Look, if you're going to start adding obsolete terms like "tertiary/quaternary/quinary antagonist" to pages like Draco Malfoy, then you really need to familiarize yourself with the rules. Antagonist fussing is highly discouraged due to overly-specifying villain roles to the point where its redundant and spammy. While tertiary is generally no longer in use and discouraged, quaternary and quinary or anything below those two terms are completely forbidden. So again, don't abuse the antagonistic scale.
OK, here's my problem with Destoroyah; one of the chief gripes that I have with this particular Kaiju is that apparently, he's a hive mind. Basically, Destoroyah is made up of several creatures that have a shared consciousness. As such, this falls under the "no groups" rule.
Alright... (also, my apologies for resending this; the original message contained a typo in the title, which I couldn't fix)
Let me get this out of the way. I appreciate what you're trying to do for this wiki and it's good that you're at least trying to be constructive. It's good that you're expanding pages with actual, detailed information.
But please, please, when an admin marks an edit as irrelevant, unconstructive, or a misuse, do not revert that edit or try to shoehorn it back into the article. If a category is removed? That means it doesn't apply to the villain. Do not re-add it and do not engage in an edit-war. The "type of villains" section should not be a re-state of the categories; it should simply be a single term/category that most generally applies to the villains. It's present on a lot of articles, but I plan to talk to Balthus Dire at some point in time to make this into a rule, because frankly, it's ridiculous at this point. And finally, the villain tags... (e.g. main, secondary, tertiary antagonist, and that ilk) not only should those not be used past "secondary" in any regard (please read this to get better detail on that) the way you've used them on the Minecraft pages is in a way that does not apply. Minecraft doesn't have a true story or narrative structure. The enemies oppose the player, but none of them serve to create conflict that drives the story forward; they are enemies and bosses and nothing more.
What particularly concerns me is that you seem to be deliberately ignoring this even when an administrator outlines it to you. I've already locked at least two pages because of your continued insistence on bloating up the article with information and spam deemed useless and ignoring/warring with the admins who try to clean that up. You mean well and you've still got a lot of constructive edits under your belt, so I'm going to let you off with as gentle of a warning as I can.
I'll restate; when something is marked as misuse, do not re-add it. Should you ignore these points, you will be blocked again; and given that I've already blocked you once and you've now received a warning, demonstrating that you still refuse to follow the rules proves that you're simply ignoring them and it will not be a lenient block.