FANDOM


  • Hi, I'm an admin for the Villains Wiki community. Welcome and thank you for your edit to Makuta Teridax!

    If you need help getting started, check out our help pages or contact me or another admin here. For general help, you could also stop by Community Central to explore the forums and blogs.

    Enjoy your time at Villains Wiki!

      Loading editor
    • No problem buddy. Say, how exactly is it that this Unalaq guy counts as a villain, anyhow? I mean, I can see why with Ozai, but the issue is, many villains in Korra have passed the MEH just enough, regardless of their extremist ideas, but Unalaq yet counts as a Pure Evil. Why exactly is that?

        Loading editor
    • Personally I never found Unalaq a great example of Pure Evil but unlike others he lack redeeming features, plans to plunge the world into a millennium of chaos and darkness plus is abusive towards his kids. I've always found him debatable but he's worse than the others overall. The others at least had some noble intentions trying to help the setting in some way while Unalaq sought only ultimate power to rule the world as a godlike entity.

        Loading editor
    • So you are basically saying that Unalaq is a delusional fanatic with barely to no redeeming qualities whatsoever? Did I hear that right?

        Loading editor
    • Yeah that basically sums up Unalaq.

        Loading editor
    • Well, if that's the case, then what about Zaheer or Amon? They may show some redeeming features, but they're the aggressors as well. I mean, they sure as hell aren't exactly like Plankton or Mojo Jojo or Drakken or Sideshow Bob here.

        Loading editor
    • Pure Evil have no redeeming features, Amon truly wants to better the world by making everyone equal so Benders can't oppress others or abuse their powers which is somewhat implied Benders do abuse their powers, Zaheer wanted to free the world of oppression and truly valued his friends with clearly being upset when his lover was killed.

        Loading editor
    • Okay then. That being said, there is always someone who is the most evil of their respective franchises, and there always is a or a, even potential ones at that. We got ones in Disney, Sonic, Marvel, Dragon Ball Z, Nickelodeon, and so on and so forth. But the point is, there are some franchises that don't have a Pure Evil at the ready, specifically well-known shows like SpongeBob, the Simpsons, South Park, and Family Guy. So I gotta know, who is the most evil villain (not based on opinion) in at least those four shows overall?

        Loading editor
    • With SpongeBob I'd probably say most despicable would be Mr. Krabs though he's not played that seriously despite once trying to drive someone to suicide, with The Simpsons not too familiar with it, South Park I'd probably say Eric Cartman and Family Guy arguably Peter since he does some of the most repulsive crap on the show.

        Loading editor
    • Especially the ones there that would perfectly qualify as Pure Evil, but yet hasn't yet been labeled as such?

        Loading editor
    • Not the ones that switch from most evil to a joke?

        Loading editor
    • I don't feel anyone ever is portrayed as serious enough to be a Pure Evil character and the one person portrayed serious enough to count on SpongeBob just doesn't do enough to count.

        Loading editor
    • Not just SpongeBob, but Simpson's, South Park, Family Guy, the Office, and other comedic media that has a villain good and serious enough? I trust there is someone there.

        Loading editor
    • I mean we have Dick Hardly, Dark Danny, Dag, and all the other villains that has their names that start with d.

        Loading editor
    • Red vs. Blue has Felix who's rather entertaining though the whole story was already getting more serious beforehand.

        Loading editor
    • That show is a joke: just about a pointless war between two fully grown men in ridiculous suits of armor and killing each other. I'm talking about comedic media, like I already listed above.

        Loading editor
    • It actually is a comedic media that is fairly well known to the point they got Netflix to let it run. Personally I like it mostly for the later seasons where it developed a better plot and some character development. As for the shows you mentioned none of them have one yet nor have any I've seen from a normal television network created one yet in a comedic work.

        Loading editor
    • So for now it remains open ended about who will turn out to be a Pure Evil, then? Because, need I remind you, that even the most innocent of shows are not immune to these guys. I mean we got Dick Hardly from the Powerpuff Girls. The Powerpuff Girls, for crying out loud. They say it is an innocuous TV show meant for little kids that has its own share of wacky villains, lovable residents, and adorable superheroes. You would think that all villains would be like that, all down to the formula, right? Well, boy, did we get that wrong.

        Loading editor
    • Yeah some shows can surprise you with how dark some villains can get.

        Loading editor
    • How the hell is Governor John Ratcliffe counts as an Insecure? The guy is obsessed with gold and money, and seems willing to kill a tribe because they're animals. And even then, he's just a coward at heart, not insecure, so how does this make any sense?

        Loading editor
    • It's possible it's just abuse of the category as some users add the wrong categories at times.

        Loading editor
    • Ooh. And while we're at it, why is also Hopper or Syndrome not counting as Pure Evils? They seemed ruthless enough too. Syndrome is heartless enough to actually kill children because of a hatred for Mr. Incredible and not show a pang of guilt or remorse, and Hopper is deluded enough to force all ants into serving as his slaves because of what again? The food chain? I mean, you did say Mandible is Pure Evil, and I'd say he is just like Hopper in his own way, even though he came from DreamWorks.

        Loading editor
    • Hopper has a extremely small but redeeming trait of apparently caring for his mother as he keeps his promise to her. Syndrome I honestly kind of feel counts or minimum borderline in being one but see the arguments that maybe didn't do enough for a super villain since one tried to destroy a city in the film but some have argued its due to his excuse not being called out in the film. The only argument against I feel could count would be due to not doing a little more.

        Loading editor
    • You wanna explain what all that means?

        Loading editor
    • Hopper has one small redeeming feature can't count and Syndrome debatably doesn't go quite the extra mile required depending on who you ask.

        Loading editor
    • Why is Noo Noo not counted as Pure Evil? He seemed like a delusional fanatic and a complete monster, and he didn't seem to show remorse for his doing in infecting the Teletubbies. Yet he is not labeled as Pure Evil, for some reason. Why's that??

        Loading editor
    • I labeled him that twice, and yet I don't know if I did the right labeling.

        Loading editor
    • Personally from my reading it comes across as a fairly standard misanthropic scientist with delusions of grandeur.

        Loading editor
    • And how is that not a good reason for Pure Evil, again?

        Loading editor
    • It's a horror story and a Pure Evil should have crimres that stick out from the typical medium and somewhat unique for the setting.

        Loading editor
    • You meant crimes. Yes, you're right, but doesn't horror also have their Pure Evil villains, too? I mean, look at the original Freddy Krueger or Chucky or the original Mike Myers, not related to the actor of the same name, or the Tall Man, or.. Do I really need to go on?

        Loading editor
    • Yes horror has some but they are beyond just the generic stand in though personally I feel Chucky is played for laughs too much to count and Michael Myers actually started the trend for most slashers making him unique for the time. Noo Noo comes across as too standard in my opinion to count as he does what pretty much what anyone would expect of a mad scientist in that setting.

        Loading editor
    • Also, would Dietlinde Eckhart appropriately count as Pure Evil? Besides, TVTropes.com says she is, so I need clarification on that.

        Loading editor
    • Personally I haven't seen the film so I cannot say if I feel she counts.

        Loading editor
    • Well, is there someone here who has seen the film that can still clarify on that? Cause the proof is really on TvTropes, I'm not kidding there.

        Loading editor
    • Honestly I don't know off the top of my head but just because TV Tropes or another site accepts them doesn't mean this wiki will. It requires at minimum a good justification on how they meet all the requirements.

        Loading editor
    • I believe it had to do with her ranking. I don't really remember.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.