Villains Wiki:VFH

Nominations for articles to be featured on the front page.

Guidelines

• Nominations must be at the very least 350 words long.
• An article is featured every month, or at the admins' discretion.
• Whichever article has the most votes at the end of the month is featured for a month.
  • Each downvote counts as a point down for the nominee.
  • In case of a tie, the one with fewer downvotes wins.
• Admin votes carry the same weight as regular users' votes.
• All nominations and votes must be signed with four tildes (~~~~). Unsigned nominations and votes will be nullified.
• Nominations and votes CANNOT BE CHANGED. Each user can only vote ONCE, for and against.
• An article cannot be nominated twice in a row (if an article was nominated in the previous voting, it cannot be nominated again in the current one).
• Users cannot nominate articles two months in a row.
• Only six nominations max for every monthly voting are allowed. Any nomination surpassing this limit will be automatically disqualified.
• CHEATING WILL NEVER BE TOLERATED. Any user who starts downvoting candidates just to rig the results or go asking other users to vote on his candidate will receive a warning and, in case of reincidence, a one month ban. No exceptions.
• The use of sockpuppets in VFH is extremely forbidden, resulting in the permanent ban of the sockpuppet's account(s) and in the deletion of your nominated villain.
• Once the vote was posted, there is no turning back to edit the description of your vote. If you voted against a candidate for a trivial reason and had your vote discarded by an admin, it will be forbidden to go back and edit the reason of your vote to make your denied vote valid again. Doing so will result in a week ban, NO exceptions.
• There is a limit for how many times a villain can be nominated in a period of time. If a candidate is downvoted but still being brought to VFH more than once in the following months, the limit is 3 attempts. If a villain is downvoted 3 times, the villain can not be proposed again until 12 months has passed after the last proposal. Bringing the villain back before then is a violation of this rule and the candidate will be erased from the nominations. For this limit to reset, the villain must not be proposed for 12 months after the last proposal.

Suggestions

• Be original and creative with the nominations.
• Don't vote against a villain if you haven't read the article about it yet.
• Don't vote against a villain just because you know nothing about him/her/it.
• Don't say anything that may be offensive to another.
• If you're going to vote against, present an actual argument for your reasoning. "He's boring" or "I don't like him" aren't arguments.

The correct nomination format is as follows:

For:
Against:	(if anyone votes against:) against reasons for against
Comments

Copy and paste the above table below the line

Chong Li

For: 2	Welcome to your doom! 01:00, August 1, 2020 (UTC) Shinobi76 (talk) 01:18, August 1, 2020 (UTC)
Against: 0	(if anyone votes against:) against reasons for against
Comments	Time to headline a villain from a classic martial arts movie, and to commemorate Bolo Yeung's anniversary last month. Although I am not a big fan of this month's selection to admit, mainly gave Chong my blessing due to him repping a martial arts movie, something we don't have yet in the lineup of VFHs.

Hawk Moth

For: 5	Ordeaux26 (talk) 01:01, August 1, 2020 (UTC) AnibusDogen (talk) 01:18, August 1, 2020 (UTC) Sirocelot (talk) 06:35, August 1, 2020 (UTC) Geek from Hell (talk) 17:34, August 1, 2020 (UTC) .Fel Aubin (talk) 02:27, August 2, 2020 (UTC)
Against: 0	(if anyone votes against:) against reasons for against
Comments	Since its Miraculous Ladybug’s 5th anniversary and Hawk Moth is also a great villain who despite being evil as sympathetic reasons for doing what he does. And he is also unique in the way he is from an ongoing show and he is also a change from the two completely irredeemable villains we have had headlined previously though Hawk Moth is less morally ambiguous then Ratso Rizzo as he is still clearly a villain. The following reasons provided by Ordeaux I agree with. I've seen the other pages and none of them have much of a significance as Hawk Moth since it is the 5th anniversary of Miraculous Ladybug. Plus, the article itself is really well done.

Tony Montana

For: 4	Robbtff (talk) 01:01, August 1, 2020 (UTC) KarosBinosKlinos (talk) 01:18, August 1, 2020 (UTC) NerdWithAKeyboard (talk) 06:37, August 1, 2020 (UTC) Fower42 (talk) 02:09, August 2, 2020 (UTC)
Against: 0	(if anyone votes against:) against reasons for against
Comments	Tony Montana is a pretty good villain as it shows his rise fueled by his lust for power and wealth, to his eventual downfall in the course of one movie. Also a good performance by Pacino. Say hello to my little friend! Guess im gonna go with him, wanna see a Pacino character on the headline to be honest.

Evox

For: 1	Griffguy26 (talk) 01:06, August 1, 2020 (UTC)
Against: 0	(if anyone votes against:) against reasons for against
Comments	Main antagonist for the entire Beast Morpher series who's none other than Venjix Computer Virus from RPM.

Lil' Slugger

For: 3	AustinDR (talk) 08:07, July 31, 2020 (UTC) Greglarocca095 (talk) 21:45, August 1, 2020 (UTC) Snape Uchiha (talk) 01:12, August 2, 2020 (UTC)
Against: 0	(if anyone votes against:) against reasons for against
Comments

Ratso Rizzo

For: 5	Loolveus (talk) 02:11, August 1st, 2020 (UTC) Mekaiser ☯ 01:28, August 1, 2020 (UTC) Dark Priest Hargon (talk) 9:35, August 1st, 2020 (HKC) Looperreallyreallysucks (talk) 01:36, August 1, 2020 (UTC) Have an inktastic day (talk) 01:39, August 1, 2020 (UTC)
Against: 0	AnibusDogen (talk) 01:49, August 1, 2020 (UTC)
Comments	An interesting and tragic protagonist villain, a favourite of mine and a certain friend who desperately wanted him headlined, well he deserves it. Unique and off the wall pick I'd say. ”I’m walkin’ here!” ‘Nuff said. Another (somewhat) underrated villain who deserves recognition on this wiki. I thought it would also be unique to headline a character who is completely morally ambiguous rather than always headlining the completely irredeemable and unquestionably evil villains, and above all, headlining one of the two main characters in the film is a fitting way to honor one of the greatest films ever made.  He is not really a villain. I mean sure he comes from a popular movie but using a quote to justify isn't a vote whoever put that. He is as much of a villain as Nick Wilde and he doesn't have a page here. Why should he get all the attention? He is small-time. A con-man featured for a month? Now, I admit I am new to this but I don't get the love.