Cecil Clayton, not John Clayton

This should be renamed to Cecil Clayton because Clayton in this movie was based off of Cecil Clayton from the book. In the book, John Clayton was Tarzan's birthname. Bentonfill (talk) 16:47, February 2, 2013 (UTC)

There will be a 2014 adaptation of Tarzan next month, so this page should be renamed "Cecil Clayton (Disney)".Danstaw1223 (talk) 02:27, April 22, 2014 (UTC)

You should add to this page on Trivia that Clayton is the main antagonist because he has bigger plans than Sabor.Evanopedal (talk) 05:54, September 2, 2015 (UTC)Evan Kalani Opedal


I have some suggestions of categories for him : - Tarzan Villains

- Animal Killers (he killed Kerchak)

- TV Show Villains (he appeared in the TV series in flashback and hallucinations)

- Siblings (he had a sister)

- Posthumous Villains (his sister came in the jungle and tried to kill Tarzan to avenge his brother's death)

- Died in Disgrace (for obvious reasons)

Mimic45 (talk) 21:39, January 24, 2015 (UTC)

But this only serves to drive Clayton into a frenzy and he slashes at the vines,

Replace with w:c:evil: /

- Heroes turned to the Dark Side (Clayton was normal at first, but bad at the end.)

That's wrong!! Clayton is always a villain!!

Voice Actor

Shouldn't this villain have his voice actor named.


I actually like him for some reason. --Beethoven4ever (talk) 15:12, September 5, 2016 (UTC)

Complete Monster

He must be Pure Evil, he only cared about money and falsly imprisoned, Jane, Professor Porter and Trazan for the sake of poaching gorrlilas.--IDFC Bank (talk) 16:13, September 28, 2018 (UTC)User:IDFC Bank

No he had no intention to kill Tarzan, Jane and her father at first and was going to release them once they got back to land. He wasn't going to kill the gorillas just round them up and sell them except for Kerchak who he did try to kill but that was only because Kerchak nearly killed him earlier. Him killing Kerchak was self-defense and he only tries to kill one human Tarzan and attempted murder is generic villain stuff. Even after his true nature is revealed he makes no attempt to harm Jane or her father just Tarzan who is an ape-man in his eyes. He also is a scapegoat for sure getting hung is a horrible death for anybody especially since he never murdered anyone. Romeo and Robot (talk) 22:41, April 26, 2020 (UTC) 

He's not heinous enough to be PE. But whatever the case  we don't use talk pages to promote villains to the PE category. If you think he's a PE, simply create a PE proposal and we'll sort it out civilly. Ngh93 (talk) 00:54, April 27, 2020 (UTC)


Shall Clayton's true nature revealed be foreshadowed?

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.