Nominations for articles to be featured on the front page.


  • Nominations must be at the very least 350 words long.
  • An article is featured every month, or at the admins' discretion.
  • Whichever article has the most votes at the end of the month is featured for a month.
    • Each downvote counts as a point down for the nominee.
    • In case of a tie, the one with fewer downvotes wins.
  • Admin votes carry the same weight as regular users' votes.
  • All nominations and votes must be signed with four tildes (~~~~). Unsigned nominations and votes will be nullified.
  • Nominations and votes CANNOT BE CHANGED. Each user can only vote ONCE, for and against.
  • An article cannot be nominated twice in a row (if an article was nominated in the previous voting, it cannot be nominated again in the current one).
  • Users cannot nominate articles two months in a row.
  • Only six nominations max for every monthly voting are allowed. Any nomination surpassing this limit will be automatically disqualified.
  • CHEATING WILL NEVER BE TOLERATED. Any user who starts downvoting candidates just to rig the results or go asking other users to vote on his candidate will receive a warning and, in case of reincidence, a one month ban. No exceptions.
  • The use of sockpuppets in VFH is extremely forbidden, resulting in the permanent ban of the sockpuppet's account(s) and in the deletion of your nominated villain.
  • Once the vote was posted, there is no turning back to edit the description of your vote. If you voted against a candidate for a trivial reason and had your vote discarded by an admin, it will be forbidden to go back and edit the reason of your vote to make your denied vote valid again. Doing so will result in a week ban, NO exceptions.
  • There is a limit for how many times a villain can be nominated in a period of time. If a candidate is downvoted but still being brought to VFH more than once in the following months, the limit is 3 attempts. If a villain is downvoted 3 times, the villain can not be proposed again until 12 months has passed after the last proposal. Bringing the villain back before then is a violation of this rule and the candidate will be erased from the nominations. For this limit to reset, the villain must not be proposed for 12 months after the last proposal.


  • Be original and creative with the nominations.
  • Don't vote against a villain if you haven't read the article about it yet.
  • Don't vote against a villain just because you know nothing about him/her/it.
  • Don't say anything that may be offensive to another.
  • If you're going to vote against, present an actual argument for your reasoning. "He's boring" or "I don't like him" aren't arguments.

The correct nomination format is as follows:

  • (if anyone votes against:) against reasons for against

Copy and paste the above table below the line

Yuno Gasai

For: 7
Against: 3
  • With this February being the first one of the decade, what better VFH option is there then the queen of yanderes herself?
  • She is too overrated IMO. I guess I should be more frank with my reasoning: yeah, she is a yandere. One of the most overly used tropes present in several anime and manga. Nothing about it is unique.
  • Yuno is a very great choice for February because she had done a lot of unspeakable things to even kill the person that she loves dearly to repeat the Survival Game all over again.
  • After giving it some thought, I'm not really onboard with seeing her headlined. I get that you're trying to aim for the Valentine's Day and love asethethic here, but I think someone like Albedo would have worked better for this cause at least she has a more interesting character going with her than just being your typical yandere. Or maybe someone with a love backstory, like Akaza from Demon Slayer, with his tragic backstory involving his fianceé. 
  • Y'see, mainly proposed Yuno as she's arguably the most famous example, for iconic value. Albedo is a alright alternative but Ainz is already repped as a VFH, and I don't want Akanza before Muzan.

Santánico Pandemónium

For: 6
Against: 0
  • (if anyone votes against:) against reasons for against
  • Alright, I nominate Santanico because honestly, she screams wanting to be nominated on the Valentines Day. Everything about her is alluring, beautiful and sexy and it helps that Salma Hayek nails the role nicely as a beautiful yet dangerous villain. Not only that, she is one of the most attractive live action villains I've ever seen in media as for now.
  • A seductive and dangerous vampire, the fact that she was portrayed by Salma Hayek and her outer beauty and charisma makes her fit for next month's Valentine's Day.


For: 2
Against: 0
  • (if anyone votes against:) against reasons for against
  • He's one of the most badass villains in Power Rangers with tragic backstory as well.

Candyman (Candyman)

For: 1
Against: 0
  • (if anyone votes against:) against reasons for against
  • A tragic romantic who was murdered for falling in love and came back as a vengeful urban legend.

Sōsuke Aizen

For: 1
Against: 0
  • (if anyone votes against:) against reasons for against

Mad Jim Jaspers

For: 1
Against: 0
  • (if anyone votes against:) against reasons for against
  • Figure why not try a second time, good old Jaspers is a suitable candidate for our wiki's tradition of exposing more obscure villains to the world.
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.