeaux's case, it's been the headings/subheadings. And in your case, it's been against the introductions. I have already told Ordeaux to knock it off, so please do me a favor and do the same. The subpages have had these introductions for a while now and there is no point in removing/reducing them, since they don't actually make the pages look worse. "If it ain't broke, don't fix it".

    And before you say "they're unnecessary", the existence of them does not justify going on a massive editing rampage to revert something so minor (in fact, it's a waste of time). Save the mass cleanups for stuff that is actually much more worthwhile i.e. renaming categories or reverting category abuse. Point is, leave the subpages as they are and move on.

      Loading editor
    • Valkerone may I ask you a question?

      Why does the Villain Overview page not have a line that says "An overview of X from the X franchise."

        Loading editor
    • Nevermind, I'm not interested in dragging this debate out onto the wiki. I'd rather we focus on more important matters.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Does this count characters who were killed off, but returned suddenly? For example, Rob Hawthorne from Hollyoaks supposedly died after falling off a boat in the middle of the ocean in October 1998, but returned in an episode in September 1999. He was not revived or anything, just that the show lead viewers to believe that he had died (in fact, the producers did kill off the character until they decided to bring him back).

      Loading editor
  • Can I create a category for Shonen Jump Villains?

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.