I'm putting this out there mainly because I need to discuss it somewhere relevant, instead of just going up to some random user and talking to them about it. I will continue edits on the page once my question is answered: Does he completely qualify as a villain? Grunkle Stan is greedy, yes, but I'm not entirely sure as to whether this is going to remain on this wiki (as it has not been made before, perhaps for reason) or if it will eventually be deleted due to the fact that he actually is not a qualified villain. He is guilty of such crimes as theft and counterfeit, as I explained in the article. Please help me decide. Thanks.
Curly-BraceXD (talk) 05:49, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
There was a discussion on him an for keep in mind he was willing to risk destroying the universe to see his brother again and stole from the government. I personally say that's enough along with his constantly conning others for personally gain. Jester of chaos (talk) 22:00, June 15, 2019 (UTC)
Stanley Pines is a VANDAL[]
In Season 2, Episode 16, the story follows Stan taking Dipper, Mabel, and her friends on a roadtrip with the specific intent on vandalizing other tourist traps. If he's on this wiki for the reason of con artistry, then there's no argument that can be made that he is not conning his competitors out of business via VANDALISM. Firstly, they take the world's largest yawn ball and unravel it, then they proceed to tip over an upside house at Upside-Down-Town. After that, and this one is undeniably legally vandalism by every stretch of the law, Stan unleashes corn weevils into the corn maze. He is maliciously and purposefully causing destruction of property. I rest my case.