FANDOM


  • When me - and several other users - have judged that section as bloated and unneeded, do not unmark those edits. You've already been blocked and by this time you've proven you're willingly ignoring this and you've given no solid counter-arguments as to why the section should stay, so there's at this rate no excuse for your behavior aside from you throwing a defiant tantrum.

    Eggman has been locked in part due to your spam. Do not post those kinds of edits again or your next suspension will be much longer.

    Thank you.

      Loading editor
    • I have no tantrum problem compared to the ones who have been unreasonably erased the similar villains section of Robotnik again and again, and I have given countless solid counter-arguments myself on why the Similar Villains should stay on the page since there are other villains (as well as heroes on Heroes wiki) that have certain similar traits, characteristics, etc.  So there is really no excuse for you to use the spam of erasing the most important pieces of info, due to your real immature tantrum throwing personalities, since you are not even a true administrator.

        Loading editor
    • "I have no tantrum problem compared to the ones who have been unreasonably erased the similar villains section of Robotnik again and again..."

      No tantrum problem? Then why did you continue to prolong a pointless edit war over that section? The majority of the users, and essentially all of the active admins who have taken a notice to that problem, are in consensus that an entire section devoted to vague and pointless similarities with other villains is pointless at best and clogs up the article at worst. And if fighting other users and refusing to accept those said changes isn't throwing the online equivalent of a tantrum, I don't know what is. 

      "I have given countless solid counter-arguments myself on why the Similar Villains should stay on the page..."

      Care to source or link to these arguments? Care to actually properly justify why they should be there?

      "...[T]here is really no excuse for you to use the spam of erasing the most important pieces of info, due to your real immature tantrum throwing personalities, since you are not even a true administrator."

      Here's my favorite part. You're putting me down because I'm doing something you don't link even though the vast majority of the people I've talked to about this section have judged it irrelevant and space-wasting. I'm doing my job and I'm upholding the rules; ones you're breaking by means of spam edits and initiating argumentative edit wars for the purpose of keeping those spam edits.

      Anything else, or are you going to stop this for the general sake of peacekeeping?

        Loading editor
    • You upholding the rule,  hardy-har-har, that is to laugh, more like you are breaking them with YOUR spam edits by erasing actual important details than upholding them, in which I was the one upholding them, plus that same majority of users, admins included, don't seem to have a problem with the similar villains added in the page of the certain villains, because they prove more to be true and useful than one can imagine; and that goes double for the heroes from Heroes wiki, so you should please stop your nonsense spamming for the sake of all peacekeeping.

        Loading editor
    • Sigh.

      Initiating this conversation was a mistake; you've provided literally no defense except the "no, you" counter-attack which gives you no flesh to your arguments and makes you look even less mature than you already are.

      I'll say this clearly; do not engage in those edits again or your next ban will be much more severe, especially taking this little conversation in mind.

      Clear or not, this conversation is over.

        Loading editor
    • Indeed this conversation is over, since the real immature person like yourself should stop spamming or the real immature person like yourself shall be the one to be banned.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.