I don't think this page should exist to be honest. She is essentially a anti-hero, she has good intentions, but is simply a very hardened and harsh individual. I would disagree that she is guilty of child abuse, she is simply very protective of Betty and Polly, and only wants what is best for them, despite being very harsh with them at times. She is now one of the series protagonists now as well. She may have also been involved in the South Serpents in her youth, but that past is now behind her. RedWizard98 (talk) 07:30, November 18, 2018 (UTC)
No. She spent most of the first half of Season One abusing Betty and Polly, and however good her intentions were, she still counted as an antagonist at that time. There's a difference between "scolding your kids" and "sending them to live with sociopaths, straight-up insulting them in their faces (doing that to your own kids could easily pass as emotional abuse), keeping them away from each other at all costs, etc." So basically, she was an anti-villain, not an anti-hero. And the fact that she was once a member of the Southside Serpents only further cements her status as a villain. And about the whole "she is now a protagonist" argument, what the heck is this? Looperreallyreallysucks (talk) 00:00, December 3, 2018 (UTC)