FANDOM


  • I'll deal with them, since I'm a fan of surreal works and whatnot.. we should have a "Page Adoption" process on this wiki, I may think on suggesting it at some point.. where certain users adopt a page that is short on info.. that way pages aren't just dumped and we have less hassle of remaking pages ever time we get short info.

      Loading editor
    • okay. If that is what you wish, I will entrust those two to you and back down.

      but you said they are super-obscure and finding infos will be difficult. You have tough tasks ahead of you.

      and I can only help things I know and that are interesting to me.

      but, it is users' faults their inadequate pages are deleted. If they are not willing to invest their time and commitment they should not have made them in the first place.

      I made some articles on my own, and BOY were they TIME-CONSUMING! But I did it. Making articles is not for everyone.

        Loading editor
    • well, just look at Nada now.. even with limited info one can improve an article with simple steps.. infoboxes are a must for any article and they improve the look dramatically, as do they help with info.

        Loading editor
    • um, improvement... I wouldn't go that far... Not yet.

        Loading editor
    • pretty mouthy all of a sudden, aren't you? I suggest you either do better or learn to appreciate when admins actually try and do things.. already getting tired of your attitude.

        Loading editor
    • just one last question: isn't it a little too early to remove construction template?

        Loading editor
    • also, I'll apologize if I went off - improving articles takes time and effort plus my wiki codes are messing with me a lot.. I'm of the view fixing articles avoids the hassle of having to completely remake them, so what if the original author was "lazy" etc? it is our job NOT to be equally lazy by just erasing it.. even weak articles can have stuff people can work on and improve.. that way we don't have to keep deleting and recreating the same article day after day.

      that's my opinion and since I'm in a weird mood I'll leave it at that.

        Loading editor
    • be careful. Those bizarre glitches that had been plaguing the wiki seem to be still around.

        Loading editor
    • considering I did all the improvements to the article and I can delete, protect or revert it at any time? no.. I didn't even have to put the template on it.

      if people won't leave them alone I'll protect them, if admins declare otherwise I'll edit etc..

      as stands they are fine, there's worse articles to focus on and a basic article is a start, not going to get "perfection" on a Doom Patrol article.. look at the DC Database article and you'll see we've put more effort than the "official" site does, which shows something:

      http://dc.wikia.com/wiki/Brotherhood_of_Nada

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.