Hi there. I originally sent a message like this to Magma Mk-II since I thought he'd be the best administrator to ask about this topic, but then I remembered you were the one who did the blog post on the new PE-related rules that mentioned users had to make at least 300 edits and be here a month to even vote on proposals.
Anyway, with that being established, I felt I had to let you know that I have indeed seen some newer accounts that have clearly been made just, or at leats primarily, to vote on proposals. A good example of this is a user named Will Colling; most of his very small number of edits, which are not even close to the 300 edit requirement you outlined, are proposal votes. So I have to ask: even if these aren't sockpuppet accounts, but rather, just newer users who seem to only have created an account for that purpose and haven't done anything wrong before that, do they get a block of any kind, or can they be let off with a simple warning, at least at first? I just want to make sure, because this is just one particularly good example I've seen of this lately, and I don't want to come off like I'm trying to get anyone who genuinely doesn't know better in trouble, but your post did discourage this exact practice, so I thought it was important, as well as the responsible thing to do, to bring this to your attention. Plus, I'm simply curious what the process is for dealing with those who ignore, or at the very least, have overlooked that new rule.
Anyway, I hope bringing this to your attention does some good. It may not do much actual harm, but I still don't want to keep seeing that happen if it's technically against the current regulations, After all, as it's been repeatedly enforced lately, this isn't the Pure Evil Wiki.
Okay, that makes sense. I don't even personally mind that much as long as the users in questions are putting some effort into their votes. If anything, I think it's more problematic in the cases of those who are not only not eligible, but keep giving lazy yes or no votes, which is one of the main things this requirement seems to be made for the sake of preventing.
I just want you to know that I made my first ever Pure Evil Proposal blog post on One-Eye from the 2012 computer-animated dinosaur film Speckles the Tarbosaurus (or The Dino King in the United States).
Could you tell me where it is written that the Herrscher of the Erosion looking at all people as toys and wanting to create her own empire? I just read in the comics that I read that she wanted to avenge Higokumaru
Avenge, Higokumaru? Where? You have to tell me where you found that conclusion first because Erosion was nothing but a sadistic plague who used the girl as a vessel to destroy humankind. Nothing more than that.
In divine key 12 jizo mitama stands that the virus seethed with the hatred of the girl and carried out her desire of vengeance. I interpreted that the Herrscher of the Erosion wanted to revenge Higokumaru and on Tv Tropes stands the same thing so I thought my interpretation would be correct. Maybe I've just misunderstood it.It would be nice if you could enlighten me. Text on Tv Tropes: One thing that stands out from the Herrscher of Corruption compared to the rest of the Honkai, who are solely focused on humanity's extinction, is that her seething hatred knew no bounds and moved on to inflicting as much suffering as possible as a response to carrying out her dead host's desire for vengeance.
Do you think Tweedledoom & Tweedledeath are even villians to begin with? They are merely a test summoned by a teacher to test two kinghts' skills! So can I remove them from the davbox of Dragon Quest Villians? Here of details of them
Hi there, I noticed that you had contributed a fair bit to White Queen's article on the wiki here. I have some more information avaliable regarding her powers and etc, as well as a few revisions I could put forward in regards to some aspects of her personality. I don't want to edit it without your permission though, would you like my help at all?
I'm just about to add in her powers and abilities, but I took the names of each bullet from the DAL Wiki, but have paraphrased and added in more facts about what each ability does significantly. Is this okay or does it fall under plagiarism?